By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Advertisements

The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
What Does Rigor Look Like?
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Writing a Usable and Working Curriculum Background with Step-by- Step Guidance.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Verona Public Schools Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
“Hands-On” Activity Please use the materials (pencils, index cards, tape) and whatever else you might find helpful, to get a copy of your fingerprint.
Building Students’ Deep Understanding through a Common Core-Aligned Unit Setting the Stage  Reflect on planning and pedagogical practices in context of.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
The Common Core: Next Steps
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Teachers Helping Teachers Align Units with the Common Core/ Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy September 24, 2012 Presented by Elin Reuben Karma.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
Video 5: Mapping the Terrain: What Should They Know About It and How Deeply?
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Benjamin Bloom (et al.) created this taxonomy for categorizing levels of abstraction of questions.
Higher Order Thinking Skills
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
THE C OMMON C ORE, & C OGNITIVE R IGOR Language Arts Council Meetings Fall 2012 Adapted from Karin K. Hess materials.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
And PARCC
Facilitating Higher Order Thinking in Classroom and Clinical Settings Vanneise Collins, PhD Director, Center for Learning and Development Cassandra Molavrh,
Technology: A Tool for Digging Deeper Into Content Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D. West Baton Rouge Parish Schools Region 2 Mini-LACUE.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Are your students thinking more deeply or just working harder
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Definitions & Examples
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
A guide to reading, writing, thinking and understanding
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
When It Rains Rigor The puddles are deeper!
Preplanning Presentation
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels
Higher Order Thinking Skills
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Classifying Questions
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

By Benjamin Newman

 Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with Common Core.  Understand how the Hess Matrix applies the principles of (DOK) and Blooms.  Identify the (DOK) level of lessons and activities.  Analyze assessment questions and materials using the Hess Matrix.

 Take a minute to write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” or “cognitive demand” as it relates to instruction, learning, and/or assessment.

Blooms Webb’s (DOK) ?

A Memorize Facts, Definitions, Formulas E Solve Non-Routine Problems, Make Connections B Perform Procedures C Demonstrate Understanding of Mathematical Ideas D Conjecture, Analyze, Generalize, Prove

Different states/schools/teachers use different models to describe cognitive rigor. Each addresses something different.  Bloom –What type of thinking (verbs) is needed to complete a task?  Webb –How deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? How complex is the content?

Knowledge—Define, duplicate, label, list, name, order, recognize, relate, recall Remember—Retrieve knowledge from long- term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify Comprehension—Classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate recognize, report, review, select, translate Understand—Construct meaning, clarify, paraphrase, represent, translate, illustrate, give examples, classify, categorize, summarize, generalize, predict… Application—Apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, practice, write Apply—Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation; carry out or use/apply to an unfamiliar task Analysis—Analyze, appraise, explain, calculate, categorize, compare, criticize discriminate, examine Analyze—Break into constituent parts, determine how parts relate Synthesis—Rearrange, assemble, collect, compose, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, write Evaluate—Make judgments based on criteria, check, detect inconsistencies/fallacies, critique Evaluation—Appraise, argue, assess, choose, compare, defend, estimate, explain, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value Create—Put elements together to form a coherent whole, reorganize elements into new patterns/structures

 DOK-1 – Recall & Reproduction - Recall of a fact, term, principle, concept, or perform a routine procedure  DOK-2 - Basic Application of Skills/Concepts - Use of information, conceptual knowledge, select appropriate procedures for a task, two or more steps with decision points along the way, routine problems, organize/display data, interpret/use simple graphs  DOK-3 - Strategic Thinking - Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps to approach problem; requires some decision making and justification; abstract, complex, or non-routine; often more than one possible answer  DOK-4 - Extended Thinking - An investigation or application to real world; requires time to research, problem solve, and process multiple conditions of the problem or task; non-routine manipulations, across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources

 The intended student learning outcome determines the DOK level. What mental processing must occur?  While verbs may appear to point to a DOK level, it is what comes after the verb that is the best indicator of the rigor/DOK level.  Describe the physical features of a plant.  Describe how the two political parties are alike and different.  Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe.

 If there is only one correct answer, it is probably level DOK 1 or DOK 2  DOK 1: you either know it (can recall it, locate it, do it) or you don’t  DOK 2 (conceptual): apply one concept, then make a decision before going on applying a second concept  If more than one solution/approach, requiring evidence, it is DOK 3or 4  DOK 3: Must provide supporting evidence and reasoning (not just HOW solved, but WHY – explain reasoning)  DOK 4: all of “3” + use of multiple sources or texts

Depth + thinking Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember -Recall, locate basic facts, details, events Not appropriate at this level Understand -Select appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident -Specify or explain relationships -summarize -identify central idea -Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence (quote, example…) -Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts Apply -Use language structure (pre/suffix) or word relationships (synonym/antonym) to determine meaning -Use context to identify meaning of word -Obtain and interpret information using text features -Use concepts to solve non- routine problems -Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem Analyze -Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, etc. -Compare literary elements, terms, facts, events -analyze format, organization, & text structures -Analyze or interpret author’s craft (literary devices, viewpoint, or potential bias) to critique a text -Analyze multiple sources -Analyze complex/abstract themes Evaluate -Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures -Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information Create -Brainstorm ideas about a topic -Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge -Synthesize information within one source or text -Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts

 (DOK) Depth of Knowledge is about how deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? How complex is the content?  Blooms is about what type of thinking (verbs) is needed to complete a task?  The Hess Matrix lets you think about both of those things at once.