“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Instructional Decision Making
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Moving School-wide PBIS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 Tennessee School-wide PBIS State Conf Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Coaching PBIS Implementation Coaching PBIS Implementation Rob Horner org.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.
Timberlane Regional School District
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
D62 Response to Intervention
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Early Intervention Project Proposal for
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Virginia Tiered System of Supports Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia A. Cave February 2014.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Presentation transcript:

“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner Virginia Tiered Systems of Supports (VTSS) Integrating academics, behavior and mental health into a singular framework “Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner

True or False? VTSS stands for Very Tough Schoolwide Suspension. VTSS is inclusive of RTi (Response to Intervention) and PBIS (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. VTSS is a framework rather than a program. VTSS requires two specific data sets for fidelity. Special education is the focus of VTSS. 73% of participating VTSS schools made modifications to their behavior policies.

Essential Components Aligned Organizational Culture and Structure Data Informed Decision-Making Evidence-Based Practices Family, School, and Community Partnership Monitoring Student Progress (including universal screening) Evaluation (including outcomes and fidelity)

Mission To promote a culture of continuous growth through on-going professional learning. To implement with fidelity, proactive and preventative evidence- based practices to support (improved) measureable academic and social behavioral outcomes. To use data informed problem solving, decision-making, screening, and progress monitoring to effectively meet instructional needs. To build an integrated framework that promotes shared leadership at the division, school, classroom, and community levels.

Vision The vision of VTSS is to build capacity for a sustained tiered system of academic and social behavioral supports that are responsive to the needs of all students.

TIER I: Core, Universal GOAL: 100% of students achieve at high levels! Implementing well researched programs and practices demonstrated to produce good outcomes for the majority of students Tier 1 is effective if at least 80% are meeting benchmarks Guiding questions for Tier 1: What do we expect ALL students to learn? How will we know if and when a student has learned core curriculum? How will we respond when some students aren’t successful? How will we respond when some students have already demonstrated success with the curriculum? 6 6 6

TIER II: Supplemental, Targeted Tier II is effective if at least 70-80% of students improve performance (i.e. gap is closing toward benchmark and/or progress monitoring goals) GOAL: No more than approximately 20% of students needing supplemental instruction in addition to the core instruction to achieve benchmarks. Guiding questions for Tier II : Where are students performing now? Where do we want the students to be performing? How long do we have to get the students to meet their achievement goals? How are we going to progress monitor skill attainment? What resources do we need to build skills at an acceptable rate? 7 7

TIER III: Intensive, Individualized Tier III: is effective if at least 70-80% of students improve performance (i.e. gap is closing toward benchmark and/or progress monitoring goals) GOAL: 0-5% of students needing intensive, individualized instruction in addition to core and supplemental instruction in order to achieve benchmarks. Guiding questions for Tier III Where is the student performing now? What is a realistic and attainable goal for achievement for the student? How long do we have to get the student to meet that goal? What supports has the student received prior to Tier III? What resources do we need to build skills at an acceptable rate? 8 8

Resource map what you have for data, systems and practices! Leadership Team Established: Support the vision of a sustainable implementation of a tiered system through effective communication, common language, infrastructure planning, consensus and commitment building and a communication plan Resource map what you have for data, systems and practices! OUTCOMES Start with universal data and other multiple measures to set goals SYSTEMS DATA Set up a system of decision rules and clarity around tiered support (Tier Definitions) PRACTICES Build a Continuum of Supports that includes Evidence Based Practices (EBPs) at all 3 tiers for academics and behavior with a scheduled time and resources for delivery. 9

OUTCOMES SYSTEMS DATA PRACTICES Set up an effective and efficient (i.e. clear purpose and efficient teaming) data-informed decision making process Progress Monitor all 3 tiers systematically using assessments defined in tier definition. SYSTEMS DATA PRACTICES Provide professional development to support staff in improving outcomes and meeting goals. OUTCOMES Examine OUTCOMES: Were the desired outcomes achieved? Were the evidence based instruction, interventions and supports implemented with fidelity? 10

What data does a VTSS system need? Do you have a universal screener? How do you progress monitor? How do you know the health of your core beyond the SOLs? How do you know if progress is sufficient to close the gap? Do you have an integrated data dashboard?

Supporting Instruction for Better Outcomes At the student level, instruction is provided based on specific criteria to indicate areas of need, with an understanding that students are not tiered, but rather services are tiered. There is a further understanding of the level of service that defines a tiered support, and data is collected at all three tiers to measure improvement. All students receive Tier One support and if this core is not sufficient, then the focus of supports is intensified first at that level.

Supporting Behavior Management for Positive Outcomes Positive Behavior Implementation Systems are in over 20% of our schools nation-wide. VA….. Use data to assess systems that work; build decision systems not data systems Tiered Fidelity Inventory Goal is to avoid discipline disproportionality Small number of students creating a lot of excitement and who those students are should be transparent based on data. Activity to create their own dashboard

The SWIS Dashboard presents a variety of data and allows for quick analysis of progress by time of day, by location, by student, and more. Users can select tabs to add referrals, view reports, drill down into their data, and manager user accounts.

School capacity is built through Professional Development A Systems Coach will be assigned to each division and support them step-by-step through the process, provide professional development for monitoring data and editing their program as needed. A set of skills will be shared that provides embedded, sustained professional learning. Through ongoing relationships and facilitating a cyclical process, systems coaching develops the capacity of division and school leadership teams to implement and align VTSS with their mission and goals in order to enhance student outcomes.

Phases of Implementation Exploration: To assess the match between an innovation and school need. It’s important to examine current practices, systems, and resources to ensure the innovation can fit the unique context of the school/community. Installation Phase: To establish the resources needed to use an innovation and resources required to implement the innovation with fidelity and good outcomes for students. Roles are defined, awareness activities occur throughout the school. Initial Implementation: Identifying necessary adjustments. All systems for recruitment, coaching, and data processes are in place and focused on sustainability. Full Implementation: Skillful use of an evidence-based practice or innovation is well integrated, and documented, into the repertoire of stakeholders throughout the school and community. Innovation & Sustainability: The procedures that allow a system to continually compare valued outcomes against current practice and modify practices to continue to achieve valued outcomes as the context changes over time

How does the role of a DDOT change with multi-tier systems of supports?

Changing the way we think about special education http://sss.usf.edu/resources/format/pdf/specially_designed_instruction.pdf

Supporting Decision Making with Data The District Capacity Assessment (DCA) is an action assessment designed to help educational district leaders and staff better align resources with intended outcomes and develop action plans to support the use of effective innovations. The Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) are used by teams to evaluate the status of supports and to provide a way to assess and identify areas of strength and need for establishing future action plans for sustained implementation.   The purpose of the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) is to provide a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of the extent to which school personnel are applying the core features of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). The TFI is divided into three sections (Tier I (Universal Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports -PBIS) Whole School Universal Prevention Tier II (Targeted PBIS) Secondary Small Group Prevention Tier III (Intensive PBIS) Tertiary Individual Support Prevention Give them scoring sheet with highlights.

How will know if we’re being successful? VTSS supports collecting data for Office Referrals, In School Suspension (ISS) and Out of School Suspension (OSS) Weekly monitoring of outcomes allows for assessment of overall changes as well as highlighting any discrepancies by gender, ethnicity or SPED Standards of Learning (SOL) data will also be compared longitudinally VTSS will work with VDOE to collect as much data as possible to avoid duplicate reporting by divisions/schools A variety of online resources are available to collect data. Many SIS’s already used in divisions collect this tool as well as VDOE supported analytic tools.

So in a Nutshell… We organize our resources Multi-Tier Mapping, Gap Analysis So kids get help early Actions based on outcomes (data!), not procedures We do stuff that’s likely to work Evidence-Based practices (Academic Behavioral Instruction) Did the instruction work Data based decision making at all three Tiers We provide supports to staff to build capacity Fidelity: Benchmarks of Quality/Intervention specific Professional Learning And make sure they’re successful Coaching and Support Progress monitoring and performance feedback Problem-Solving process Increasing levels of intensity

Next Steps for VTSS Contact: Kris Herakovich-Curtis at kherakovich@vcu.edu Regina Pierce at rpierce@vcu.edu Each division or school must apply for the VTSS Grant. For more information: https://www.pbis.org/ https://www.pbis.org/common/cms/files/Current%20Topics/Final- Monograph.pdf #vtss_ric