Office of Aviation Safety Operations Captain Dave Kirchgessner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIR OPERATOR SURVEILLANCE. OBJECTIVES Determine compliance with regulatory requirements - safe practices Detecting changes in operational environment.
Advertisements

APPROVAL OF CHECK AIRMEN AND FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR
EMERGENCY EVACUATION.
1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.
Wings Program Crosswind Takeoffs & Landings Chuck Pinney, CFIG Loss of directional control in takeoff & landings are #2 & #1 in order of aircraft accident.
Check Airman Responsibilities and Evaluations
Colgan Air Flight 3407 Clarence Center, New York
Survival Factors Cindy Keegan.
Flight Standards Flight Program
Office of Aviation Safety FOQA Programs, FAA Oversight, and SAFO Process Operations presentation.
Can Commercial Airlines Achieve “One Level of Safety” By Embarking on a Program of “One Level of Training” ? What is the relationship between Training.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Breakout Session I: Regulatory Landscape April 26, 2010 Regional.
FORM 5 / FORM 91 CHECK RIDES FORM 5 / FORM 91 CHECK RIDES n Regulations pertinent to conduct of a check ride n Form 5/5G Check Ride Procedures n Form 91.
Office of Aviation Safety Maryland State Police Trooper 2 District Heights, MD Jill Demko Operations Group Chairman Malcolm Brenner, Ph.D. Human Performance.
Runway Incursion’s Affect on FAA Approved Pilot Training and Pilot and Flight Instructor Certification and Part 121 Pilot Checking – Andy Edwards – Manager.
Accident Summary Cargo smoke warning during approach to PHL Smoke filled cockpit after landing Crew evacuated via slide at left forward (L1) door Major.
AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING
FAR Part 61.
1. Instrument Rating Requirements §61.65(a) 1.Hold at least a Private Pilot Certificate 2.Be able to read, speak, write and understand English 3.Receive.
Ujaval Patel General Regulatory Requirements Flight Crew Regulations Flight Crew Scheduling.
FAA Industry Training Standards FITS Overview. 2 Outline FAA Industry Training Standards Problems with Current Training FITS Flight Training Scenario.
Presented to: HAI FIRC By: Hooper Harris, Manager, AFS-250 Date:February 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Operational Control Operations Specification.
Part 135 Safety Summit WELCOME CELL PHONES – VIBRATE OR OFF REST ROOMS – IN FOYER NEXT TO ELEVATOR FSDO MANAGER – TYRONE GILLIARD.
21 Jul 02, C-182R, Runway 35, wind 030/09 Training while returning from SAREX Pilot flying an ILS under the hood - CFI was safety pilot Everything looked.
ORLANDO FLIGHT STANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE FLIGHT TRAINING SAFETY & SECURITY PARTNERSHIP.
Chapter 8 Instructor Responsibilities and Professionalism.
Federal Aviation Regulations
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Downloaded from AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS’ LESSON PLAN.
Safety Report Treatment of Safety-Critical Systems in Transport Airplanes Office of Research and Engineering.
Office of Aviation Safety Air Tahoma Flight 185 Convair 580 August 13, 2004 Covington, Kentucky.
Office of Aviation Safety Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Aviation Operations Jeff Guzzetti Deputy Director for Regional Operations.
Office of Research and Engineering Safety Study Report: Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft Qualitative Analysis Results Loren Groff.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
A FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS GUIDE FOR SOLOING A STUDENT PILOT.
1 Fred Cleveland - Chief Operations Officer February 20, 2013.
Office of Aviation Safety Pilot Professionalism Human Performance presentation.
Self Inspection Program
Office of Aviation Safety Operations Captain Roger Cox.
Office of Aviation Safety US Airways Flight 1549 Ditching on the Hudson River January 15, 2009 Katherine Wilson, Ph.D. Human Performance Capt. David Helson.
Presented to: Central Florida Pilots By: FAASTeam Date: 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from FAASTeam Presentation The Flight.
Office of Aviation Safety Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri Lorenda Ward Investigator-in-Charge.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Topic of the Month January Flight Data Monitoring.
Office of Aviation Safety Response to Stick Shaker and Stall Human Performance presentation.
Presented to: CFI Workshops By: FAASTeam Date: April 1, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration CFI Workshop 7 Core Topic 14 Flight Review.
Office of Aviation Safety Airspeed Selection and Stall Training Procedures Operations presentation.
Flight Mission MPTS IJET CO 3102 OFT Cockpit Orientation Simulator 1.5 hours OFT.
Office of Aviation Safety Opening Remarks Joseph Sedor.
EVALUATION. VIDEO -WHATS FOR LUNCH GENERAL AVIATION PILOT EXAMINER REVIEW  30% TO 40% OF REGIONS GENERAL AVIATION PILOT EXAMINERS ARE NOT CONDUCTING.
Office of Aviation Safety Flight Crew Performance: Operational and Human Factors Katherine A. Lemos, Ph.D. Human Performance Group Chairman Operational.
National Transportation Safety Board Operations Captain David Tew Operations Group Chairman Captain David Tew Operations Group Chairman.
ORLANDO FSDO-15 FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SPECIAL EMPHASIS PROGRAM.
Office of Aviation Safety Aircraft Maintenance and Inspections.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office Designee Handbook, Order & Inspector’s Handbook,
ORLANDO FSDO-15 FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SPECIAL EMPHASIS PROGRAM.
12/4/2016 Pilot Proficiency Award Program “Wings” By: Bill Hoenstine Safety Program Manager Orlando FSDO.
Office of Aviation Safety Flight Crew Performance.
Office of Aviation Safety Delta Connection Flight 6448 Operated by Shuttle America Human Performance Issues.
Captain Larry Neal Senior Manager Flight Training Comair, Inc. The Next Generation of Training.
Office of Aviation Safety Human Performance Bombardier CRJ-200 Pinnacle Airlines Traverse City, Michigan April 12, 2007.
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Safety Study Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft March 9, NTSB Glass Cockpit Findings.
Presented to: FASMT By: AAM-510 Date: April 15, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Checking AMCS Vitals: Airman Satisfaction Survey 2014 Results.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office Flight Instructor Special Emphasis Program CFI /
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing August 9, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
ORLANDO FLIGHT SRANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE
Flight training • aircraft rentals • aircraft transitions • aircraft management • mentor pilots • pilot services.
NIGHT FORMATION SIMULATOR 1.5 HOURS/X
CAP Pilot Continuation Training
Instructor Responsibilities and Professionalism
SFAR 88 (EAPAS) Workshop Talking Points
Presentation transcript:

Office of Aviation Safety Operations Captain Dave Kirchgessner

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Operational Factors Flight crew performance FedEx actions after accident

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance No flare, left crab, right of centerline Landing inconsistent with training Crosswind landing techniques and flare were trained and practiced

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance Crosswinds within airplane / flight crew’s capabilities FedEx flight training adequate

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance Operational factors – Fatigue – FAA pilot certification – FAA medical certification – Wind conditions – MD-11 / MD-10 differences

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance First Officer’s History Previous employer (1994) – Two proficiency checkride failures – FAA reexamination

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance First Officer’s History Hired by FedEx in 1996 MD-11 type rating in 1998 Two unsatisfactory proficiency checkrides No deficiencies directly related to performance on day of accident

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance Check Airman’s Performance Check airman and pilot-in-command Responsibilities – Monitor First Officer’s performance – Ensure safe conduct of the flight

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance Check Airman’s Performance MD-11 simulator Replicated FDR data Cockpit observations – Flight control inputs – Left crab – Drift – No flare

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Flight Crew Performance Check Airman’s Performance Possible corrective actions – Verbal instruction – Command a go around – Take over flight controls No corrective actions taken

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN FedEx Actions Enhanced Oversight Program – Pilots requiring additional training – Pilots with unsatisfactory checkrides Monitored for at least 1 year Receive additional line checks

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN FedEx Actions Monthly pilot reviews Database Vice President of Flight Operations involvement Address and correct deficiencies

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN Summary Poorly executed landing techniques First Officer performance deficiencies Captain’s inactions Enhanced Oversight Program

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN SUMMARY Programs that assess flight crewmember deficiencies are beneficial

FedEx Flight 647, Memphis, TN