If you want better answers, ask better questions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Advertisements

1 Friday May 26, Inquiry-Based Lessons in the Technology-Rich Classroom Essential Question: How can teachers incorporate inquiry into the lesson-design.
Learning Taxonomies Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Development
SAIRA FARHAN (D.A.P.S O & A levels sea view). Key Objectives of Intel workshop.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
Creating: can the student create new product or point of view?
BLOOMS TAXONOMY in the Classroom 10/1/11. What is Blooms Taxonomy? What is the revised Blooms Taxonomy? A look at the six Blooms Levels What level are.
Review 3 Documents In groups of 2-3, highlight things students must know and be able to do in the 21 st Century Select a speaker to share your items with.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy Denise Tarlinton July 14, 2003.
Adapted by Susan Muir Created by:DeniseTarlinton.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Levels of Thinking. What is Bloom’s Taxonomy?  A model for examining the different levels of educational activities students are asked.
I can remember basic ideas about a topic. Questions I can Answer -Who? -What? -When? -Where? -Why? -How? -What happened? -Which is True or False? Questions.
Understanding Bloom’s Taxonomy
Presented by Dr. T. Kirshtein Today’s Objectives Review the Revised Bloom’s Matrix. Classify selected state standards according to the Revised Bloom’s.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Sample Questions Task-Based Activities Define each level shallow processing, simply recalling Demonstrate understanding Knowing when and why to apply.
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. (Plutarch)
COMMON ESSAY STYLE QUESTIONS Give a Quotation – Discuss Make an Assertion – Discuss Compare and Contrast Outline… Describe … Explain (with examples) …
Quick Flip Questioning for Critical Thinking Kobets S.A. Lyceum №87.
Increasing Critical Thinking POWER VERBS with. Remembering Level.
Student Learning Outcomes
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
The City School O Levels Economics INSET 2010 The best teachers are those who equip students to THINK for themselves.
Wilkes County Schools Tracee McManus & Nikki Patrick.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Version. Bloom’s Taxonomy of Instructional Activities ( REVISED VERSION – PAGE 52) Create Evaluate Analyze Apply Understand Remember.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Master Trainer : humaira DAPS (O & A LEVELS) SEAVIEW.
Blooms Taxonomy Margaret Gessler Werts Department of Language, Reading, and Exceptionalities.
A Decision-Making Tool.  Goal  Educational Objectives  Student Learning Outcomes  Performance Indicators or Criteria  Learning Activities or Strategies.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies A Guide to Higher Level Thinking Adapted from Ruth Sunda and Kyrene de las Brisas.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Mrs. Eagen A, A. Bloom identified six levels within the cognitive domain, from the simple recall or recognition of facts,
1xx K K K Program Level Student Learning Outcomes K= Knowledge/Comprehension; A= Application / Analysis; S= Synthesis /Evaluation 1xx S K.
COMPREHENSION ANALYSIS EVALUATION APPLICATION SYNTHESIS KNOWLEDGE
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING Unit 5 Seminar. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Original Terms New Terms Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering.
TEMPUS-ELFRUS - Project Meeting, Apri 7-9, Vienna Learning Outcomes I MANSBERGER TEMPUS-ELFRUS Learning Outcomes Reinfried MANSBERGER.
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. (Plutarch)
Original Terms New Terms
Bloom’s Taxonomy OriginalRevised. Remembering The learner is able to recall, restate and remember learned information. –Recognizing –Listing –Describing.
Critical Thinking The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. (Plutarch)
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Question: How many days are in the week?. Question: Why do we need to label and structure time?
Educational Technology Mr. Galusha. What do you teach? “Churchill” and Module 2 Agenda Activators: ‘Disneyland’ Discussion: Changing Paradigms and 21.
A blueprint for learning derived from desired results A course to be run given the end point Planned activities, experiences, assignments for a specific.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Higher Order Skills Bloom's Original Taxonomy Anderson's Revised Taxonomy KnowledgeRemembering ComprehensionUnderstanding ApplicationApplying.
Original Terms New Terms Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering.
Facilitating Higher Order Thinking in Classroom and Clinical Settings Vanneise Collins, PhD Director, Center for Learning and Development Cassandra Molavrh,
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. welcome To Every body.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Presented by Kushal Roy, Asst Prof. ECE Dept HIT
Behavioral Objectives
Using Bloom’s Taxonomy
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Knowledge Arrange Define Duplicate Label List
Assessments for “Remembering” Outcomes
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
BBI 3436 Bloom’s Taxonomy.
? INQUIRY to question is to learn.
Presentation transcript:

If you want better answers, ask better questions. )

Students are engaged only in lower-order thinking; i. e Students are engaged only in lower-order thinking; i.e. they receive, or recite, or participate in routine practice. In no activities during the lesson do students go beyond simple reproduction of knowledge. Students are primarily engaged in routine lower-order thinking for a good share of the lesson. There is at least one significant question or activity in which some students perform some higher-order thinking. Almost all students, almost all of the time are engaged in higher-order thinking.   

Original Terms New Terms Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Creating Evaluating Analysing Applying Understanding Remembering (Based on Pohl, 2000, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 8)

Remembering The learner is able to recall, restate and remember learned information. Recognising Listing Describing Identifying Retrieving Naming Locating Finding   Can you recall information?  

Recall or recognition of specific information Remembering cont’ List Memorise Relate Show Locate Distinguish Give example Reproduce Quote Repeat Label Recall Know Group Read Write Outline Listen Group Choose Recite Review Quote Record Match Select Underline Cite Sort Recall or recognition of specific information Products include: Quiz Definition Fact Worksheet Test Label List Workbook Reproduction Vocabulary

Classroom Roles for Remembering Teacher roles Directs Tells Shows Examines Questions Evaluates Student roles Responds Absorbs Remembers Recognises Memorises Defines Describes Retells Passive recipient

Understanding The learner grasps the meaning of information by interpreting and translating what has been learned. Interpreting Exemplifying Summarising Inferring Paraphrasing Classifying Comparing Explaining   Can you explain ideas or concepts?

Understanding of given information Understanding cont’ Restate Identify Discuss Retell Research Annotate Translate Give examples of Paraphrase Reorganise Associate Describe Report Recognise Review Observe Outline Account for Interpret Give main idea Estimate Define Understanding of given information Products include: Recitation Summary Collection Explanation Show and tell Example Quiz List Label Outline

Classroom Roles for Understanding Teacher roles Demonstrates Listens Questions Compares Contrasts Examines Student roles Explains Describes Outlines Restates Translates Demonstrates Interprets Active participant

Applying  The learner makes use of information in a context different from the one in which it was learned. Implementing Carrying out Using Executing    Can you use the information in another familiar situation?

Using strategies, concepts, principles and theories in new situations Applying cont’ Translate Manipulate Exhibit Illustrate Calculate Interpret Make Practice Apply Operate Interview Paint Change Compute Sequence Show Solve Collect Demonstrate Construct Use Adapt Draw Using strategies, concepts, principles and theories in new situations Products include: Photograph Illustration Simulation Sculpture Demonstration Presentation Interview Performance Diary Journal

Classroom Roles for Applying Teacher roles Shows Facilitates Observes Evaluates Organizes Questions Student roles Solves problems Demonstrates use of knowledge Calculates Compiles Completes Illustrates Constructs Active recipient

Analyzing The learner breaks learned information into its parts to best understand that information. Comparing Organizing Deconstructing Attributing Outlining Finding Structuring Integrating   Can you break information into parts to explore understandings and relationships?

Breaking information down into its component elements Analysing cont’ Compare Contrast Survey Detect Group Order Sequence Test Debate Analyse Diagram Relate Dissect Categorize Discriminate Distinguish Question Appraise Experiment Inspect Examine Probe Separate Inquire Arrange Investigate Sift Research Calculate Criticize Breaking information down into its component elements Products include: Graph Spreadsheet Checklist Chart Outline Survey Database Mobile Abstract Report

Classroom Roles for Analyzing Teacher roles Probes Guides Observes Evaluates Acts as a resource Questions Organises Dissects Student roles Discusses Uncovers Argues Debates Thinks deeply Tests Examines Questions Calculates Investigates Inquires Active participant

Evaluating The learner makes decisions based on in-depth reflection, criticism and assessment. Checking Hypothesising Critiquing Experimenting Judging Testing Detecting Monitoring   Can you justify a decision or course of action?

Evaluating cont’ Judge Rate Validate Predict Assess Score Revise Infer Determine Prioritise Tell why Compare Evaluate Defend Select Measure Choose Conclude Deduce Debate Justify Recommend Discriminate Appraise Value Probe Argue Decide Criticise Rank Reject Judging the value of ideas, materials and methods by developing and applying standards and criteria. Products include: Debate Panel Report Evaluation Investigation Verdict Conclusion Persuasive speech

Classroom Roles for Evaluating Teacher roles Clarifies Accepts Guides Student roles Judges Disputes Compares Critiques Questions Argues Assesses Decides Selects Justifies Active participant

Creating The learner creates new ideas and information using what has been previously learned. Designing Constructing Planning Producing Inventing Devising Making  Can you generate new products, ideas, or ways of viewing things?

Creating cont’ Compose Assemble Organise Invent Compile Forecast Devise Propose Construct Plan Prepare Develop Originate Imagine Generate Formulate Improve Act Predict Produce Blend Set up Devise Concoct Compile Putting together ideas or elements to develop a original idea or engage in creative thinking. Products include: Film Story Project Plan New game Song Newspaper Media product Advertisement Painting

Classroom Roles for Creating Teacher roles Facilitates Extends Reflects Analyses Evaluates Student roles Designs Formulates Plans Takes risks Modifies Creates Proposes Active participant

A good teacher makes you think even when you don’t want to. (Fisher, 1998, Teaching Thinking)