Impact of Two Studies on Future of NGC AHRQ Annual Conf Sept 19, 2011 1:30 – 3:00pm.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Assessing the Impact of the IOM Report on the Future of the National Guideline Clearinghouse Richard N. Shiffman, MD, MCIS Yale School of Medicine New.

Advertisements

US Office of Education K

Campus Improvement Plans

Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.

Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.

Good Participatory Practice (GPP) Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials Second Edition 2011.

2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 State Monitoring Under IDEA A Snapshot of Past Practices.

AHRQ Annual Conference September Thank-you to:  Survey respondents  Focus group participants  Key informants  AMIA and ACCP  AHRQ  Mary Nix.

Fiscal Year 2008 Urban Areas Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.

Board of Health (BOH) Governance Working together to improve the public’s health January 2014.

Peer Assessment of 5-year Performance ARS National Program 301: Plant, Microbial and Insect Genetic Resources, Genomics and Genetic Improvement Summary.

Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.

Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.

MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Overview of MICS Tools, Templates, Resources, Technical Assistance.

Topic Generation and Research Prioritization Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH, Executive Director Rachael Fleurence, PhD, Scientist Rick Kuntz, MD, MSc, Chair, PDC.

Kathryn Camp, M.S., R.D., CSP Consultant to the Office of Dietary Supplements National Institutes of Health Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable.

Patients at the Center: Guidelines for Effectiveness Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality New York Academy of Medicine.

From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.

Food Advisory Committee Meeting December 16 and 17, 2014 Questions to the Committee Suzanne C. Fitzpatrick, PhD, DABT Senior Advisory for Toxicology Center.

California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.

Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals.

Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.

BUILDING PROJECT AND THE FEASIBILITY STUDY August 20, 2012 Wachusett Regional High School MOUNTVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL.

Clinical Risk Unit University College London International Perspectives Feedback from the review board Charles Vincent Clinical Risk Unit University College.

1 Crossing the Quality Chasm Second Report Committee on Quality of Health Care in America To order:

Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.

IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS FOR DELIVERY SYSTEM RESEARCH The Challenge and Promise of Delivery System Research: A Meeting of AHRQ Grantees, Experts and Stakeholders.

Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.

Dr Opio C K (TM) Quality assurance at FOM Quality assurance committee.

AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.

Commonwealth Certificate for Teacher ICT Integration.

Next Steps: Implementation Workshop on Standards for Systematic Reviews and Clinical Practice Guidelines Institute of Medicine Sandra Zelman Lewis, PhD.

Quality Management.

PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Data Integration Efforts and Challenges Scott M. Bilder, Ph.D. Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research Rutgers, The State University.

Strategic Plan Review Drawing a Picture & Sharing a Story.

UPDATE TO THE IT GOVERNANCE STEERING COMMITTEE BY THE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY (CBT) NOVEMBER 1, 2012.

SMRB Working Group on Approaches to Assess the Value of Biomedical Research Supported by NIH SMRB Working Group on Approaches to Assess the Value of Biomedical.

Information Technology Investment Management (ITIM) Solomon Negash, Ph.D.

Systematic Reviews and American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guidelines Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP Director, Clinical Policy American College.

July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.

THE IOWA MODEL OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE TO PROMOTE QUALITY CARE Jill Collins, Jerilyn Rodgers, Sandy Siebert & Julie Unruh **please refer to page 252.

Decision Support Aids for Patient/Providers Cathy Melvin Maria Fernandez Jennifer Allen.

Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission

What’s in Store for Us this Year. Thank you, thank you, thank you This is the promised follow up It will take more than one year The vast majority of.

Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP American College of Physicians May 11, 2011.

Fiscal Year 2007 Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.

The Planning Phase Recognize the problem MIS steering committee 7. ManagerSystems analyst Define the problem Set system objectives Identify system constraints.

Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.

Workshop on Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines Institute of Medicine January 11, 2010 Vivian H. Coates, Vice President, ECRI Project Director,

Assessing Logistics System Supply Chain Management 1.

Clinical Practice Guidelines: Can we fix Babel? Eddy Lang Department Chair, Emergency Alberta Health Services Associate Professor University of Calgary.

Development of Community-based Adaptation Project Experiences of the GEF Small grants programme By Stephen Gitonga Climate change Programme officer GEF.

DESIRE – Desertification Mitigation and Remediation of Land DESIRE Work Block 3: Gudrun Schwilch / CDE 1 October 2007 / WB3 Training Workshop Murcia, Spain.

Evaluation What is evaluation?

Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,

Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.

Auditing Sustainable Development Goals

IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN

Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan

Systematic Reviews and Medical Policy Determinations

Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan

Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level

BPEA Advisory Committee

Portfolio Management Process & Customer Request Management

ANFPP National Program Centre

European Institute of Public Administration (NL)

Presentation transcript:

Impact of Two Studies on Future of NGC AHRQ Annual Conf Sept 19, :30 – 3:00pm

What is the NGC?  Online database of structured summaries of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), describing more than 40 attributes of CPGs, including underlying methodology used to develop each guideline  Freely available since 1999; Redesigned site launched July 2010  Currently has summaries for 2600 guidelines from over 200 different guideline developers

Future of NGC Moderator: Mary Nix, AHRQ Moderator: Mary Nix, AHRQ Speakers: Speakers: – Michelle Tregear, AFYA Inc – Rick Shiffman, Yale School of Medicine AHRQ Response: Mary Nix AHRQ Response: Mary Nix Discussants: Panel + You Discussants: Panel + You

Evaluation of NGC program impact Evaluation of NGC program impact – Has NGC had an impact? If so, how? – Not focused on Web site; focused on program IOM study on developing trustworthy guidelines (sister study on systematic review) IOM study on developing trustworthy guidelines (sister study on systematic review) 2 AHRQ-commissioned studies

Michelle Tregear, PhD Rick Shiffman, MD

AHRQ Response IOM Standards for Developing Trustworthy Guidelines IOM Standards for Developing Trustworthy Guidelines – Recommendation: NGC provide clear indication of the extent to which CPGs adhere to standards for trustworthiness Right now: Right now: – Over 2600 guidelines summaries from 203 developers – How many would meet all the IOM standards for trustworthiness? – Zero!

Response to IOM It is not practical or possible for NGC to implement the IOM Committee’s recommendation immediately and across the board. It is not practical or possible for NGC to implement the IOM Committee’s recommendation immediately and across the board.

Response to IOM NGC will be providing the indication NGC will be providing the indication 1. Working with experts to prioritize 2. Assessing methods, web options 3. Determining when

Response to IOM: specifics NGC Team: NGC Team: – Plan to phase in documenting adherence, starting with 3 to 5 that seem feasible and most critical to ensure trustworthiness. Inputs from experts Inputs from experts – Conduct a small pilot using recent guidelines to determine which IOM standards they meet and where they fall short. – Make recommendations to AHRQ regarding how to proceed with implementation.

Key Response to IOM

AHRQ Response Evaluation Study – AHRQ Opportunities Evaluation Study – AHRQ Opportunities – Increase physician awareness of NGC – Revisit NGC’s inclusion criteria – Revisit NGC’s age criterion – Increase knowledge among guideline developers about how to create and report trustworthy guidelines – Identify additional efforts to enhance the dissemination of guidelines – Invest in major enhancements that will increase the value of NGC

Evaluation Study Response AHRQ will work with the NGC team on: AHRQ will work with the NGC team on: – Major enhancements (over next 2 years) Customized site, (my NGC, my NQMC) Customized site, (my NGC, my NQMC) Indicate trustworthiness Indicate trustworthiness – Adopting IOM definition – Exploring changing inclusion criteria Systematic review Systematic review Aging Aging

Evaluation Study Response AHRQ will consider in context of extremely tight budget AHRQ will consider in context of extremely tight budget – Best ways to raise awareness among physicians – Additional mechanisms for dissemination – Its and NGC’s role in helping guideline developers create and report trustworthy guidelines

QUESTIONS??