Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 1 Deep Impact Overview/Status Flight Readiness Review January 8, 2005 Rick Grammier Project Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The BepiColombo Mission
Advertisements

Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
Superior Solar Conjunction Planning May 8, 2014 Dan Ossing STEREO Mission Operations Manager (240)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Stardust NExT Tim Larson, Project Manager EPOXI.
MEPAG National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Presentation to MEPAG.
A Synergistic Strategy for Robotic and Human NEO Exploration Tom Jones Florida Institute for Human & Machine Cognition IPEWG Aug 11 1.
Ch. 6 – Vagabonds of the Solar System There are several kinds of objects in our Solar System Terrestrial planets Jovian planets “debris” – asteroids, comets.
Small Telescope Science Program (STSP) Overview STSP Description STSP is a Pro-Am collaboration for NASA’s Deep Impact (DI) Mission. It is a world-wide.
GLAST LAT Instrument GLAST Monthly Mission Review October 5, 2007 K. Fouts, SLAC 1 Monthly Mission Review Project Status Overview October 5, 2007 Ken Fouts.
AAS - 1 Jun 2004sam - 1 The Small Telescope Science Program Deep Impact Mission Stephanie McLaughlin (Univ. of Maryland) Lucy McFadden (Univ. of Maryland)
Current Space Missions (Part 2)
Deep Impact First look inside a comet Dr. Paul Roche Faulkes Telescope Project Cardiff University.
Mars Exploration By Jacob Stinar. Water on Mars.
Constellation Orion Visible Light Constellation Orion Infrared Light.
As of 1995, 878 comets have been cataloged and their orbits at least roughly calculated. Of these 184 are periodic comets (orbital periods less than 200.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Comet Impact: July 4, 2005 Impact Velocity: 23,000 mph Spacecraft Size: Flyby spacecraft - nearly as large as a Volkswagen Beetle automobile. Impactor.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
Bob G. Beaman June 28, 2001 Electrical Power System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
Dynamic Design: Launch and Propulsion Genesis Launch Vehicle: The Delta Rocket Student Text Supplement.
( ELR) - 1 STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission STEREO SWG STEREO OBSERVATORY Status Edward Reynolds APL STEREO Project Manager.
Van Allen Probes Spacecraft Operations July 29, 2015 Kristin Fretz
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission STEREO STEREO Science Team Meeting May 2, 2005 Presented by Edward Reynolds APL STEREO Project.
For the last 20 years, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory has sponsored the Planetary Science Summer School (PSSS) to give faculty, postdocs, and graduate students.
1 Observatory I&T and Launch Campaign Flow Greg Jones May 20, 2009 JWST-PRES
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
DEEP IMPACT The Mission Now
FIRST/Planck 12 December 2000PT The FIRST Mission Implementation Status and Schedule T. Passvogel The Promise of FIRST.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
LBNE Working Group Meeting December 20, :00– 5:00 PM Snake Pit.
Deep Impact Continued Investigations (DI3) Tony Farnham.
LIFE: Traceability Matrix Team Members JPL: P. Tsou, I. Kanik NASA Ames: C. McKay UoW: D. Brownlee Mission Cost Since formal costing is yet to be performed,
Observation of molecules in Comets with Odin and Deep Impact I Observation of the 557GHz water line in comets with Odin Monitoring of water outgassing,
Presented to Kepler Pre-Launch Educator Workshop January 31, 2009 Shari Asplund Discovery and New Frontiers Programs Education and Public Outreach Manager.
Rosetta is the first mission designed to both orbit and land on a comet. It will complete.
1 JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams.
LRO/LCROSS Launch Preview How Where When Presentation for NASA Solar System Ambassadors and Museum Alliance March 20, 2009 Brooke Hsu, LRO E/PO Lead Brian.
GEEN 2850 / REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: _01 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE CU Balloon Experimental Satellite (CUBESAT)
Mission Operations –Launch February 15, 2000 at 22:02:15 UTC = 14:02:15 PST –41 Days IOC and antenna deployment period –2 year science mission operations.
MARS ORBITER MISSION (MANGALYAAN) PRESENTED BY,PRESENTED BY,RAMYA.K M.TECH COS 1 st yrM.TECH COS 1 st yr.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun Mission Operations Review News Elena Adams 7/16/2015.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
“Deep Impact” onto Comet 9P/Tempel 1 July 3 rd, 2005 Images and show created at the Dark Ridge Observatory (DRO) by Thomas C. Smith, Director.
LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview.
STARDUST 20 Nov 2003CERR - Shyam Bhaskaran1 of 10 STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER Autonomous Nucleus Tracking.
Mission Development: Putting It All Together ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
THEMIS MRRI&T − 1GSFC, January 5, 2007 Integration and Test.
DEEP IMPACT Mission To Comet 9P/Tempel 1. Deep Impact What Kind of Mission is it? A Discovery Mission Explore the interior of the nucleus of Comet 9P/Tempel.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Japanese mission of the two moons of Mars with sample return from Phobos Hirdy Miyamoto (Univ Tokyo) on behalf of MMX team NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER:
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
STARDUST 20 Nov 2003CERR - R. Newburn1 of 5 STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER Science Operations Ray Newburn JPL:
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
OSIRIS operation summary
Technical Resource Allocations
Data Utilization Reset
Failure of Process / Failure of Mission
Philae status 21st Rosetta Science Team meeting
Tomas Kohout, Antti Näsilä, Tuomas Tikka, Mikael Granvik, Antti Kestilä, Antti Penttilä, Janne Kuhno, Karri Muinonen, Kai Viherkanto, Esa Kallio VTT Technical.
Integration, Test, and Calibration
After School Astronomy Clubs Dorian Janney
After School Astronomy Clubs Dorian Janney
Presentation transcript:

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 1 Deep Impact Overview/Status Flight Readiness Review January 8, 2005 Rick Grammier Project Manager

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 2 Project Overview Salient Features Deliver a 370 kg impactor at 10 km/s to open the interior of a comet nucleus. Target is Comet P/Tempel 1. Impactor produces crater dependent on comet porosity and strength. Flyby spacecraft observes impact, crater development, ejecta and final crater with visible and IR multi-spectral instruments. On-board autonomous optical navigation used for precise targeting and control of impactor and fly-by spacecraft. 6 month mission duration. Launch: Jan 12, 2004 Encounter: July 4, Science To determine the differences between the interior of a cometary nucleus and its surface. Determine basic cometary properties by observing how the crater forms after impact. To identify materials in the pristine comet interior by measuring the composition of the ejecta from the comet crater. Determine the changes in natural outgassing of the comet produced by the impact. To help discover whether comets lose their ice, or seal it in over time (evidence for dormancy vs. extinction). Address terrestrial hazard from cometary impacts.

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 3 Interplanetary Trajectory 6-month direct trajectory meets Tempel 1 near perihelion Launch Jan. 12, 2005 S/C Earth Orbit X Earth at Encounter Impact! July 4, 2005 Tempel 1 Orbit (5.5 yr Period) Sun

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 4

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 5

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 6

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 7

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 8 Launch Sequence Timeline

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 9 Reviews Schedule SMARR12/22/04Complete Mission Readiness Review12/27/04Complete JPL GPMC12/28/04Complete Mission Readiness Brief12/29/04Complete Launch Site Readiness Review12/30/04Complete Flight Readiness Review1/8/05 Mission Dress Rehearsal1/10/05 Launch Readiness Review1/11/05 Post Launch Assessment Review2/16/05 Encounter Risk Review4/13/05 Critical Events Readiness Review6/2/05 JPL GPMC6/15/05 Encounter Brief to HQ6/22/05

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 10 DI Launch Site Operations Boeing Integrated Operations Long days >10 hours, 2 sh = 2 shift, 7am to 11pm (2 teams minimum) 24h = around the clock ops 24 hours per day (3 teams minimum) Move To KSC & Pad Preps Early AM 1/3 Move To KSC & Pad Preps Early AM 1/3 DI SC Erection SC Power On SC (T-8) 1/3 DI SC Erection SC Power On SC (T-8) 1/3 FSW Load & Pad Functional (T-7) 1/4 FSW Load & Pad Functional (T-7) 1/4 Flight Prog Verification Stray Volts Initiate Batt Charge (T-6) 1/5 Flight Prog Verification Stray Volts Initiate Batt Charge (T-6) 1/5 Fairing finaling SC-Post PLF installation aliveness test Reinitiate Batt Trickle charge (T-3) 1/8 Fairing finaling SC-Post PLF installation aliveness test Reinitiate Batt Trickle charge (T-3) 1/8 Prop Sys and MST move preps S/C Final Closeout & Power On (T-1) 1/11 Prop Sys and MST move preps S/C Final Closeout & Power On (T-1) 1/11 Mission Dress Rehearsal/2 nd Stage Prop Loading Batt Trickle charge (T-2) 1/10 Mission Dress Rehearsal/2 nd Stage Prop Loading Batt Trickle charge (T-2) 1/10 Launch Readiness Review (LRR) (T-1) 1/11 Launch Readiness Review (LRR) (T-1) 1/11 Launch Countdown Batt Trickle Charge (T-0) 1/12 Launch Countdown Batt Trickle Charge (T-0) 1/12 Start Trickle Charge – 24hr/day 7day/wk Except 1/7 From: XMAS Fairing Install No Batt Trickle charge Activity (T-4) 1/7 Fairing Install No Batt Trickle charge Activity (T-4) 1/7 Canning Day 1/2 Canning Day 1/2 Mate w/ PAF, 3 rd Stage 2 days 12/29-30 Mate w/ PAF, 3 rd Stage 2 days 12/29-30 New years (Env monitor) 2 days 12/31-1/1 New years (Env monitor) 2 days 12/31-1/1 LV Ordnance installation SC Closeout (T-5) 1/6 LV Ordnance installation SC Closeout (T-5) 1/6 SA Stow Closeout Wet Weigh 1day 12/28 SA Stow Closeout Wet Weigh 1day 12/28 FRR 1/8 S/C Batt Trickle Charge (SUN) 1/9 S/C Batt Trickle Charge (SUN) 1/9

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 11 Previous Issues Closure of Mission Readiness Review (MRR) action items –Completed 1/7/05 Complete pre-launch work-to-go as briefed at MRR –Completed 1/7/05

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 12 Impact of BET Change DI did not want to accept delta-V budget hit caused by injection biases Correcting the RLA biases required earlier launch and thus moved the separation times earlier (key to our issue) Earlier separation impacts the S/C critical sequence –Project did not want to change the critical sequence and inherent logic that has been tested for two years –For the first launch azimuth on Jan 12th only, this meant the S/C would “sit” for several seconds after separation waiting for the critical sequence to start. This brought in to question the viability of the fault protection response logic –Change would mean additional regeneration of products and retest for the first azimuth only, and a different set of products for all other opportunities Not where we want to be this close to launch when the team is concentrating on preparations for operations The decision to not use the first azimuth was the least risk approach for the mission, retained the critical sequence and fault protection logic in its as tested configuration, and (by the way) did not impact the project’s delta-V budget

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 13 Current Status/Open Work Final closure of problem report on SCU/CPU reset during pad functional test on 1/4/05 –GSE/ground configuration issue –No residual risk for flight

Deep Impact FRRJan. 8, 2005Page 14 Readiness Statement Deep Impact is ready to continue processing for launch