Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc."— Presentation transcript:

1 Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.

2 Phytoremediation The use of plants to degrade, extract, contain, or immobilize contaminants in soil, sediment, groundwater, or surface water. Phytotechnology Technical & Regulatory Guidance Document – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation

3 Phytotechnologies can be applied either in situ or ex situ and include: Phytostabilization, erosion, and leachate control Degradation/ Detoxification Phytovolatilization Constructed and Natural Wetlands for Treatment of Surface Water Phytoextraction: Heavy metal and radio nuclide accumulation Rhizodegradation & Rhizofiltration Rhizodegradation, & Contaminant Uptake Hydraulic control: Plume containment Chemical Phytostabilization

4  Stabilization of contaminated soils in place by vegetation, and immobilization (physically or chemically) of contaminants Source: ITRC, 2001

5 Phytostabilization  Advantages  Reduction in erosion potential (wind, soil, runoff, leaching)  Low Cost / Less Disruptive  No removal or disposal  Drawbacks  Effects limited to immediate area of the plantings  Long term maintenance / monitoring

6 Rhizodegradation  The breakdown of contaminants in the soil through the bioactivity that exists in the rhizosphere  Bacteria, Yeasts, Fungi Source: ITRC, 2001

7 Rhizodegradation  Advantages  Positive affects on soil microbe populations  Natural or created wetlands  Low Cost  Release to air less likely  Drawbacks  Effects can be limited to the immediate area of the plantings  Time  Long term maintenance / monitoring

8 Phytodegradation  Uptake of organic contaminants with the subsequent transformation in the plant’s roots, stems, and leaves. Source: ITRC, 2001

9 Phytodegradation  Advantages  Contaminants removed from soil  No residuals management  Either metabolized or degraded  Low cost  Drawbacks  Difficult to separate from phytovolatilization  Possible toxic daughter products

10 Phytovolatilization  Translocation of dissolved contaminants into plant leaves followed by transpiration to the atmosphere. Source: ITRC, 2001

11 Phytovolatilization  Advantages  Contaminants removed from soil  Transformed to less toxic products  No residuals management  Drawbacks  Moving problem from one media to another  Possible air monitoring

12 Phytoextraction  Translocation of soil contaminants to above ground stems and leaves. Source: ITRC, 2001

13 Phytoextraction  Advantages  Contaminants removed from soil  Translocation to above ground plant parts allows harvesting  Reduced disposal costs  Drawbacks  Above ground plant residues must be managed  Must properly dispose

14 Rhizofiltration  Sorption, concentration, and/or precipitation of contaminants from surface waters or groundwater Source: ITRC, 2001

15 Rhizofiltration  Advantages  Stream treatment can occur above ground  Not limited by site location  Drawbacks  Applicable to aqueous phase contamination  Requires engineered system (influent)  Requires monitoring  Must be properly disposed

16 Hydraulic Control  Uptake and consumption of groundwater in order to contain or control the migration of contaminants. Source: ITRC, 2001

17 Hydraulic Control  Advantages  Extracted water is respired by plants  No treatment required  Drawbacks  Hydraulic control by plants is seasonal  Limited primarily to rooting zone  Time and space

18 Site Evaluation and Phytoremediation Design  Conduct typical site assessment  Develop conceptual phytoremediation design  Evaluate Phytoremediation design vs. traditional remedial alternatives  Costs  Bench scale or pilot scale evaluation of selected phytoremediation approach  Field implementation/planting  Monitoring and reporting

19 Technology Limitations  Root contact with contaminant - Plant roots must be able to extend to the depth of contaminant or contaminant must be moved to the root zone.  Growth rate of plants – Time (months to years) required for plants to reach maturity.  Contaminant concentration – Free product concentrations toxic to plants.  Unfavorable site conditions – Dense clays, salts, pH or dry conditions not conducive to plant growth.  Ecological risks – Plants may present new exposure pathway for humans and other local organisms

20 Technology Limitations -continued.  Space concerns – Is space or area available for design/implementation?  Waste production - If wastes are produced can they effectively be disposed?  Mechanism of contaminant remediation – will COC be accumulated within plant tissue or volatilized?

21 Elizabeth City, NC

22 Argonne East Site

23 BP Amoco Site – Sugar Creek, MO


Download ppt "Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google