Aligning LEA Planning Processes A Systemic Design Presented by Linda Murphy, PSP Dorothy White, PSP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

Data Analysis Chapter 11..powerful professional development tool that can lead to school improvement.
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
PORTFOLIO.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment. Objectives Identify the components of a comprehensive needs assessment Classify the types of data collected.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Improvement Plan Training NCLB. No Child Left Behind Program Series: Improvement Plans.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
NCLB Comprehensive Needs Assessment Training. Objectives To provide consistency across the State regarding a process for conducting a Comprehensive Needs.
Region 8 Education Service Center.  Develop an understanding of the characteristics and requirements of a CNA.  Develop an understanding of the CNA.
Semonti Basu PBS Technical Assistance Facilitator Grace Martino-Brewster PBS Specialist Austin Independent School District Connecting Data Dots Using data-based.
Source: 1 NJASA February 23 rd, Our conversation today  What I bring to the NJDOE  CCSS overview  Regional Achievement Centers overview  Four.
Part 2. Participate fully Hand in the air for getting attention Problem solve Limit side conversations Silence cell phone Norms.
Linking Working Systemically to Research On Effective Professional Development.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
SEM Planning Model.
Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
PECAT Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool Lessons for Physical Education Teacher Preparation Programs National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
CONDUCTING PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Brooke Blair, ALSDE Mark Ward, ALSDE Erin McCann, SEDL Mary Lou Meadows, SEDL.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
© 2011 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency Progress Monitoring Campus RTI Implementation: The RTI – Data Management Tool (RTI-DMT) Pamela.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
Supporting Instructional Shifts: School Leaders Reflecting on Co-teaching and Small Group Instruction.
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Working Systemically: The District’s Role In School Improvement An Overview.
Target Goals and Action Plans NDE School Improvement Workshops Fall 2011.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Stage 4 Restructuring Stage 5 Alternative Governance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Working Systemically For Increased Student Achievement OVERVIEW.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Federal Programs Department: Plan4Learning
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Empowering Effective Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Continuous Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Aligning LEA Planning Processes A Systemic Design Presented by Linda Murphy, PSP Dorothy White, PSP

The Big Picture

Aligning of improvement processes and district/campus practices

Goals by Stephen Covey

Goals Develop foundational understanding of research based systems and needs assessment processes Incorporate a variety of data sources in the needs assessment processes Generate new ideas with colleagues to create local systems of improvement planning in compliance with state and federal guidance

TEA Accountability Workbook: Improvement Plan 90 Day Strategy/ Plans LEA CIP/DIP Tool PSP Progress Report Site Visit Reports Quarterly Implementation Report (QIR) Student Level Review (SLR) Targeted Student Analysis (TSA ) TEA Accountability Workbook: Needs Assessment Region 20 CNA Tool ESC Led Needs Assessment Snapshot LEA tool CPE Student Level Review (SLR) TEA Accountability Workbook: Data Analysis Approved Data Disaggregation Tool ESC Led Data Analysis LEA tool Data Analysis Needs Assessment Plan Implement and Monitor

Working Systemically SEDL Developed and tested a systemic model designed to improve student achievement in low-performing districts and schools Collaborated with the Charles A. Dana Center in Austin –49 schools in 23 districts –Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas –Rural, suburban, and urban settings

Options…. Fix the parts Transfer innovations Fix the people Improve teacher/administrator knowledge and skills Fix the school Apply organizational development approaches to schools only Fix the system An approach informed by research…

9 What Working Systemically IS NOT Empowered Individuals/Schools No Systemic Approach Working Systemically in Action, SEDL, 2008

10 What Working Systemically IS NOT Still No Systemic Approach Schools District Working Systemically in Action, SEDL, 2008 District’s Purpose Clear Schools’ Purpose Clear

11 What Working Systemically IS  District’s Purpose Clear/Schools’ Purpose Clear  Common Focus on Student Achievement  Each Mutually Supportive Classrooms Schools District Increased Student Achievement Working Systemically in Action, SEDL, 2008

Bernhardt, Using Data to Improve Student Learning in School Districts, 2006

Data Analysis- Demographics

Data Analysis- Perceptions

Data Analysis- School Processes

Data Analysis-Student Learning

Bernhardt, Using Data to Improve Student Learning in School Districts, 2006

Goals by Stephen Covey

CNA Link:

CNA Spreadsheet

8 CNA Focus Areas Demographics Student Achievement School Culture and Climate Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Family and Community Involvement School Organization Technology Data analysis should not be just about gathering data. It is very easy to get “analysis paralysis” by spending too much time pulling data together and not spending time using the data. -Victoria Bernhardt

Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention refers to the school organization’s level of high-quality, highly-effective staff, in high- poverty schools. This area is also focused on assessing the effect of recruitment and retention strategies on staffing patterns. Staff Quality, Recruitment and Retention An empowered organization is one in which individuals have the knowledge, skill, desire, and opportunity to pursue success in way that leads to collective and organizational success - Stephen Covey

CNA REFLECTIVE QUESTIONS

Reflective Question Activity Work in pairs or triads Respond to reflective Questions from CNA tool. Be prepared to share

Creating a School Profile Decide what you want to measure and report. Determine who will be responsible for organizing, developing and updating the profile. Develop a management system for collecting and organizing the data in the profile. Be selective about the type and amount of data to collect. Take a baseline assessment of the data available in each area of focus. Determine any additional information that is needed and the procedures for collecting it. Write a narrative to support the story the data presents; use varied formats for illustrating the narrative with charts, graphs, tables. There are three kinds of curricula ;they must be considered together and improved together: written curriculum, taught curriculum, and tested curriculum. – Fenwick English

Process Step 1 – Review the purpose and outcomes for conducting the CNA Step 2 – Establish committees for each area of the CNA Step 3 – Determine which types of data will be collected and analyzed by the committee to develop the school profile Step 4 – Determine areas of priority and summarize needs Step 5 – Connect the CNA to the district/campus improvement plan development and review process Create the kind of climate in your organization where personal growth is expected, recognized and rewarded. -Author Unknown

How can your LEA/Campus incorporate alternative planning procedures in order to implement a research based aligned process that is in compliance with state and federal guidelines and with a direct connection to improvement initiatives?

Resources TEA Guidance for the Texas Accountability Intervention System spx?id= &menu_id= &menu_id2= http:// spx?id= &menu_id= &menu_id2= (HINT: TEA Accountability Monitoring web page) ESC 20 CNA tool portal/NCLB/CNA.htm References Cowan, D., Joyner, S., & Beckwith, S. (2008). Working Systemically in action: A guide for facilitators. Austin, TX: SEDL. Bernhardt, Victoria L. (2006). Using data to improve student learning in school districts. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.

Contact Information Dorothy White Linda Murphy