Faisal Mamicpic Alih Urban Environmental Management School of Environment, Resources and Development ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Advertisements

1 Global and Regional Perspectives of Sustainable Transport Development Madan B. Regmi, DEng Transport Division UNESCAP, Bangkok Regional Expert Group.
A Transport Workers’ Perspective on Indigenous Transport and Climate Change Adaptation Alicia Ames School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management.
Ljubljana Urban Region Development Agency meeting with Delegation of Germany - Berlin 31 May 2005 Ljubljana Mr. Miloš Bajt Adviser, City of Ljubljana,
™ Steve Phillips POLIS, October 2006 ERTRAC Priorities for Road Transport Research until 2020 Steve Phillips, FEHRL & ERTRAC Research Area Leader.
Brief Overview of the Passenger Transport Sector in the Philippines Gilberto M. Llanto C.P. ROMULO HALL, NEDA SA MAKATI BUILDING May 7, 2013.
Public Expenditure Analysis May 4, 2007 Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment Your presenters: Annie Gorman Hazel-Ann Petersen.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
Transportation Today Policy, Freight, Intercity Travel Norman W. Garrick Lecture 2 CE 2710.
Transport for Social Responsibility Mainstreaming Gender in Road Transport: Operational Guidance for World Bank Staff An overview Julie BABINARD Environmental.
US East Africa Workshop “Developing Sustainable Transportation Systems” Emerging Issues.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Linking Transport to Employment Creation and Poverty Reduction Professor Ronald McQuaid Employment Research Institute and Transport Research Institute.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
AFD’s strategy of intervention towards Sustainable Urban Transport in China Herve Breton AFD Shanghai Nov.2008.
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
Transport support in foreign economic activity
London Transport Policy, Planning and Strategies Towards clean and sustainable transport By Lucy Hayward-Speight, TfL Principal Policy Advisor.
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo: Research Priorities and Interest in China Lin Gan SINCIERE Member Workshop October 19,
Urban transport and environment in Kathmandu Valley - Local air pollution control and its synergy with global carbon concerns Shobhakar Dhakal, Ph.D. Executive.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
1 POSSIBILITY OF MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN ASIAN COUNTRIES Authors: H. Tan VAN, Kasem CHOOCHARUKUL and Satoshi FUJII* Tokyo Institute of Technology - Department.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
INTEGRATED TRANSPORT CHAINS Transparencies 2003 EU-funded Urban Transport Research Project Results TRANSPORT TEACHING MATERIAL.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
The Palestinian Perspective on the Cooperation in R&D in Sustainable Urban Mobility Khaled Al-Sahili An-Najah National University Palestine Rabat 19 May.
National EST Strategy National EST Strategy Formal Launch May 20, 2011 Discovery Suites, Ortigas Center Metro Manila Highlights Jose Regin F. Regidor Director,
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Seite 1 Energy, Poverty & Gender: Finding the energy to address gender issues Sobiah Becker Pak German Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency.
Mobility energy use for different residential urban patterns in India Anil Kashyap, Jim Berry, Stanley McGreal, School of the Built Environment.
Building the Capacity of Chile’s Transportation Sector for Sustainable Development through the Clean Development Mechanism “LOCATION EFFICIENCY”: A POTENTIAL.
PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY. Evolution over last years about gender equality Prior to 50s: women were defined mainly in terms of their reproductive role.
A Strategic Approach to Climate Change in the Philippines: An Assessment of Low-Carbon Interventions in the Transport and Power Sectors (Study commissioned.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
PARKING STRATEGY POLICY DEVELOPMENT Transportation & Asset Management Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 28 February 2007.
Greening Asia’s Infrastructure Development 1 Herath Gunatilake Director Regional and Sustainable Development Department Asian Development Bank.
DEMOCRITOS DEveloping the MObility CRedits Integrated platform enabling travellers TO improve urban transport Sustainability Grant agreement no
Introduction to Transportation Engineering
Transportation and the CDM: Lessons from Chile John Drexhage, IISD November 29, 2005 Montreal.
Urban Transport: background, problems and challenges
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
Gender & Transport Module Two Gender Integration at the Project Level.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
CAI-Asia is building an air quality management community in Asia Investment Implications of the Action Plan Sustainable Urban.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Livelihood and Mobility Interconnections  Obvious connections:  Travel to work  Transport as work  SLAM mobility considerations  Mobility’s contribution.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY. GAD (Gender and development) In the 80ths, Distinguishes biological differences (that are universal) from the social differences.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Public health and environment 1 |1 | Putting health at the heart of the Green Economy agenda _____ Making the links for Rio+20 Department of Public Health.
Athens, Conference Hall, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, 5&6 November 2015 ALTERNATIVE-COLLECTIVE PATTERNS OF OWNERSHIP AND USE OF.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
Overview of Sustainability Policy Issues CMAP Board of Directors October 10, 2007.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
DANIDA and the UNEP Riso Centre Sustainable Energy for All: Powering Africa 24 th September 2012, Eigtveds Pakhus, Copenhagen Access to sustainable energy.
Gender Equality in Just Transition 1 GENDER EQUALITY.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
Sustainability Statement
The Bangkok Declaration on Physical Activity for Global Health and Sustainable Development
Delivering transport and growth
World population in cities
Transportation Makes a Difference
Monitoring and Evaluation of Sustainable tourism
Transport and Climate Change: Priorities for World Bank-GEF Projects
Transportation Makes a Difference
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF)
Members’ Workshop Wednesday 17th April 2019 Woodhill House Aberdeen
Presentation transcript:

Faisal Mamicpic Alih Urban Environmental Management School of Environment, Resources and Development ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Paratransit services in general – Major source of mobility – Varies in types and sizes depending on the urban setting – Serves as ‘gap-fillers’ – Serves a complementary role in the absence of formal transport Paratransit in the Philippines – Tricycles, motorcycles, jeepneys – Jeepneys serve as major transport mode in middle-sized cities – In some cases they operate alongside buses and other modes – Utilizes modified trucks and manufactured in local shops using second hand engines

Jeepneys cause of congestion and road accidents Jeepneys contribute much to pollution Jeepneys are obsolete Jeepneys are polluters Jeepneys need to be eradicated and changed with modern transport systems However, jeepneys provide vital access and mobility for people especially those who are transport disadvantaged.

The Co-benefit Concept – Formulated because of the pressing environmental problems and the ‘alarming’ rate of climate change – Overlaps climate change and air pollution measures – Measures include bus rapid transit (BRTs) systems, increasing energy efficiency, and switching to cleaner fuels or renewable energy sources.

 Multi-benefits refer to the socio-economic and environmental benefits that paratransit offer/should offer  Multi-benefits provide a deeper understanding of the continued popularity and patronage of paratransit  The emphasis is on the multi-benefits accrued from operations and not on strategies which are otherwise termed co-benefits  Determining multi-benefits allows for more targeted co-benefit strategies of paratransit taking into account its complex socio- economic and environmental considerations.

 What is the service delivery system of the most common paratransit service in Cebu City?  What are the factors that influence the demand for paratransit services?  What are the multi-benefits accrued from the operations of paratransit services?  How are the multi-benefits achieved from the operations of paratransit services?  To understand the service delivery of a quasi-formal jeepney paratransit system  To explain the popularity of the quasi-formal jeepney paratransit system in relation to the socioeconomic conditions of the city  To describe the multi-benefits accrued from paratransit operations  To explore the multi-benefit linkages that are essential in a sustainable and inclusive urban transport system.

 People’s activities  Socioeconomic conditions  Population change  Employment The significant difference in women and men’s travel frequency is may be due to gender disaggregated roles. The insignificant difference may be attributed to the fact that women and men have equal travel opportunities.

 Geographical considerations  Sprawl  Multi-centric character  Distance of places of residence and places of work and activities  Infrastructure conditions  Narrow roads  Poor quality of associated transport infrastructure Source: Cebu City (2008)

 The Route system  The Fare system -Spread over the entire city to connect fringe areas to city center -Designated by LTFRB and city government -A jeepney is only authorized to ply 1 route -Formulated by LTFRB -Directly paid to driver -Cost to the commuter but benefit to driver and their families -Allows drivers’ families to have control of daily income

 Utilized to determine service quality of transport  Service quality is a very important factor of travel demand  Performed based on various socio-economic and environmental attributes of the service  Includes both tangible and intangible multi-benefits  Drawn from people’s perceptions by ranking, among other tools  Major Multi-benefit areas  Environmental quality  Livelihood opportunity  Access provision

 The multi-benefits of emissions and pollution contribution are not achieved in a business-as-usual scenario  A survey by Cebu City Traffic Operations and Management showed that only 18% of jeepneys comply with Clean Air Act emission standards  People do not perceive the benefit of less emissions  The perception on emissions varies negatively with operational speed  Different impacts on women and men as women travel more.

 Jeepney system is more of a small enterprise than employment  Jeepneys are a major source of income for people from the lower income brackets  Adequacy of income is vital for household needs to be addressed  Wives can have more control of household finance with the availability of adequate income

 The major social benefit of the jeepney system  Based on the opportunity to use the system  Women and men are able to carry out their respective tasks and further access opportunities, goods and services anywhere in the city  In spite of the insignificant differences, more women positively perceive the benefit than men because of their frequent utilization of jeepneys

 Multi-benefits  Operates in a wide service area  Available anywhere  Convenient transfers  Available anytime  Provides direct service to destination  Standardized low fare  Protection from the elements  Provides livelihood  Attributes that have potential multi-benefits  There is no feeling of safety  Poor physical quality makes the ride not comfortable  Does not reliably provide discounts to entitled commuters  Does not regularly operate on a 24-hour basis  Polluting

 Identifying multi-benefits provides a holistic picture of a wide range of benefits that have been oftentimes overlooked and that which should have been targets of policy measures.  A gender perspective in multi-benefit study allows for deeper understanding of how women and men perceive the attributes of service quality based on gender responsibilities.  Allows for Co-benefit strategies to target environmental quality, livelihood and access in order to achieve a holistic set of benefits  Creates avenues for gradual change that would increase jeepney multi-benefits through redesign and reengineering based on efficiency and anthropometrics.  Transport policy and strategies should be geared towards increasing public transport utilization and promoting universal access and inclusiveness.

 Study the jeepney with respect to other modes of transport such as walking and related infrastructure in order to get a holistic picture of the entire public transport system and its multi- benefits.  Conduct more studies on social inclusion and determine how the jeepneys are barriers to and potential vehicles for social inclusion.  Given the multi-benefits on a range of socioeconomic and energy-environment dimensions, studies should be performed on how they could be linked to co-benefit strategies and on how the latter should be formulated in order to achieve the former.  How the benefit of access as provided by jeepneys has able to increase people’s incomes through the access to employment and other goods and services.

It is not a crazy idea of studying the possibility and feasibility of a Jeepney Rapid Transit system patterned after the Bus Rapid Transit system but one which is able to serve areas where the bus is not able to cover. THANK YOU SO MUCH