IRIS: Iowa Rivers Information System Provide a consistent base layer for locational accuracy Document the health of Iowa’s riverine environments through.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Advertisements

Caddo Lake/Upper West Gulf Coastal Plain NFWF Project Ryan Smith Steve Gilbert Jesse Valdez The Nature Conservancy.
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Updating the National Hydrography Data for the Twin Cities with Local Subsurface Drainage Information NHD Stewardship Conference Lakewood, Colorado April.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment University of.
Development of Aquatic Ecosystem Models Lizhu Wang, Shaw Lacy, Paul Seebach, Mike Wiley Institute for Fisheries Research MDNR and U of M.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship in West Virginia George Heleine USGS NHD POC Region.
Applications of GIS to River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment.
Aquatic Gap Analysis and Biodiversity Management The AGAP Team: Kevin Kane, Co-PI AIT GIS Facility, ISU, Clay Pierce, Co-PI Dept. Natural.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
The Great Lakes Aquatic Gap Analysis Project Overview Jana Stewart U.S. Geological Survey.
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
SPRNCA: Maintaining Riparian/Wetland Function. What does that mean today? Isn’t SPRNCA already “protected and enhanced?” When will it be “good enough”?
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Geographic Information Systems Other Digital Data.
Extending the National Hydrography Dataset: A Spatial Framework for Water Resources Applications in West Virginia Jackie Strager Natural Resource Analysis.
Geospatial Organization and Access to Springs Survey Data in Kaibab National Forest Jeri Ledbetter, MGIS Candidate Douglas Miller, Graduate Advisor July.
An Introduction to the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer (NHDE) Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner NC Natural Heritage Program North Carolina.
DNR Data for Comprehensive Planning Shannon Fenner, DNR Statewide Land Use Team Leader.
Using a GIS to Develop a Binational, Multi-discipline Decision Support System for The Huron Basin Mark MacKay Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources.
Benjamin Blandford, PhD University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center Michael Shouse, PhD University of Southern Illinois.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
North Coast Explorer: A Natural Resources Digital Library Renee Davis-Born and Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources Oregon State University Oregon.
By Pete Steeves Alabama StreamStats Presented at the Alabama Water Resources Conference Perdido Beach Resort, Orange Beach, Alabama September 8, 2011 U.S.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
12/04/07FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing for the FGDC Coordination Group December.
IOWA GAP ANALYSIS PROGRAM Northern Leopard Frog animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu American Goldfinch Map the land cover of.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
Riparian Proper Functioning Condition A process for assessment A defined condition A starting point A common language An interdisciplinary team approach.
Indiana National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Improvement and Application Workshop NHD Local-Resolution Development.
NFHP Assessment Update Gary E. Whelan and Andrea C. Ostroff NFHP Science and Data Committee Co-Chairs November 2014.
CENSUS OF MARINE LIFE All Program Meeting Mapping & Visualization Pat Halpin November 2007 Auckland, New Zealand.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Linking Data to the NHD Supporting Informed Water Resources Decision Making 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The National Map Digital Mapping Techniques Workshop Columbus, Ohio June 12, 2006 Charles Hickman.
Role of Spatial Database in Biodiversity Conservation Planning Sham Davande, GIS Expert Arid Communities Technologies, Bhuj 11 September, 2015.
N atural R esource I nformation S ystems. ObjectivesObjectives  NRIS Water Overview  Spatial Data in NRIS Water  Integration of NHD data.
Reached Indexing Using the NHD Hydrologic Event Management (HEM) Tool IDEM – Joanna Wood.
Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.
Local Resolution NHD Photo-Based Revision for West Virginia Jackie Strager Kurt Donaldson Kevin Kuhn April 24, 2007 Denver, CO West Virginia GIS Technical.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Gary Darling - GISP Office of the State CIO Acting Deputy Geographic Information Officer Melody Baldwin Division of Flood Management JOC –FOC GIS Unit.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
Aquatic GAP program in Kansas Keith Gido, Walter Dodds, Chris Guy, Jessica Kemp, and Bob Oakes Kansas State University The Gap Analysis Program
Nehalem River Basin: Technical Assistance for Watershed Data Synthesis, Restoration, and Outreach Priorities 4/16/2008.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
Minnesota Hydrography Land of 10,000 Lakes (or so) Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Project
Integrated Data Management.
Drinking Water Mapping Application
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Decision support for watershed assessment, protection and restoration
Presentation transcript:

IRIS: Iowa Rivers Information System Provide a consistent base layer for locational accuracy Document the health of Iowa’s riverine environments through data coordination Track biodiversity locally within a global perspective Helping to direct management, protection, restoration, and educational efforts within Iowa’s river resources Prioritizing conservation efforts Easy accessibility to all information Consistent Hydrologic Base Layer Attribute Database Coordination IRIS Goals Tracking Biodiversity & Prioritizing Conservation Efforts When first envisioning how we were going to get the IRIS database into the hands of users, we thought using the Illinois Stream Information System (ISIS - above) method Accessibility of Information The IRIS Team: Kevin Kane, IRIS Coordinator, Co-PI ISU GIS Facility, ISU, Clay Pierce, Co-PI Dept. Animal Ecology, ISU, Robin McNeely, IRIS Attribution, IRIS Base Layer Dept. Animal Ecology, ISU, Patrick Brown, IRIS User Interface, IRIS Base Layer ISU GIS Facility, ISU, Aquatic Habitat Biologist Dept. Animal Ecology, ISU Please visit the following webpages for more information about Aquatic Gap Analysis: IRIS and Aquatic GAP - mombasa.gis.iastate.edu/iris/iris.htm Iowa Gap Analysis - National Gap Analysis - Final Products / Credits: The Iowa Aquatic Gap Analysis Program will publish a final report explaining the biodiversity status of breeding aquatic species in the state. In conjunction with this biodiversity analysis, an atlas of land cover and the rivers database will also be published. The documents will be available on CD and on the Iowa Aquatic GAP website in Adobe Acrobat.pdf format. The GIS datasets used to create the land cover, stewardship and aquatic species layers will be available for downloading via ftp service. This same GIS data will be available for interactive viewing and querying over the Internet using ESRI’s Internet Map Server software. Credits: Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership National Gap Analysis Program Illinois Stream Information System Iowa Dept. of Natural Resources Iowa State University IRIS Overview Using National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Two phases of development: Phase I – Reach based inventory Phase II – Dynamic Segmentation model Linkages by reach to other attribute databases Phase I Reach Based Percent Cropland By Reach Phase II Dynamic Segmentation Begin Reach End Reach Begin Sample End Sample Ecoregions Landcover Watersheds Rivers Land Stewardship Iowa Rivers Information System (IRIS) focuses on the need for a comprehensive database relating physical, chemical, and biological information on a broad spatial scale to in-stream habitat and fishery resources in interior Iowa rivers. The approach is to develop a geographic information system (GIS) focusing on Iowa rivers incorporating geology, land cover and use, watershed, channel morphology, hydrology, water quality, biological information, etc. Numerous existing databases available from a variety of sources and in a variety of formats will be incorporated. These existing databases will be integrated into a common GIS format tailored specifically for exploring data relationships with specific points along rivers. The resulting Iowa Rivers Information System enables quantitative analysis of a tremendous amount of information covering a broad spatial scale, facilitate visualization of relationships using the graphic flexibility of the GIS approach, and provide the framework to continuously add new information as it becomes available from data providers and fieldwork. IRIS will first be used to explore differences in physical and chemical characteristics associated with Iowa rivers and among sites within rivers. The Nature Conservancy’s Aquatic Classification System will be used for this classification. This analysis will provide quantitative as well as graphic comparisons among rivers, ecoregions, The Need for IRIS and Iowa Aquatic GAP and large drainage units and will help focus potential research and management efforts. For example, rivers will be characterized by variables such as sinuosity, gradient, watershed area, percent of watershed by land cover and use, wooded riparian zone, discharge variability, average nitrate concentration, etc. Sites for detailed study of in- stream habitat and fish populations will then be chosen to represent the broad ranges of these variables. Results of previous studies in the literature will provide a basis for predicting relationships between these variables and in- stream habitat and fish populations, providing a valuable interim management tool before detailed studies in Iowa rivers are completed. IRIS is designed to accommodate data from detailed field studies in Iowa rivers as they become available. Inclusion of these data will permit direct evaluation of relationships between database variables and in-stream habitat and fishery resources in Iowa rivers as well as building a standard database of Iowa river data. IRIS will be an exceptionally powerful tool for directing management, protection, restoration, and educational efforts with Iowa rivers. Questions as broad in scope as, “Does percent in-stream cover vary between ecoregions?”, or as narrow as, “Does percent in-stream cover vary with sinuosity?” can be answered in both quantitative and graphic formats. Example Species Habitat Affinity Database (MO) Watershed / Stream Bio-prediction General Approach Step 1. Classify Iowa’s riverine resources into distinct valley segment types Step 2. Assess the relative conservation status of each valley segment type and develop initial conservation priorities (quality and quantity) Step 3. Predict the biological potential of each valley segment Step 4. Revise initial conservation priorities using biological information Step 5. Identify valley segments which are both biologically significant and of relatively high quality NHD Developing a Digital Data Layer of Valley Segment Types  Purpose l Delineate distinct stream environments l Evolutionary and Ecologically Meaningful Units (See EDUs below) l Serve as the habitat template for predicting biological potential  Protocol l The Nature Conservancy’s Aquatic Community Classification Framework l Based on Ecoregions and Watersheds aka EcoDrainage Units (EDUs) * Ecoregion: Des Moines Lobe * Basin: Des Moines * River Size: Medium * Structure: Unconfined valley * Flow: Perennial * Temperature: Warm * Gradient: Moderate * Substrate: Fine * Hydrograph: Stable Example of Distinct Valley Segment Type IRIS and Aquatic GAP Predictive Modeling Habitat Affinity Databse Historic and Sampled Distributions Predictive Model Watershed Influence to Habitat Classifying Rivers Habitat Affinity Database Statewide Known Distributions by Hydrologic Unit Valley Segment Data layer Predicting the Biological Potential of each Valley Segment Build a consistent hydrologic base layer (the spatial database) for IRIS (and Aquatic GAP) in cooperation with the Iowa DNR's GIS Section using the National Hydrographic Dataset (NHD) including: coding stream IDs, watersheds, stream names, stream length, stream route and order, and boundaries, counties, TRS (public land survey), USGS quads, etc. for every reach in the state. When the idea of creating a statewide stream database for Iowa was first being discussed there were several existing models we were able to look at for guidance. One of theses, the Illinois Stream Information System (ISIS), was extremely useful for us because of the similarities between our river systems and our familiarity with the ISIS staff. For this reason, the first set of attributes per reach on our wish list were those that were collected for ISIS. Attributes needed to complete Iowa’s Aquatic Gap Analysis were also added to our collection list. These two sets of attribute variables were then compared to what had already been collected for IRIS. Those comparison tables are shown to the left. The official start of the IRIS project has allowed us to begin the process of attributing the new NHD reach coverages (see below). IRIS interface showing attributes as themes Comparison of ISIS, IRIS and Aquatic Gap Attributes These two figures show examples of the initial IRIS attributions that will be completed for all Iowa watersheds by stream reach (attributes from the table circled in red above). On the left, each of the NHD reaches has been assigned a stream order by spatial conflation with the DNR’s stream order coverage. On the right, each reach is evaluated by the percent of deciduous forest within 90m of the reach. IRIS will use the completed Iowa GAP landcover map for this type of analysis for all landcover types. Percent Cropland By Reach of dissemination through a CD product was the way to go. As time has gone by and map serving via the internet has matured, we are now proposing to provide IRIS users with on-line, real time access through an ArcIMS Server (see figure left below). Access via the internet map server will allow users to have the latest versions of the data without relying on updates to CDs plus the ability to analyze the data using GIS tools without having to purchase costly software. Predefined queries such as those show below will help novice users gather information from the data to make timely management decisions. IRIS ArcIMS interface showing river attributes ( IRIS application showing percent cropland per reach and inset with orthophoto and GAP landcover Kevin Kane, ISU GIS Facility, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa IRIS Cooperators: