P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia. Assessment on the Milestones 2000 Maria Grazia Pia Geant4 Workshop Paris, 16-20 October 2000

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Test & Analysis Project Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova on behalf of the T&A team
Advertisements

Configuration Management
QuEdge Testing Process Delivering Global Solutions.
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova, Italy Advanced software engineering in simulation development and.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Low Energy Electromagnetic Physics Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova on behalf of the Low Energy Electromagnetic WG Geant4 Workshop.
Maria Grazia Pia Geant4 LowE Workshop 30-31/5/2002 ow Energy e.m. Workshop CERN, May 2002.
Geant4 Workshop 2004 Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Training by INFN and not-INFN collaborators Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova on behalf of an international.
Space Environments and Effects Section 7 October 2005SPENVIS-GEANT4 Space Users' Workshop Planned ESA GEANT4 Activities Petteri Nieminen, ESA/ESTEC Space.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Low Energy Electromagnetic Physics Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova on behalf of the Low Energy Electromagnetic WG Geant4 Workshop.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova 1 Part V The lesson learned Summary and conclusions.
Geant4-Genova Group Validation of Susanna Guatelli, Alfonso Mantero, Barbara Mascialino, Maria Grazia Pia, Valentina Zampichelli INFN Genova, Italy IEEE.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova PhysicsLists in Geant4 Advanced Examples M.G.
What is workflow?  A workflow is a structured way of defining and automating structures and procedures within an organization. What is workflow management.
SDLC. Information Systems Development Terms SDLC - the development method used by most organizations today for large, complex systems Systems Analysts.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova CERN, 26 July 2004 Background of the Project.
1 M.G. Pia et al. The application of GEANT4 simulation code for brachytherapy treatment Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova, Italy and CERN/IT
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Low Energy Electromagnetic Physics Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova – CHEP 2001 ow Energy Electromagnetic Physics ow Energy Electromagnetic Physics S. Chauvie,G. Depaola, F. Longo, V. Ivanchenko,
Maria Grazia Pia Systematic validation of Geant4 electromagnetic and hadronic models against proton data Systematic validation of Geant4 electromagnetic.
Budker Inst. of Physics IHEP Protvino MEPHI Moscow Pittsburg University.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Low Energy Electromagnetic Physics R. Capra, S. Chauvie, G.A.P. Cirrone, G. Cuttone, F. Di Rosa, Z. Francis, S. Guatelli,
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Software Process: Physics Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova on behalf of the Geant4 Collaboration Budker Inst. of Physics IHEP.
CLEANROOM SOFTWARE ENGINEERING.
P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia Achievements of the LowE e.m. WG Petteri Nieminen & Maria Grazia Pia Geant4 Workshop Paris, October 2000
Thirteenth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 am, Sunday, September 16 Software Management Disciplines Process Automation (from Part III, Chapter 12 of Royce’ book)
©Ian Sommerville 2000, Mejia-Alvarez 2009 Slide 1 Software Processes l Coherent sets of activities for specifying, designing, implementing and testing.
M.G. Pia et al. Brachytherapy at IST Results from an atypical Comparison Project Stefano Agostinelli 1,2, Franca Foppiano 1, Stefania Garelli 1, Matteo.
Usability Issues Documentation J. Apostolakis for Geant4 16 January 2009.
OOAD… LowE Electrons From HEP computing to medical research and vice versa Bidirectional From HEP computing to medical research and vice versa Bidirectional.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova User Requirements: Maria Grazia Pia Genova, 29 September 2000 Capture Geant4-DNA.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Test & Analysis Project aka “statistical testing” Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova on behalf of the T&A team
Riccardo Capra 1, Stéphane Chauvie 2, Ziad Francis 3, Sebastien Incerti 4, Barbara Mascialino 1, Gerard Montarou 3, Philippe Moretto 4, Petteri Nieminen.
Susanna Guatelli & Barbara Mascialino G.A.P. Cirrone (INFN LNS), G. Cuttone (INFN LNS), S. Donadio (INFN,Genova), S. Guatelli (INFN Genova), M. Maire (LAPP),
Geant4 Space User Workshop 2004 Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Proposal of a Space Radiation Environment Generator interfaced to Geant4 S. Guatelli 1, P.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Training Genova 2-6 July 2001 Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova.
IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Short Course The Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Sunanda Banerjee (Saha Inst. Nucl. Phys., Kolkata,
Detector Simulation Presentation # 3 Nafisa Tasneem CHEP,KNU  How to do HEP experiment  What is detector simulation?
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova - DNA. Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Based on Partly funded by Geant4-DNA Simulation of Interactions of Radiation with Biological.
Precision Validation of Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Geant4 DNA Project Meeting 26 July 2004, CERN Michela.
Data Integrity # Best Practices & Lessons Learned. Does It Fit Your Organization?
Geant4 Training 2006 Short Course Katsuya Amako (KEK) Gabriele Cosmo (CERN) Susanna Guatelli (INFN Genova) Aatos Heikkinen (Helsinki Institute of Physics)
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova Statistics Toolkit Project Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova AIDA Workshop.
P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia Summary of the LowE e.m. WG week and common LowE/Standard e.m. sessions Petteri Nieminen & Maria Grazia Pia Geant4 Workshop Paris,
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Geant4 Training 2004 Short Course Katsuya Amako (KEK) Gabriele Cosmo (CERN) Giuseppe Daquino (CERN) Susanna Guatelli (INFN Genova) Aatos Heikkinen (Helsinki.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova and CERN1 Geant4 highlights of relevance for medical physics applications Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova and CERN.
This chapter is extracted from Sommerville’s slides. Textbook chapter 22 1 Chapter 8 Validation and Verification 1.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova - G4 WG Coord. Meeting, 13/11/2001 ow Energy Electromagnetic Physics ow Energy Electromagnetic Physics New physics features.
SPECTO IT TRAINING Contact us: INDIA: , USA : ,
Verification and Validation. Topics covered l Verification and validation planning l Program Testing l Software inspections.
Configuration Management
Configuration Management
Salamanca, July 2002 Geant4 simulation of the energy loss of slow negatively-charged hadrons Stephane Chauvie José M. Fernández-Varea Vladimir N. Ivanchenko.
Low Energy Electromagnetic Physics
Introductory Course PTB, Braunschweig, June 2009
G.Cosmo - URD improvements Gabriele Cosmo (CERN/IT-API)
Short Course Siena, 5-6 October 2006
Collaborative planning for ion physics activities
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Workshop Genova July
M.G. Pia on behalf of the Physics Book Team
Introductory Course ORNL, May 2008
Short Course IEEE NSS/MIC 2003 Katsuya Amako (KEK) Makoto Asai (SLAC)
November 1, 2007 In cooperation with:
Radiation damage at cellular and DNA level
The Geant4 Hadrontherapy Advanced Example
Testing Workshop.
Overview Activities from additional UP disciplines are needed to bring a system into being Implementation Testing Deployment Configuration and change management.
Presentation transcript:

P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia. Assessment on the Milestones 2000 Maria Grazia Pia Geant4 Workshop Paris, October

P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia. Physics and SPI 4Assessment and improvements of the current physics implementation (mandatory) LImplementation of the Auger effect (mandatory) LLow energy extensions for positrons (mandatory) 4Extensions to lower energies of protons and ions and simulation of straggling (mandatory) 4Extension to lower energies of antiprotons (mandatory) KLow energy extensions for negative ions (desirable) KExtensions to lower energies of electrons and photons (optional) 4Explicit definition and documentation of procedures (mandatory) 4Major improvement of the design (mandatory) 4Major improvement of the software quality (desirable) KImprovement of performance in critical areas (desirable) LSet-up of a full testing suite and thorough testing of the software and physics (mandatory) 4Defect analysis and prevention (desirable) 4Complete and accurate documentation coverage (desirable) 4Internal training (desirable)

P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia. Publications and design 4Preprint on antiprotons (mandatory) KPreprint on negative ions (desirable) KPreprint on positrons (desirable) KPreprints on further extensions and updates (desirable) KPreprint on design (desirable) KPreprint on software process (desirable) LPaper on refereed journal on electrons, positrons, photons (mandatory) LPaper on refereed journal on hadrons (mandatory) LPaper on refereed journal on ions (mandatory) LOO design iteration in the data domain (mandatory) KOO design iteration in the electron- photon domain (desirable) 4OO design iteration in the hadron- ion domain (mandatory) KOO design iteration at the top level of electromagnetic processes to remove Standard and Low Energy cross-dependencies (desirable) 4Reorganisation of the physical design of the electromagnetic package (desirable)

P. Nieminen & M.G. Pia. Testing  Clear separation of the testing from the examples (mandatory)  Distinction of debugging, software testing and physics testing (desirable)  Definition and documentation of testing requirements (mandatory)  Definition and documentation of testing procedures (mandatory)  Integration of testing into the software lifecycle (desirable)  Test planning (mandatory)  Clear assignment of responsibilities for testing tools developments and testing execution (mandatory)  Development of unit testing tools (mandatory)  Development of integration testing tools (optional)  Improvement of system testing tools (desirable)  Improvement of physics testing tools (desirable)  Verification of compliance with requirements (optional)  Documentation of testing tools and reference test results (desirable)  Creation and maintenance of a test case repository (desirable)  Collaboration with users in the testing process (optional)  Continuous improvement of the testing system, based on defect analysis and contacts with users (optional)