Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Advertisements

Environmental Studies Mr. Skirbst Science Topic 28.
David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 7 Stream Systems on Dynamic Earth Floodplain Management Principles & Practice Prepared By Donald R. Reichmuth, PhD.
Reclamation Case Studies of Dam Removal Cassie C. Klumpp.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Assessment of gravel transport characteristics of the upper Santa Ana River Scott Wright and Toby Minear USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento,
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Channel Repair of Montezuma Creek in Coronado National Memorial following Fire and Flood Damage Stephanie Yard, P.E. & Allen Haden, Aquatic Ecologist Natural.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
Mitigation Categories 3 and 4 February 15,  Reminders:  Mitigation Category 3  WWH – GHQW  CWH – Inland Trout Streams  Class III PHWH  Mitigation.
MCDEP’s Database Conversion Overview Benthic MonitoringFish Monitoring Rapid Habitat Geomorphology Physchem Herpetofauna Spring MonitoringSummer Monitoring.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP). Background to RBP changes in community/assemblage composition used to evaluate existence and degree of impact.
ESM 228: Environmental Field Methods Winter 2008 Instructor: Tim Robinson TA: José Constantine Lauren Bauer, Chris Helmer, Reni Keane-Dengel, Anne Middleton,
Influence of Geomorphic Complexity on Hyporheic Flow and Nutrient Processing Prepared by Dan Baker for CE 413.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Stream Crossings: Effects on Streams at Fort Riley Military Installation Gilbert Malinga 1, James Steichen 1, Stacy Hutchinson 1,Phillip Woodford 2, Tim.
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
To what extent is there excess sediment in the Middle Truckee River that impairs aquatic life use? Application of benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment.
Modern Urbanized Stream Water Quality Improvement Technologies Creating a Net Zero Water Quality Impact Solution in the Natural Environment.
Regional/National Sediment Yields: Application of Fundamental Fluvial Geomorphic Techniques for TMDLs National Sedimentation Laboratory Andrew Simon USDA-ARS.
Hat Creek Restoration Project Hat Creek Restoration ProjectHatRAC PresentationOctober 29, 2013 Prepared by Geomorphic Assessment and Preliminary Plans.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
STREAM ECOSYSTEMS.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
Processing of a Fine Sediment Pulse after Dam Removal Sediment Budget and Longitudinal Trends Chiloquin Dam Removal – Sprague River Matt Cox, Desiree Tullos,
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
Basic Hydrology Water Quality: Sediment production and transport.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS Flowing water Moving continuously in one direction. Headwaters- Where the river or streams begin. Rivers are created in two ways: 1.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on Nesting Tree Swallows.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling. Sampling -WHAT All available invertebrate taxa in the entire 200 foot stream reach -WHERE All available habitats in.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
1. Water Trust Board Grant Agreement Scope and Objectives: Removal of islands below the Isleta Diversion Dam Restore this reach of the Rio Grande to the.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Impact Analysis. Impact Analysis (204) ODOT attempts to avoid, and minimize impacts to the natural environment throughout the PDP process Despite these.
13. Sediment and aquatic habitat in rivers (a)Benthic organisms and bed sediments (b)Fish and bed sediments (c)Reach classification based on bed material.
USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES TO ASSESS WATER QUALITY IN BOLIN CREEK David Lenat Lenat Consulting Services.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
STREAM ECOLOGY.
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Streams Hydrodynamics
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science Center

Problem Concerns have arisen concerning the use of culverts at highway crossings of streams. The primary concerns are the culvert’s impact on: Stream Geomorphology Suspended Sediment Concentrations Turbidity Stream Biology/Ecology

Study Design ALDOT and USGS are conducting a scientific investigation to determine the impacts of culverts on streams. Evaluate 8 to 10 proposed culvert construction sites. Before, during, and post construction Coastal Plain sites Basins having little to no anthropogenic influence (stable streams) are targeted. Data will be used to improve culvert installation, if possible.

Site Selection Eight sites located in Lamar, Tuscaloosa, Bibb, Russell, Choctaw, and Clarke Counties. Drainage areas range from 0.39 to 16.4 mi 2 Channel slopes range from 9 to 65 ft./mi Channel widths range from 12 to 35 ft. Stream Ecology Site

Stream Geomorphology Changes in channel banks, bed, and slope. Scour and fill Reach length 20 times the channel width (22 cross sections) Reach upstream and downstream of proposed culvert Pre-construction survey and 2 years post- construction survey

Streamflow, Turbidity, and Suspended Sediment Concentrations Event-driven (storm events) Site specific – upstream vs. downstream comparison For different flow magnitudes For pre-construction, construction, and post- construction sampling periods

Potential Effects of Poor Culvert Design or Placement Barriers to animal passage Fish Invertebrates Loss of riparian and instream habitat complexity Reduced downstream movement of large woody debris Scouring due to increased velocities Thermal differences Increased algal growth in response to loss of riparian cover Shifts in invertebrate communities to scrapers and grazers

Benthic Macroinvertebrates Sampled as indicator of stream biological/ecological health Important for food chain Indicator for measuring sedimentation impact Both population and diversity important Site specific – upstream vs. downstream comparison For pre-construction and post-construction sampling periods

Collect & identify benthic invertebrates at cross- sections above and below the culvert. Collect & identify benthic invertebrates at cross- sections above and below the culvert. Use functional feeding group information to look at community changes caused by existence of the culvert Use functional feeding group information to look at community changes caused by existence of the culvert Spring/summer collections before and after culvert construction Spring/summer collections before and after culvert construction Approach

Methods Visual survey of available instream habitats both upstream & downstream. Collection of invertebrates by netting, scraping, brushing from the richest habitats available.

Methods 500-micron mesh nets and sieves Composite sample into 5 gallon buckets Reduced sample volume as much as possible by inspection and removal of larger woody debris Attempt to keep upstream and downstream sampling efforts comparable Same number of woody snags, length of root/bank, etc. Similar amount of sampling time

USGS National Water Quality Laboratory Biological Unit 100-counts of invertebrates were identified from each sample by the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory in Denver, Colorado

The Invertebrate Data Analysis System – IDAS Summarizes invertebrate data Calculates sample metrics Self-archives settings and stores output in Excel files

Comparison of upstream and downstream reaches at each site Comparison of upstream and downstream reaches at each site Are differences observed at all or some of the sites? Are differences observed at all or some of the sites? Analysis

Abundance – numbers of individuals Total Numbers of Taxa EPT Taxa – Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera Tolerance to impaired water quality Functional Feeding Groups Similarity Indices Community Metrics

Oakmulgee

Oakmulgee

Northington Branch

Tributary to Cahaba

Most sites have relatively pollution intolerant communities, good abundance and taxa richness values. Most sites have relatively pollution intolerant communities, good abundance and taxa richness values. Upstream and downstream samples did not reflect nearly identical communities like we had expected. Upstream and downstream samples did not reflect nearly identical communities like we had expected. Feeding group structure seems to show promise as a way to identify changes in the site pairs. Feeding group structure seems to show promise as a way to identify changes in the site pairs. Preliminary Findings

Continue working with this data to see if we can find better ways to see differences and similarities. Continue working with this data to see if we can find better ways to see differences and similarities. Summarize taxa in different ways (ambiguous taxa, metrics at a different taxonomic level) Summarize taxa in different ways (ambiguous taxa, metrics at a different taxonomic level) Look at the changes in this data along with geomorphology and sediment transport data. Look at the changes in this data along with geomorphology and sediment transport data. Prepare to do post-construction sampling using what we have already learned about these sites. Prepare to do post-construction sampling using what we have already learned about these sites. Next Steps

Questions?

Open canopy Sand and gravel substrate Overhanging vegetation Small woody debris Northington Branch

Lye Branch

Some of our “Catch” from Oakmulgee Creek.

Effects of Culverts on the Natural Conditions of Streams in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of Alabama

Site Selection Eight sites located in Lamar, Tuscaloosa, Bibb, Russell, Choctaw, and Clarke Counties. Drainage areas range from 0.39 to 16.4 square miles Channel slopes range from 9 to 65 feet/mile Channel widths range from 12 to 35 feet

Current Progress All 8 sites have been selected. Geomorphic surveys (pre- construction) completed on 7 out of 8 sites. Event sampling ongoing for sediment and turbidity. Benthic surveys completed (pre-construction).

The Benthic Bunch

Streamflow Turbidity Event driven turbidity sampling (storm events) Site specific – upstream vs. downstream comparison For different flow magnitudes For pre-construction, construction, and post- construction sampling periods.

Oakmulgee