September 07 Airborne Experiment. September 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aviation Use of Radar WP8B/8D Radar Seminar September 2005.
Advertisements

Air Traffic Management
TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING (TLS): APPLICATIONS TO ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE HERITAGE PRESERVATION – PART 1.
Antarctic Ice Shelf 3D Cross-sectional Imaging using MIMO Radar A. Hari Narayanan UCL Electronic and Electrical Engineering, UK P. Brennan UCL Electronic.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology The NASA/JPL Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar System (AIRSAR) Yunling Lou Jet Propulsion.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Space experiment on the International Space Station with P-band SAR Space experiment on the International Space Station with P-band SAR B.Kutuza, A.Kalinkevitch,
Sky Hunter Exploration. Sky Hunter Exploration is a Calgary, Canada-based company that provides a valuable exploration tool to oil and.
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
BIIR Cost Preview Preparatory Materials. BIIR Can Help Answer These Science Questions Refined science questions derived in part from the St. Petersburg.
Ventures Proposal Science Objectives and Requirements.
Global Ice Sheet Mapping Observatory (GISMO) Ohio State Univ., JPL, Univ. Kansas, VEXCEL Corp., E.G&G Corp., Wallops Flight Facility.
SAR (Synthetic Aperture RADAR) : a high resolution 2-D ground mapping technique.
Tuning in to UHE Neutrinos in Antarctica – The ANITA Experiment J. T. Link P. Miočinović Univ. of Hawaii – Manoa Neutrino 2004, Paris, France ANITA-LITE.
Surface Based Sounding SAR Update May 3, PRISM SAR Radar system installed on Tucker Sno-Cat at Summit, Greenland.
SeaSonde Overview.
IPY Satellite Data Legacy Vision: Use the full international constellation of remote sensing satellites to acquire spaceborne ‘snapshots’ of processes.
GPS Accuracy Testing Using: “RTK” (Real Time Kinematic) & “One Step Transformations” (Site Calibrations)
Interferometric Sounder Concept for Ice Sheet Mapping Review, Simulations, Spaceborne System, Future E. Rodriguez Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Characterizing the Existing Network Designing and Supporting Computer Networks.
Electromagnetic Methods (EM) Measurement of varying electromagnetic fields Induced by transmitter antennas, recorded by receiver antennas Alternative measurement.
Company Confidential GISMO Radar Review GISMO Processor and Results August 7, 2007.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
1 of 22 Glaciers and Ice Sheets Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
GISMO Team Meeting JPL January 31, February 1, 2007.
GISMO Airborne Experiment Planning Proposed Greenland 2006 Campaign WFF Meeting Feb GISMO Team K.Jezek, E. Rodriguez, P. Gogineni, J. Curlander,
Some Recent Developments in Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets Kenneth Jezek The Ohio State University.
Airborne RLAN and Weather Radar Interference Studies at C Band Paul Joe 1, Frank Whetten 2, John Scott 1 and Dennis Whetten 2 1 Environment Canada 2 The.
Glaciers and Ice Sheet Interferometric Radar April 2007 Planning Meeting Wallops Flight Facility October 10, 2006.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
Excerpts from Tom Jackson’s slides shown at Nov 2013 SMAP CalVal workshop with comments added by E. Kim in green TJJ–1 Green comments added by E.Kim.
ITW2008: P. Campus, R. Oldfield Bermuda, 3-7 November 2008 The recently installed IMS Infrasound Station IS51, Bermuda Paola Campus Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban.
Synthetic Aperture Radar Specular or Bragg Scatter? OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001.
Using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2.
InSAR and LIDAR Lecture 8 Oct 13, 2004.
An Overview of Glaciers and Icesheets Mapping Orbiter (GISMO) & Global Ice Sheet Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Ohio State University University of Kansas.
GISMO Review Summary June 11, Key Results Left-right filtering works. Doubles the swath width Ray bending broadens azimuth point target response.
Forward Observer In-Flight Dual Copy System Richard Knepper, Matthew Standish NASA Operation Ice Bridge Field Support Research Technologies Indiana University.
University of Kansas S. Gogineni, P. Kanagaratnam, R. Parthasarathy, V. Ramasami & D. Braaten The University of Kansas Wideband Radars for Mapping of Near.
Scott Hensley, Howard Zebker, Cathleen Jones, Paul Lundgren, Eric Fielding, Thierry Michel and Bruce Chapman.
ASIRAS Pre Report ● Part 1: ASIRAS campaigns 2004 ● System characteristics ● Data acquisition ● Part2: preliminary data processing report ● GPS processing.
System Calibration Fernando Rodriguez-Morales August 7 th, 2007.
GISMO Simulation Status Objective Radar and geometry parameters Airborne platform upgrade Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling.
Technical University of Denmark Radars and modifications IIP KU Team.
Technical University of Denmark Radar Deployment and Results IIP Team.
May 2006 Navigation John Sonntag EG&G Technical Services, Inc. 10 October 2006.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
InSAR Application for mapping Ice Sheets Akhilesh Mishra Dec 04, 2015.
Company Confidential GISMO Processor Review June 28, 2007.
GISMO Navigation John Sonntag EG&G Technical Services, Inc. 31 January 2007.
Proposed Flight Lines (note that these were amended subsequent to the meeting)
Proposed Flight Lines. April 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable 6, 6 hour flights.
GISMO Team Meeting May 3, 2006 Vexcel Corporation.
Active Remote Sensing for Elevation Mapping
GISMO Flights Plans and Objectives. Technical Objectives for April ’07 Experiment 1) Acquire data over the May 2006 flight line to compare high.
Fault Plane Solution Focal Mechanism.
A Concept for Spaceborne Imaging of the Base of Terrestrial Ice Sheets and Icy Bodies in the Solar System Ken Jezek, Byrd Polar Research Center E. Rodriguez,
EEE381B Pulsed radar A pulsed radar is characterized by a high power transmitter that generates an endless sequence of pulses. The rate at which the pulses.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Camp Sentinel II Radar System [4] -Installed outside US Army Camp in Vietnam in Antenna Dimensions: 3.5 m diameter x 1 m tall antenna. -2 kW.
Congratulations! You have chosen to climb Mount
Garmin GX55 Visual Search Patterns National Emergency Services Academy Mission Aircrew School (June 2012 Rev D)
Detection of Areas of Basal Melt from RES Data
INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM
Visit for more Learning Resources
January 07 Action items Documentation on the refence locations onboard the aircraft including navigation system center Table of Calibration parameters.
Interferogram Filtering vs Interferogram Subtraction
Remote sensing in meteorology
Proposed Flight Lines.
Presentation transcript:

September 07 Airborne Experiment

September 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable Experiment Plan Posted at – state.edu/rsl/gismo/documents/GISMO_07.pdf

Technical Objectives for September ’07 Experiment 1) Acquire data over the May 2006 flight line to compare high and low altitude observations and to compare interferometry acquired with different baselines. Are results consistent with theory? 2) Acquire data at 150 MHz and 450 MHz along every flight line and compare backscatter and interferometric frequency response? Are the results consistent with theory? 3) Acquire data over areas where we expect to find subglacial water. Is water detectable either from backscatter maps or from topography? 4) Acquire data over regions of increasing surface roughness. This may require observations over heavily crevassed shear margins such as those found around Jacobshavn Glacier. Can we successfully implement interferogram phase filtering? 5) Acquire data for tomographic analysis 6) Investigate repeat pass interferometry over repeat periods of days. 7) Verify volume clutter is weak (all snow zones) 8) Collect data over thick and thin ice to test for absorption effects

Update to May 06 Experiment Plan ParameterValue Frequency150 Mhz, 450 MHz Band width20 MHz, 40 MHz Range window Start 4 us to 44 us with pulse 1 (lo-gain) Then 15 us to 55 us pulse 2 (hi-gain) Pulse width3 us PRF10 KHz (5 Khz for each pulse) Baseline offsetReturn flight 25 m south of outbound flight CalibrationRough ocean observations at these specs Aircraft elevation above ellipsoid (geoid)~ ft (install additional external attunuators into the receiver Antennas configured for two frequenciesRedesigned At least one flight with multiple repeats for tomography Racetrack design High elevation flights on any flights of opportunity26,000 ft Early evaluation of Greenland dataVECO assisted DVD or electronic file transfer to KU after first GISMO flight: Process to depth sounder mode; Process to SAR image

Constraints on Flight Operations Fly at maximum allowable altitude Limit flight duration to allow for daily data Q/A and experiment modifications (about 6 hours assuming 150 Gb/hour and 3, 300 Gb disks) Allow enough field time to repeat flight lines Fly over high and low clutter areas Fly over areas where some information on basal properties is known VHF and UHF radars cannot operate simultaneously – repeat P-band and VHF along same track to within 30 m Schedule 2 to 4 repeat flights at 30 m horizontal offsets for tomography

Planned Flight Lines

Proposed Flight Lines 1.Ice Streams 2.Outlet Glaciers 3.Jacobshavn 4.OSU Clusters

Jacobshavn 1.Open Ocean Segment down Sondrestrom Fjord 2.Several passes over Jacobshavn glacier with tomography racetrack 3.Flight over GRIP GISP drill sites 4.Outbound at ft, Return flight at 500 feet 5.Flights at 150 MHz and 450 MHz

Thule 2 Flight of NEMES drilling site location Flights across crevassed areas of outlet glaciers and across grounding lines Tomography racetrack over Mt. Gogineni Segment over open ocean Flight at 150 and 450 MHz

Thule Flight 1 Flight 1 –Segment over open ocean –Repeat segment flown at 150 MHz in May 2006 –Flights at 150 and 450 MHz –Overflight of NGRIP and North East Ice Stream

Clusters Measurements where 2-dimensional surveys have been conducted: –OSU Clusters –Dye 3 Measurements over East Greenland outlet glaciers

Range Window Duration (Clusters) 1500’ elevation over ice sheet26000’ Presssure Altitude

Range Window Duration (26000’ Pressure Altitude)

Flight Hour Summary Flight line total time (hours)data collection time (hours) Thule Thule Sonde Clusters flights per line

August 07 Test Flights and Transit

Test Flights Plan one test flight with at least one contingency flight Data collection to be beyond 200 mile limit Data collection portion of flight to last 2 hours Antennas configured at 450 MHz (operate radar at 450 and 150 by utilizing harmonic)

Test Flight Objectives Verify that the radar system reliably transmits/receives/records data at 450 and 150 MHz. Verify and practice operational procedures including procedures for turning on and turning off the radar in concert with aircraft crew manipulation of aircraft power.

Test Flight Approach Conduct 1, 2 hour data collection test flight (allow for one contingency flight) Record ocean waveforms and verify consistent, uninterrupted data acquitision. Verify chirp shape and duration. Verify loop sensitivity Verify system bandwidth Verify presum rates Verify GPS data stream link Conduct two +-60 degree rolls to acquire antenna pattern data. Transfer test data to KCJ disk and process data. Label all cables. Calibration Tests????? Test contingency plans (several options in case of a primary radar failure?).

Test Flight Success Criteria Radar transmits receives and records uninterrupted data over the designed bandwidths at 150 and 450 MHz. Data are downloadable and processable. Tools necessary for calibration (eg load terminators) are available. Procedure pages are available for the operator and vetted

Go/No Go Decisions for Discussion What do we do if we observe intermittent or more serious failures? What do we do if there is another catastrophic failure? Do we address problems in the plane? Do we immediately dismantle and put the radar box on a bench at WFF (adequate room to easily pull radar box)? Do we ship back to Lawrence?

Transit Transit to Thule with 450 MHz antennas Do first Thule flight for GISMO to secure some data early Interleave remaining flights with ATM/MCARD on subsequent flights noting that it would be useful to complete 450 MHz flights before changing to 150 MHz antennas Transit to Sonde at 150 MHz Complete ATM/MCARD and 150 MHz GISMO flights Complete 450 MHz GISMO flights Return transit at 450 MHz for additional calibration work