ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Advertisements

California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
IUSD English Learner Program October, The English Learner Master Plan is….. A companion piece to the Strategic Plan A description of the procedures,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Cathy George Academic Accountability.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education AMAO Calculations for /10/2015Oregon Department of Education1.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education Office of Education Equity – Title III.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA Off-the-Record Meeting Thursday, September 26th, 2014.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives. Thompson School District Core Values Integrity –We will consistently demonstrate respect, honesty, transparency,
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Workgroup 1: College and Career Readiness Outcomes State Outcomes Subgroup COSA Winter Conference 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
OAASFEP Report Card Update Marianne Mottley – October 13, 2015.
1 Student Longitudinal Growth Project Jonathan Wiens Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens and Sara Berscheit Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education AMAO Calculations for /9/2016Oregon Department of Education1.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
ELL Program Advisory Group December 1, TWO PHASES of WORK ELL Program Advisory Group PHASE ONE 1/1/2016As Specified in HB Criteria Determine.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
E L P A. ELPA Understand the definition and purpose of the English Language Proficiency Assessment Administer ELPA appropriately Objectives.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Target Practice with AMAOs 1, 2, 3. AMAOs 1,2,3 District level targets for EL under Title III Accountability They show how all of the EL in a cohort are.
Accountability Training Review Agenda for Today: Review of calculation changes and what’s new In depth review of Closing Gaps calculations Graduation Rates.
2016 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
WIDA Standards for ELLs
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
English Learner Accountability Component
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015

Data Sources The following data sources were used to create this presentation school year data is the most recent data available at this time AMAO report Graduation cohort report – media file AMAO manual

Acronyms used in this presentation AMAO – Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives The accountability report on progress of ELs enrolled in districts. EL – English learner (aka ELL, LEP) A student who comes from a family with a home language other than English and has qualified to receive support in acquiring English based on an approved identification assessment. ELSWD – English learner student with a disability an English learner who has an IEP.

Additional terminology used in this presentation Limited English Proficient – name for current English learners and monitored ELs included in accountability reports. Included in graduation calculation as any student who was an EL at any time in grades Ever ELs – name for current English learners, monitored ELs and students who had been identified as an English learner since the school year. Never ELs – name for students who have not been identified as an English learner since the school year.

Additional terminology used in this presentation Current EL – students who have not exited an ELD program. Monitored EL – students who exited the ELD program in or Former EL – Students who exited the ELD program prior to

Additional terminology used in this presentation Cohort – a group of students who began high school(grade 9) the same school year. Graduate – a student who has completed high school earning a diploma (includes modified diploma) Completer – a student who has earned an Adult HS diploma, extended diploma, or a GED

AMAO 1 Data Oregon’s AMAO 1 calculation is a growth model based on a trajectory that all ELs will progress in learning English within 6 years, based on a beginning level of 1. Students meeting their individual growth target are included in the AMAO 1 numerator. Growth targets are established based on an academic peer’s progress on ELPA.

AMAO 2 Oregon’s AMAO 2 calculation is a two-part calculation. English learners are divided based on the number of years the student has been identified as an English learner. Districts must meet both AMAO 2A and 2B to have an overall Meet for AMAO 2. Students included in AMAO 2A have been identified as an English learner fewer than 5 years. Students included in AMAO 2B have been identified as an English learner 5 or more years. All students are included in their respective AMAO 2 denominator Students who are exited as proficient speakers of English are included in their respective AMAO 2 numerator.

AMAO 3 AMAO 3 is Oregon’s AMO growth model for the LEP (English learner and ELs on monitor status) subgroup. AMAO 3 includes: growth on reading and math and graduation rates. Over 70% of English learners are enrolled in grades K-5 thus some districts do not have an EL graduation rate. ODE has weighted AMAO determinations to address the difference between districts.

16 Districts meeting AMAO 3 Rated on Growth and Grad Rate – 8 Districts Must be 65% weighted percentage or higher Average number of ELs enrolled 1115 Range of EL district enrollment Districts meeting AMAO 3 also had an AMAO overall of MET Average number of ELs enrolled 1254 Range of ELs enrolled Rated only on Growth – 8 districts Must be 70% weighted percentage or higher Average number of ELs enrolled 213 Range of EL district enrolled Districts meeting AMAO 3 also had an AMAO overall of MET Average number of ELs enrolled 298 Range of ELs enrolled

Number of districts meeting more than one AMAO target AMAO 1 – growth in learning English & AMAO 2 – obtaining English proficiency. AMAO 1 – growth in learning English & AMAO 3 (AMO for the LEP subgroup). AMAO 2 - obtaining English proficiency and AMAO 3 (AMO for the LEP subgroup).

EL Graduation and Completer Rates

For Additional Information ODE AMAO web page ODE graduation rate