Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison  1803  Article III – Judicial Powers  Establishment of Judicial Review – the power of the Supreme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Case Review
Advertisements

Landmark Supreme Court Cases Marbury v Madison Description (Key Question) –Who has the power to decide what is Constitutional? Decision –Established.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
1. Supreme Court case that established judicial review 2. Amendment: suffrage cannot be denied based on race 3. A 3/5 th vote to end a filibuster 4. Creating.
Unit 4 Citizenship Individuals can demonstrate national identity by fulfilling duties and responsibilities.
IMPORTANT US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
Supreme Court Decisions. GIBBONS V. OGDEN MIRANDA V. ARIZONA FURMAN V. GEORGIA GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT TINKER V. DES MOINES U.S. V. NIXON NY TIMES V. U.S.
Jeopardy!!! 1st Amendment At School Equal Protection Rights of the Accused Potpourri \
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison, 1803 Midnight Appointments – Court Appointments by John Adams Established the power of Judicial Review.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
2.05 Starter Why were the Civil War amendments so important? Explain the 14 th amendment in your own words. Which amendment was repealed (done away with)?
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury vs. Madison 1803  Established the power of Judicial Review  Declared part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional,
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES. 14 TH AMENDMENT CASES State & federal citizenship for all persons regardless of race both born or naturalized in the United.
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803) Marbury v. Madison (1803) Marbury v. Madison (1803) Marbury v. Madison (1803) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) A United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Review Questions: Court Cases.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
The Supreme Court.
Important Supreme Court Decisions. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Court’s right of judicial review (the right to determine the constitutionality.
SUPREME COURT CASES CASES EVERY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT NEEDS TO KNOW.
Supreme Court Cases EOC Review Becky Griffith. Marbury v. Madison, 1803 Judicial Review.
CasesMore Cases -Precedent Setting Executive Departments.
U.S. Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison 1803 Established judicial review— allowing for the court to rule on whether or not a law is allowed by the.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison 1803 DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Courts right of Judicial Review (right to determine the constitutionality.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v Madison This case establishes the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Constitutional basis: supremacy clause What.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Question – Does the Supreme Court have the authority to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional?
Key Supreme Court Cases. Cases on Federalism Marbury v. Madison (1803): judicial review, strong S.C. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): court has implied powers,
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison Does the Judiciary Act of 1789 allow Marbury to take his case directly to the Supreme Court? Does the.
Do-Now Make sure your case books are ready to turn in—they should have a name, situation, key phrase, and picture on every page! Study study study!
IMPORTANT LANDMARK CASES THAT DEFINED THE SUPREME COURT I : Three Cases that help define the role of Federal Power. A. Marbury v. Madison (1803) established.
SUPREME COURT CASES Other Cases Civil Rights (1) Student Rights Civil Rights (2) th, 5 th, 6 th Amendments Federal Government.
Supreme Court Cases Exam Review. ___1. Power of Judicial Review ___2. Only congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. ___3. National Supremacy.
Supreme Court Cases. Warm Up 1. How does a case reach the Supreme Court? 2. What is the cartoon below implying?
4.04: Creation and Defense of Individual Rights Supreme Court Cases.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval! ► “Equal Justice.
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison Issue: Should the Constitution be very strictly interpreted or is there room for interpretation? If there.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Proving that the Bill of Rights protects you.
Quote of the Day: “School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are "persons" under.
The Warren Court (1950s-1960s) How did the Supreme Court (under the leadership of Earl Warren) expand the rights of individuals?
Happy Wednesday!!!! Roll Call Question: Favorite board game?
Landmark Supreme Court Decisions
Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803)
US SUPREME COURT CASE PROJECT
The Judicial Branch of Government
Review the Constitution—Judicial Branch Look at Landmark Cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Civics EoCA Review Landmark Cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
AP Gov Review: Unit #6 in 10 minutes
Landmark Supreme court cases
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
C3.2(2) LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
Review! Review! Review! What is federalism?
Historic Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Important Court Cases and the United States Constitution
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
Do Now: a) Finish up Rights Movement Packet b) Earl Warren Background
Landmark Supreme court cases
Presentation transcript:

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Marbury v. Madison  1803  Article III – Judicial Powers  Establishment of Judicial Review – the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law or government action unconstitutional  Chief Justice William Marshall ruled with a unanimous court that the Judicial Act violated the Constitution and thus should not be followed

Gibbons v. Ogden  1824  Supremacy Clause  Strengthened the power of the federal government to regulate any interstate business  Lead the federal regulation of broadcasting, banking and oil pipelines  Established the Constitution as the tie that binds the national and state governments together and that the Constitution will be the final word

Plessy v. Ferguson  1896  14 th Amendment  Separate but equal  Court interpreted the 14 th amendment as “not intended to give Negroes social equity but only political and civil equity”

Korematsu v. US  1944  Civil Rights  Court upheld the military order presented by the circumstances of WW II – “Pressing public necessity may sometimes justify the existence of restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group”

Brown v. Board of Education  1954  14 th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause  Separate but equal has no place  Integrated schools  Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson

Mapp v. Ohio  1962  4 th and 14 th Amendment  Illegal Evidence and Due Process Claus  No illegal search and seizures applied to all states  Before this rule not every state incorporated excluding evidence gained through an illegal search  Exclusionary Rule

Gideon v. Wainwright  1963  6 th Amendment  Right to Counsel  Person must have counsel provided, regardless of the charges filed against them  Gideon Rule

Reynolds v. Sims  1964  14 th Amendment  Equal Protection  Members of Alabama’s Jefferson County protested the state’s policy of one senator from each county regardless of the population  The Supreme Court ruled that Alabama’s Congress had to be apportioned to it populations  It required states to have “honest and good faith” to set district representation equal to its population

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US  1964  Civil Rights  Supremacy Clause  Congress could outlaw racial segregation of private facilities that are engaged in interstate commerce

In Re Gault  1966  14 th Amendment  Due Process Clause  Provided the due processes of an accused to juveniles  Prior to this ruling juvenile crimes were handled in family law not criminal law

Miranda v. Arizona  1966  5 th, 6 th, and 14 th Amendment  Rights of the Accused  When Ernesto Miranda was arrested and questioned and signed a confession that listed that he had “full knowledge of his legal rights”, he was not made aware of his rights to counsel and the confession was illegally gained.  Miranda Rights of person being arrested

Tinker v. Des Moines  1969  1 st Amendment  Students do not shed their Constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school house gates unless a substantial disruption results

Swann v. CMS  1971  14 th Amendment  Civil Rights/Equal Protection Clause  This decision changed the landscape of CMS schools by forcing the busing of students outside their neighborhood school  This lead to forced desegregation of schools

Furman v. Georgia  1971  8 th Amendment  Capital Punishment  Racial imbalances in the use of the death penalty lead to questions of how the penalty should be applied  “Apparent arbitrariness of the use of the sentence”  Lead to the rewriting of the death penalty laws in many states

Regents of the UC v. Bakke  1978  Affirmative Action  Invalidated the medical schools special admission program and directed the regents to admit Bakke, but did not overturn all affirmative action programs

New Jersey v. TLO  1985  4 th and 14 th Amendment  This case allowed students to be searched under the heading of “reasonable suspicion” and “probable cause”

Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier  1988  1 st Amendment  This case allows school officials to have full control of school sponsored activities  Activities can continue “so long as their actions are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns

Texas v. Johnson  1989  1 st Amendment  This case protected the rights of individuals to freedom of expression, even if in this case that expression is the burning of the American flag

Engel v. Vitale  1962  1 st Amendment  Establishment Clause  Eliminated prayers in school  Students cannot be forced to recite a prayer because it violates their 1 st Amendment right to freedom of religion