Sneak Preview: Sneak Preview: The New US Geospatial Metadata Standard GeoMaxim Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Lynda Wayne, GISP Sharon Shin

The US is in the final stages of adopting a national geospatial metadata standard. While the FGDC geospatial metadata standard was a federal standard recognized by most state and local governments, the forthcoming standard will be an American National Standards Institute (ANSI) implementation of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Geographic Information - Metadata (standard). This new standard, while based heavily on the FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) version 2.0, introduces new formats and content that incorporate more robust data structures, e.g. flexibility, while at the same time addressing the need for increased standardization in individual element values, e.g. domains. Get a sneak preview of these new features as well as the draft guidance workbook under development by the FGDC.

North American Profile (NAP) Status US is in the final is in the final stages of adopting a national geographic metadata standard –Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata aka ‘FGDC’ metadata standard is a federal standard –NAP is an American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard with broader applicability –ANSI approval is expected in early 2009 we are here start finish scale determined by ISO, ANSI, INCITS L1 and various other acronyms

Transition to the NAP –transition will be staged as it as with the FGDC standard apply to new metadata records translate existing metadata records –FGDC is working with NSGIC, URISA and others to develop effective transition strategies –translation applications under development by FGDC, Intergraph, ESRI and several international metadata application developers

New or Robust Sections - Resource Maintenance added functionality - Data Quality increased structure

What’s New with the NAP? New Elements International elements Data / Metadata Language Technical elements Character Set Encoding Extended elements CSDGM = geographic and temporal extent NAP = geographic, temporal, & Vertical Extent Needed elements Topic Category – 19 standardized subject categories to facilitate data discovery

What’s New with the NAP? Conditionality Fewer mandatory elements Core contains only 7 mandatory elements Dataset Title Dataset Reference Date Dataset Language Dataset Topic Category Abstract Metadata Point of Contact Metadata Date Stamp...includes far more optional elements

What’s New with the NAP? Domains More standardized domains and code lists in place of free text to control vocabulary and improve discovery Contact Role = author, distributor, custodian, point of contact… Topic Category = transportation, environment, elevation, biota…. Online Function = download, information, offline access… Keyword Type = theme, place, stratum, temporal… Maintenance Frequency = continual, daily, weekly, annually… Progress = completed, archived, obsolete, ongoing, planned… Topic Category = transportation, environment, oceans, biota…

What’s New with the NAP? Content Includes elements to document geospatial services Web Mapping Services Geospatial Data Catalogues and Portals Other Does not CURRENTLY include Entity & Attribute documentation documented by ISO 19110: Feature Catalog NAP team intends to extend NAP to include Feature Catalog in next version

What’s New with the NAP? Multilevel Metadata Metadata can be created for: Data Series - wetlands Dataset - Paducah wetlands Feature Type - marsh Feature Instance - Mandy’s Marsh Attribute Type - salinity Attribute Instance - actual % water salinity

Implementation Resources Under Development 1. Transition Guidance –what’s different and why –transition strategies –incorporating entities/attributes –best practices –transitional FAQ –other? item

Implementation Resources Under Development 2. Graphical Representation –update to “Stitt” diagrams –hyperlinked and printable –other? item

Implementation Resources Under Development 3. Workbook/Reference Document –based on CSDGM Workbook 2.0 –background (w/transition guidance) –components –conditionality –section by section review definitions best practices examples FAQs –other? item

Staying Current 1.Join the FGDC Metadata Working Group –quarterly telecons to discuss federal and stakeholder metadata activities and issues –regular calls for review/input –regular calls for task/committee participation Send to Sharon include: –name –organization –‘please add my to the Metadata Working Group’

Staying Current 2.Participate in Resource Materials Reviews –transition guidance and strategies –graphical representation –workbook/reference doc –other Send to Lynda include: –name –‘I am interested in contributing to the (resource) development and review’

Staying Current 3.Join the international Metadata Listserver –issue and implementation oriented discussions –low traffic Go to:

Questions? Lynda Wayne Sharon Shin