BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Provisional Estimates of FAF O-D Freight Flows by Highway Charlie Han MacroSys Research and Technology May 15, 2007.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 ANALYZING LONG-DISTANCE TRUCK TRAVEL FOR STATEWIDE FREIGHT PLANNING IN OHIO Presented by:
The Office for Freight, Logistics and Transportation Development of a Method to Forecast Freight Demand Arising from the Final Demand Sector and Examination.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
TransCAD Network Settings 2017/4/17.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
The Evolving Needs Challenges and Experiences in Statewide Modeling Alan Horowitz University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
ODOT Freight Modeling Presented to the Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, OH September 18, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, PE Ohio Department of Transportation.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Border Data Warehouse. Vancouver, BC Bellingham, WA The Cascade Gateway.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Freight Impacts on Ohio ’ s Roadways presented by Suzann S. Gad, AICP The Ohio Depart Of Transportation Office of Urban & Corridor Planning.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
FAF 2 The Second Generation of Freight Analysis Framework Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration Tianjia Tang, PE,
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
A Tour-Based Urban Freight Transportation Model Based on Entropy Maximization Qian Wang, Assistant Professor Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Freight Demand Analysis
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Freight Demand Analysis
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 2 Task Flow Task #1 Update the FAF Network Link Attributes Data Task 2 Pre-Assign non-FAF Traffic Counts Task 3 Truck Trips, Payload and PCE Factors Task 4 FAF3 Assignments Task 5 FAF3 Forecast Year Assignments Task 6 Documentation Deliverable #1 FAF3 Network Deliverable #2 FAF3 Network with 2007 Assignments Deliverable #3 FAF3 Network with 2040 Forecast Assignments Deliverable #4 Technical Report

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 3 Process Description Task 1: Update FAF3 Highway Network Updating of the FAF3 network for NHS, Intermodal connectors, and urban by-pass other State specific sources for major highway realignment. Integration and updating of NN designation, NHS designation changes (up to-date March 2010), LCV network designation, state truck and hazmat route designation, state truck route restriction, limited bridge clearance Task 2: Pre-Assigning non-FAF Traffic Counts to the FAF3 Network Integrate HPMS 2008 data with FAF3 network using a series of state specific route matching algorithms customized for each State. Develop algorithms to translate the HPMS traffic-flow information to the FAF network domain Calibrate state traffic flows and truck percentage at the state and urban boundaries Task 3: Truck Trips, Payload and Passenger Car Equivalency Factors Revise FAF-2 algorithms and factors using the TEP project completed for FHWA in Update the conversion tools developed by Battelle during FAF-2 to reflect the new changes in FAF-3 zone and gateways system and the range of operation by truck classes Develop Truck based O-D matrix using the TEP and allocation of tonnage by truck classes.

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 4 Process Description Task 4: Assignment of FAF3 Flows to the Highway Network Develop and update FAF-2 link specific Impedance factors Develop and identify disaggregation network specific nodes to develop 123 by 123 OD matrix to 4609 by 4609 O-D matrix Develop disaggregation factors for domestic and international movements. Use TransCAD SUE traffic assignment with passenger volume as preloaded volume on the network Calibrate flow by adjusting initial link impedance, alpha, beta values, and disaggregation factors Use BPR delay functions Multiple trial and error iteration until FAF truck flows is comparable with the state truck flows develop in task 2 Compare HPMS truck VMT with the FAF truck VMT for the base year 2007

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 5 FAF Tonnages to Truck Conversion steps 12/15/2015 Identify vehicle groups Calculate TEF -National -Regional Select major body types Calculate percent distribution by vehicle group and body type Calculate mean payloads by vehicle group and body type Calibrate mean payloads (e.g. VTRIS weight data) Analyze Regional variability

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 6 12/15/ Vehicle Groups 1.Straight trucks 2.Straight truck plus trailer 3.Tractor plus trailer 4.Tractor plus double trailers 5.Tractor plus triple trailers

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 7 12/15/2015 Major Body Types Platform (24.4%) Logging (2.1%) Tank (7.9%) Reefer (8.2%) Other (2.3%) Automobile (0.9%) Livestock (1.7%) Bulk (14.7%) Dry Van (37.7%)

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 8 12/15/ Conversion Algorithms X i tons of commodity i carried by truck type Y j and body type k = X i β ijk Number of truck type Y j and body type k to move X i β ijk tons commodity i = X i β ijk / ω ijk β ijk = fraction of commodity i moved by truck type j with body type k ω ijk = mean payload of commodity i by truck type j body type k

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 9 12/15/2015 FAF3: Task 3 Truck Trips, Payload and PCE 9 Conversion Algorithms - Continue

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 10 BUSINESS SENSITIVE FAF-3 Freight Travel Demand Model FAF 3 O-D (123 by 123 zones) Trip Distribution Impedance Function Calibration (Use FAF -2 base TLD) Domestic International Develop O-D Share County-to-County FAF 2 O-D Matrix Disaggregation Techniques Proportioning -Truck Volume - CBP -warehouse cluster Logistical Impacts Tri-Proportional Gravity Model Gamma (combined) Function Model Validity Test Inflow/Outflow FAF 3 Network Assignment (SUE) The dotted loop portion of the figure indicates that the process is iterative until a best possible solution is accomplished Disaggregate by Domestic, Port and Border Crossings Step 1 Step 2 Step 3

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 11 Border Crossings Trip O-D nodes

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 12 Inlands and Deep Water Trip O-D nodes

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 13 FAF-3 Truck Trip O-D nodes

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 14 Domestic Flow (Preliminary)