Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon: Problems And Effects IB SL C.C.S: Carbon Capture and Storage.
Advertisements

Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Carbon Dioxide Emission: 24 billion tons per year.
New Technologies for Fossil Fuels By: Carlos J. Vicente Mónica Páez Alessandro Di Nápoli José Pablo Alvarado.
CCS CARBON CAPTURE and SEQUESTRATION PREVENTING CARBON DIOXIDE FROM CONTRIBUTING TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE CA CCS Coalition FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Carbon Sequestration Red Balansay ESS 315. What Is It? Also known as “carbon capture” A geoengineering technique for the long-term storage of carbon dioxide.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module 4: Sleipner Project Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
CO 2 Sequestration Catherine Peters Princeton University Deep Carbon Cycle Workshop May 15-17, 2008 Carnegie Institution Geophysical Laboratory.
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
CO 2 -ISSUES ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS RELATED TO HEAVY CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION AND UPGRADING by Trude Sundset, Statoil R&D Program Manager Energy21.
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Global emissions, Australia’s exports, and Carbon Capture and Storage Tania Constable Chief Executive Officer Grattan Institute and Melbourne Energy Institute.
Lecture 12 Chapter 7 Conclusion Coal Conversion.
Capturing Carbon dioxide Capturing and removing CO 2 from mobile sources is difficult. But CO 2 capture might be feasible for large stationary power plants.
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
Carbon Sequestration Anjani Kumar CPSP218L Dudash
Two environmental Problems Caused by Burning Fossil Fuels
10 years of SLEIPNER CO2 Storage
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Building the CO 2 Value Chain – Is it Possible? Olav Kårstad Special Advisor CO 2 British – Norwegian Workshop on.
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
Fossil Fuels: Their advantages, disadvantages and future
CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Reservoirs
1. Coal 2. Oil 3. Natural Gas Section What is it? Mixture 50–90% Methane (CH 4 ) Ethane (C 2 H 6 ) Propane (C 3 H 8 ) Butane (C 4 H 10 ) Hydrogen.
Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) Michael Nicoletta Chemical Engineering Undergraduate University of Texas at Austin Energy Technology and Policy.
Alexander Voice 24 November  Motivation for the development of CCS technology  Climate change  Energy profile and outlook  Public perception.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Carbon capture and geological sequestration:. Some numbers 40 % carbon emissions from power plants 90 % emission reduction proven operationally Eg. Geological.
Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Visiting Geologists Program. Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Lawrence H. Wickstrom.
Carbon Capture & Storage(CCS)
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
WOC 1 view on the focus and scope regarding CO 2 sequestration in WOC 1 (upstream sector) study area. (according to the experience of CO 2 problem study.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. What is Sequestration? The removal of CO 2 from the atmosphere  Natural –Forests –Oceans –Soils  Artificial.
Carbon Capture and Storage - can it make coal clean? Dr. Shannon Page Department of Environmental Management Lincoln University.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
Olje- og energidepartementet Present Norwegian activities Focus on CCS both as global climate mitigation measure and for EOR-purposes. Valuable.
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
Carbon Dioxide Dr. Reid B. Grigg New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, New Mexico.
R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place.
CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Demonstration at In Salah, Algeria Iain Wright (CO2 Project Manager, BP Group Technology) UNCTAD Africa Oil & Gas Conference.
Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
CO 2 Storage Challenges to the Iron and Steel Industry John Gale General Manager IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Steel Institute VDEh Auditorium D ü sseldorf,
Norwegian Carbon Capture and Storage Projects Helge Lund, President & CEO Capital Markets Update 8 June 2005 Tor Fjæran, Senior Vice President Corporate.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
2002 European Commission - Directorate-General for Research CO2 Strategy.ppt 1 An EU Research Strategy for the Mitigation of CO 2 Emissions An EU Research.
Carbon Capture and Sequestration Graham Friant and Rahul Ramanna Sustainability The main goal of CCS is to increase the sustainability of the current system.
1 Geologic Storage of CO 2 Next Generation Coal Howard Herzog MIT Laboratory for Energy and Environment October 6, 2005.
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module VII: Weyburn, Sask. Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
Status on Norwegian CCS activites Dr. Per Christer Lund, Counsellor Science and Technology, Innovation Norway.
Fig. 16-2, p. 357 Oil and natural gas Floating oil drilling platform Oil storage Coal Contour strip mining Oil drilling platform on legs Geothermal energy.
Visiting Geologists Program
Challenges in Global CCS Projects
Potential for Geological Carbon Sequestration using deep saline aquifers in the Illinois Basin GIS Term Project Julien Botto.
GLOBAL EFFECTS.
Presentation transcript:

Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming

Conclusions  Ultimately CCS is viable only if legislation (international and national) produces a carbon-constrained world.  Legal/Regulatory framework under construction.  CCS industry will be on scale of oil and gas industry (largest in human history).  Expense is uncertain until large scale project completed, but on order of $1 trillion/year to build CCS industry.  Possible with current science and technologies.  Future technological advances will reduce cost, improve efficiency and enhance safety.  More scientific work needs to be done.  There is technical knowledge and experience within petroleum industry.

Carbon (Dioxide) Emissions and Climate Change  Increase in atmosphere is “linked” to climate changes.  There is still no proof of the link.

Carbon Capture and Sequestration  First step is capture of carbon applied to large point sources that currently emit 10,500MtCO 2 /year (e.g. power stations).  CO 2 would be compressed and transported for storage and use.

Large Stationary CO 2 Sources carbon dioxide sources >0.1 MtCO 2 /yr most (75 %) CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion/processing (coal-fired power plants are almost 3 wedges)

Four basic systems  Post combustion  Pre combustion  Oxyfuel  Industrial All gas is mostly CO 2 plus N 2, CO, SO 2, etc. All Methods capture 80-95% of CO 2 Carbon Dioxide Capture

Four basic systems  Pre combustion  Post combustion  Oxyfuel  Industrial Separation stage CO2

Sequestration Targets  Terrestrial  Release into the atmosphere for incorporation into biomass (short term ’s years)  Oceanic  Release into ocean for dissolution and dispersion (medium term – ’s years)  Geologic  Injection into subsurface (long term – 10,000-1,000,000’s years)

Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic

Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic Disposal into deep ocean locations Much of the ocean is deep enough for CO 2 to remain liquid phase (average ocean depth is 12,460 feet) Largest potential storage capacity (2, ,000GtCO 2 – worldwide) Storage time 100’s – 1000’s years Potential ecological damage (pH change) Models and small scale projects only Characteristics

Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic Disposal costs are fairly well known Distance and volume are primary considerations (inverse relationship)

Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic

Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic Disposal into subsurface locations Deep enough to remain supercritical (greater than 2500 feet depth) Large potential storage capacity ( ,000GtCO 2 worldwide) Storage time 10,000’s – 1,000,000’s years Potential ecological damage (point source leaks) 40+ years experience in petroleum EOR operations and sour gas disposal Characteristics

Carbon Dioxide Phase Behavior  Supercritical Fluid is a liquid-like gas  Gas-like viscosity, fluid-like compressibility and solvent behavior  CO 2 above critical T and P (31°C and 73.8 bar or 1085 psi)  Density about 50% of water  Combustion product from fossil fuel  GHG  Four phases of interest

Carbon Storage Geological Sequestration  want to inject to greater than 800 m depth  CO 2 in supercritical state  behaves like a fluid with properties that are mixture of liquid and gas  also stores more in given volume  price to pay in compressing gas

 Terrestrial, Oceanic and Geologic P and T conditions.  Ocean conditions allow disposal of liquid CO 2  Geologic conditions allow disposal of supercritical CO 2 Carbon Dioxide Phase Behavior and Sequestration

 need geologic site that will hold CO 2 safely for 1000s of years – natural analogs  four possible geologic targets  enhanced oil and gas recovery  depleted oil and gas fields  saline aquifers  enhanced CBM recovery Geological Carbon Sequestration

Geological Carbon Sequestration Leakage Paths

CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization  Cost data from IGPCC 2005  Includes cost of compression to pipeline pressure (1500 psi) Separation stage CO2 45% difference

CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization + Transport  Price highly dependent on volume per year.  Includes construction, O&M, design, insurance, right of ways.  for capacities of >5 MtCO2 yr-1 the cost is between 2 and US$/tCO2 per 250km for an onshore pipe Separation stage CO2 37% difference

CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization + Transport + Storage (Oceanic and Geologic)  Oceanic - For transport (ship) distance of km and injection depths of 3000m  Geologic - For storage in onshore, shallow, highly permeable reservoir with pre- existing infrastructure Separation stage CO2 31% difference 23% difference

CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization + Transport + Storage (Oceanic and Geologic) – EOR Offset  Assuming oil price of $50 bbl.  Without Sequestration Credit (Carbon Tax) Separation stage CO2

Pilot Projects  Sleipner, Norway (North Sea)  Weyburn Project, Saskatchewan (Canada)

Pilot Projects: Sleipner  Sleipner is a North Sea gas field  operated by Statoil, Norway’s largest oil company  produces natural gas for European market  in North Sea, hydrocarbons are produced from platforms

Pilot Projects: Sleipner  special platform, Sleipner T, built to separate CO 2 from natural gas  supports 20 m (65 ft) tall, 8,000 ton treatment plant  plant produces 1 million tons of CO 2  also handles gas piped from Sleipner West  Norway has a carbon tax of about $50/ton for any CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere  to avoid the tax, Statoil has re-injected CO 2 underground since production began in 1996

 production is from Heimdal Formation  2,500 m (8,200 ft) below sea level  produces natural gas - mixture of hydrocarbons (methane (CH 4 ), ethane (C 2 H 6 ), butane (C 4 H 10 )), gases (N 2, O 2, CO 2, sulfur compounds, water)  the natural gas at Sleipner has 9 % CO 2 Pilot Projects: Sleipner

 CO 2 injected into Utsira Formation  high porosity & permeability sandstone layer  250 m thick and 800 m (2,600 ft) below sea bed  filled with saline water, not oil or gas  CO 2 storage capacity estimated at 600 billion tons (20 years of world CO 2 emissions)  millions tons CO 2 stored since 1996  first commercial storage of CO 2 in deep, saline aquifer Pilot Projects: Sleipner

 seismic surveys conducted to determine location of CO 2  results shown in diagram to left  Optimum conditions for geophysical imaging Pilot Projects: Sleipner

Conclusions  Ultimately CCS is viable only if legislation (international and national) produces a carbon-constrained world.  Legal/Regulatory framework under construction.  CCS industry will be on scale of oil and gas industry (largest in human history).  Expense is uncertain until large scale project completed, but on order of $1 trillion/year to build CCS industry.  Possible with current science and technologies.  Future technological advances will reduce cost, improve efficiency and enhance safety.  More scientific work needs to be done.  There is technical knowledge and experience within petroleum industry.