Practice Education Facilitators. Quality Standards for Practice Placements (NES 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Advertisements

Community Hospital Review – The Clinical Model What did we recommend? Dr. David Carson, Director, The Primary Care Foundation.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Clinical Placement Review Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust Benchmarking Exercise May 2002 Adele Kane.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Why does the WDC support learning in practice through the Placement Learning Unit?
Formative Assessment and Work- based Learning Claire Thurgate Programme Director – Foundation Degrees Work-related learning co-ordinator.
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
Evaluation and Human Resources Focus: discuss how evaluation of schools is conducted and where the emphasis should be placed in these evaluations. Thesis:
Professional Skills Development
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Celebrating 10 years of Practice Education Facilitation in Scotland Dr Colette Ferguson Director of Nursing,
Assistant Practitioners: the journey through education Sue Cluroe The University of Northampton.
CHANGES TO THE LEVEL 4 CERTIFICATE
Mentor Workshop: Assessing Learners Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
What do nurses want systems to do for them? Theresa Fyffe Director Royal College of Nursing, Scotland.
The NHS KSF Learning Programme Days One & Two [Sessions 1- 6] The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework.
Mentorship Preparation Programme Week 6 Clinical Assessment processes Queen’s University Belfast Open University University of Ulster.
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
Developing a Team Approach to Workplace Learning.
Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs.
Lead Practitioner Leadership Training ‘Sharing The Vision’ Wednesday 4 th September 2013.
Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.
Rosie Lusznat/ Richard Weaver 11 January 2013 GMC Recognising and approving trainers.
Neades, B.L., Lawson, B., Watson, W. (2014) Evaluating the Impact of the NMC (2008) Approved Preparation Programme for Mentors within the Lothian and Borders.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Nursing and Midwifery Pre-registration Management Review Survey feedback.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Early Clinical Career Fellowships Supporting Fellows: The role of the Mentor and Board Lead Jane Ormerod – Head of Professional and Practice Development.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
Developing a standardised introductory course for HCA’s in General Practice - lessons learnt and future directions.
Mentorship Practice Education Facilitators June 2005.
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD SUPPORTING PRE-SERVICE TRAINEES ON PLACEMENT Pre-service Mentor Training 2011.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Mentor Workshop: Supporting and Managing the Underachieving Students Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER. Overview Sharing information.
NMC Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice Lesley Barrowman Senior Professional Officer NIPEC.
Paramedic Science Mentor update. Practice Assessment Team Current Teaching and Assessing Qualifications Assessment Taxonomy Assessment Documents Assessment.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development NHS Education for Scotland (NES) A Good Place to Live – A Good Place to Die Liz Travers, Educational Project.
The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework
Supporting Development of Organisational Knowledge Management Strategy NHS Librarians Meeting 3 rd June 2010.
CPD- Continuous Professional Development & GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL STAFF.
The context for the revised guidance Alan Inglis Assistant Principal, John Wheatley College.
Practice Education Facilitators NHS FIFE. GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE Caring for Scotland (2001) Facing The Future (2001) Highlighted areas of concerns The.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.
PHE Local Intelligence Contribution David Meechan, Director for Knowledge & Intelligence (East Midlands), Public Health England.
SAN FRANCISCO’S FAMILY AND CHILDREN’S SERVICES BUILDING A COMPETENCY BASED ORGANIZATION.
Joint HEI Mentor Update Supporting Learning and Assessment in Practice Edge Hill University Liverpool John Moores University University of Liverpool.
Quality Standards for Supported Employment Wednesday 09 November 2005 NIUSE Facilitators:- Teresa Hazzard & Heather Logan.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR SENIOR AHPs SUSAN SHANDLEY EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS MANAGER, AHP CAREERS.
Personal Leadership Serving Customers Managing Resources Leadership Serving Customers Serving Customers Managing Resources Managing Resources Working for.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Personal Leadership Personal Leadership Serving Customers Serving Customers Managing Resources Managing Resources Leadership Serving Customers Serving.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Collaborative Learning
European Association of Neuroscience Nurses (EANN)
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Coaching.
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
SLE Information.
Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA)
SLE Information.
February 21-22, 2018.
CORE MENTOR UPDATE 2019 January This is the final version of the core update completed by the Midlands, Yorkshire and East Practice Learning Group.
CORE MENTOR UPDATE 2019 January This is the final version of the core update completed by the Midlands, Yorkshire and East Practice Learning Group.
CORE MENTOR UPDATE 2019 January This is the final version of the core update completed by the Midlands, Yorkshire and East Practice Learning Group.
Enhancing Learning in Practice
Presentation transcript:

Practice Education Facilitators

Quality Standards for Practice Placements (NES 2003)

Aim:- To raise awareness and knowledge of the Quality Standards for Practice Placements (QSPP). Specific Objectives:- 1. Understand the underpinning principles (background) to the QSPP. 2. Recognise the specific individual responsibilities of the student and mentors in the clinical learning process prior to, during, and on completion of the practice placement. 3. Understand the responsibilities of the student, mentor, service provider and establishments of Higher/Further Education. 4.Be aware of the potential optimal impact on learning with the implementation of the Quality Standards in each clinical learning environment/practice placement.

BACKGROUND TO QSPP QSPP were developed by NHS Education for Scotland in (NES 2003). These standards give an understanding of roles & responsibilities for students, mentors & service providers. Are applicable to any structured placement.

STUDENTS RESPONSIBILITIES PRIOR TO PLACEMENTS STANDARDS Prepared for practice Approved placement Named mentor Access to Standards INDICATORS Preparation, audit, allocation Comprehensive orientation Welcomed to placement

STUDENTS RESPONSIBILITIES DURING PRACTICE PLACEMENT STANDARDS Learning contract negotiated with mentor within 48 hours Freedom & support to learn & achieve outcomes Team approach Regular & consistent feedback – outcomes Fair & objective assessment Ongoing support HEI INDICATORS Named Mentor – experience/qualifications Named link - HEI Initial meeting with mentor – develop learning contract Multi-professional approach Area has philosophy of care Regular review of learning needs

STUDENTS RESPONSIBILITIES AFTER PRACTICE PLACEMENT STANDARDS Provide an evaluation of their placement experience INDICATORS Clear systems on guidance and feedback Clear systems for dealing with student issues Effective joint HEI/Service Provider evaluation Clear systems which link student evaluation into the provider quality enhancement agenda

MENTORS RESPONSIBILITIES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT STANDARDS Support network – clinical, educational colleagues, peers & managers Be prepared prior to student’s placement Student prepared & committed to achieving learning outcomes INDICATORS Adequate/timely information prior to students arrival Preparation time prior to students arrival Time on day 1 for student induction Knowledge of students learning needs Achievement of the staff governance standard in relation to training

MENTORS RESPONSIBILITIES DURING PRACTICE PLACEMENT STANDARDS Support, teach, supervise, assess Allocated time to assess students progress towards learning outcomes & competence Ongoing feedback & guidance to student Conduct fair & objective assessment INDICATORS Team mentoring approach Range of clinical colleagues who input to learning experience of the student Freedom/authority to plan & deliver learning opportunities to meet learning outcomes

MENTORS RESPONSIBILITIES AFTER PRACTICE PLACEMENTS STANDARDS Contribute to ongoing evaluation on the learning environment and the student experience INDICATORS Clear systems on guidance and feedback Clear systems for dealing with student issues Effective joint HEI/Service Provider evaluation Clear systems which link mentor evaluation into the quality enhancement agenda