Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi and Atchafalaya River Basins (MARB) Dale Robertson, Richard Alexander, and David Saad U.S. Geological Survey USGS/USEPA.
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer
SPARROW Watershed Modeling of the Entire Great Lakes Basin IAGLR Conference, McMaster University May 29, 2014 (608) By Dale.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
St. Albans Bay Landscape Modeling Stakeholder Working Group Meeting 4 Phosphorus Dynamics Scenario Development St. Albans Town Hall November 9, 2005.
Scenario Builder and Watershed Model Progress toward the MPA Gary Shenk, Guido Yactayo, Gopal Bhatt Modeling Workgroup 12/2/14 1.
Contaminant Source and Watershed Characterization Data Needs Gregory McIsaac, Robert Howarth, and Richard B. Alexander Univ. of Illinois Cornell Univ.
Estimating the Sources and Transport of Nitrogen in the Mississippi River Basin Using Spatially Referenced Modeling Techniques R.B. Alexander, R.A. Smith,
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Water Quality Modeling in GIS Application of Schematic Network Processing Schema Links and Nodes have unique behaviors based on their type A framework.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Obtaining the goals.  Identify realistic future use of all water bodies – drinking water, irrigation water, livestock watering, bathing, fishing, recipient.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
Nutrient Loading from Point and Non-Point Sources on Surface Waters by Adam Lanning.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Chowan River TMDL Development Raccoon/Sappony Area 09/8/04.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
VIII. Watershed Protection - A comprehensive management approach.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey StreamStats: A Web-Based Tool for Estimating Streamflow Statistics by Alan Rea Idaho Water Science.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
Forecasting changes in water quality and aquatic biodiversity in response to future bioenergy landscapes in the Arkansas-White-Red River basin Peter E.
Iowa Nutrient Load Estimations for Point and Non-point Sources Iowa DNR November 14, 2012.
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Hydrologic and Water Quality Modeling of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Huan.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Invest Nutrient Retention model Yonas Ghile.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Estimating future scenarios for farm-watershed nutrient fluxes using dynamic simulation modelling – Can on-farm BMPs really do the job at the watershed.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
Chowan River TMDL Development Blackwater Area 09/07/04.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Working with the USGS 6/19/2009.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Chowan River TMDL Development Nottoway Area 08/31/04.
Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Austin Weidner CE394K : GIS.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Bayesian SPARROW Model Song Qian Ibrahim Alameddine The University of Toledo American University of Beirut.
Modeling Support for Attoyac Bayou Watershed– SELECT
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
Presentation transcript:

Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey Portland, OR

USGS SPARROW Model SPAtially Referenced Regression On Watershed attributes. SPARROW is a powerful tool for informing water-quality management decisions.

SPARROW Model Description SPARROW relates water-quality measurements to watershed characteristics, including contaminant sources and factors influencing terrestrial and stream transport. The model uses a process-based mass balance of load in combination with a spatially explicit nonlinear multiple regression on watershed attributes.

SPARROW Model Description Point Sources Delivery to Waterways Instream Processing Landscape Loading Export Settling Biological Uptake Overland Flow Subsurface Flow SPARROW is Process-Based Nonpoint Sources

SPARROW Model Description SPARROW Water-quality monitoring data Regional geospatial data Region-wide water quality interpretation and predictions Hydrologic network data SPARROW is Spatially Explicit

SPARROW Model Description SPARROW is Spatially Explicit

SPARROW Model Description The fundamental component of the SPARROW model is the stream reach and its associated incremental catchment. Reaches begin at all stream confluences and at the locations of calibration sites An incremental catchment is the area that drains directly to a reach without passing through another reach

SPARROW Model Description Detailed predictions made for every stream reach: 1)Mean annual load (kg/yr) 2)Mean annual conc. (mg/L) 3)Source contribution to load

SPARROW Model Description Pacific Nortwest 12,039 individual reaches and associated incremental catchments Willamette River Basin 755 individual reaches and associated incremental catchments

U.S.G.S. SPARROW Nutrient Models

PNW Study Area

Using SPARROW to Model Surface-Water Nutrients

Sources of Nutrients Nutrient loading to the land Background Sources

Sources of Nutrients Nutrient loading to the land Background Sources Urbanization

Sources of Nutrients Nutrient loading to the land Background Sources Urbanization Agriculture

How can SPARROW results be used? Predicting water-quality conditions where no water-quality data are available Predicting contaminant delivery by source type and location Predicting changes in water-quality conditions under different management scenarios Designing water-quality monitoring programs

How can SPARROW results be used? Predicting water-quality conditions where no water-quality data are available Predicting contaminant delivery by source type and location Predicting changes in water-quality conditions under different management scenarios Designing water-quality monitoring programs

Largest Sources of Total Nitrogen Load Generated within Incremental Catchments (2002)

Contribution from Different Sources to Total Nitrogen Load Discharged from the Willamette Basin (2002) Source Category Source Contribution (percent) Point Sources 30.0 Farm Fertilizer 27.2 Forest Land 12.9 Livestock Manure 10.9 Developed Land 9.3 Red Alder Trees 6.8 Atmospheric 2.8

How can SPARROW results be used? Predicting water-quality conditions where no water-quality data are available Predicting contaminant delivery by source type and location Predicting changes in water-quality conditions under different management scenarios Designing water-quality monitoring programs

Yakima River Management Scenarios 50% Reduction in Upstream Point Source Loading to Streams Adjusted TP Load 186 tons/yr (-26 tons/yr) 50% Reduction in Upstream Fertilizer and Manure Loading to Land Adjusted TP Load 196 tons/yr (-16 tons/yr) Yakima River (212 tons TP/yr) Source Contribution (percent) Geologic Material 53.6 Farm Fertilizer and Livestock Manure 16.5 Point Sources 24.4 Developed Land 5.5

SPARROW Outreach and Communication Publication of article in Journal of the American Water Resources Association (August, 2011) Surface-Water Nutrient Conditions and Sources in the United States Pacific Northwest Daniel R. Wise 1 and Henry M. Johnson 2

SPARROW Outreach and Communication Web-based Decision Support System Display detailed model results Run water-quality management scenarios Identify major players (sources and areas)

PNW SPARROW Next Phase Migration from RF1 to NHD Stream Network Willamette River Basin RF1 NHD 755 catchments 10,198 catchments

PNW SPARROW Next Phase Point Sources WWTP’s Fish Hatcheries Industrial Facilities New or Refined Source Nonpoint Sources Farm Fertilizer Dairies and Feedlots Grazing Cattle Other Livestock Nonsewered Population Land-Applied Wastewater Biosolids Application Atmospheric N Deposition Geologic Phosphorus Marine-Derived Nutrients Improved Nutrient Source Estimates

SPARROW Input Geoprocessing Example Landscape Nutrient Loadings from Dairies and Feedlots Use available information: USDA agricultural census (county level) State depts of agriculture Business directories National landcover data base Confined cattle waste distributed to farmland based on proximity to dairies and feedlots.

SPARROW Input Geoprocessing Example Landscape nutrient loadings from confined cattle summarized for each SPARROW incremental catchment.

Questions? Contact: Daniel Wise: USGS OR Water Science Center ;