DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Enhancing Professional Practice
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
When the State Hands You Lemons: Making Lemonade Out Of the New APPR
EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Is Danielson or Marzano Right for You?
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Educational Performance Incentive Compensation
The Danielson Model: What Does This Mean for Lutheran Educators?
Differentiated Supervision
Multi Measure Educator Effectiveness
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Frameworks for Teaching Observation Points for the Classroom The components and elements of Domains 2 (environment) and 3 (instruction) can be directly.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN-SERVICE DAY OCTOBER 10, 2014 HIGH SCHOOL MEDIA CENTER Thomas Weber, Supervisor of Fine and Performing Arts.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
The 6 Components of DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Joseph Buffington Teaching Portfolio
Presentation transcript:

DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers

Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment Clarity Balance Suitability for diverse learners

Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1b: Designing Coherent Instruction ELEMENT Learning activities Instructional materials and resources Instructional groups Lesson and unit structure

Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1c: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy ELEMENT Knowledge of content & the structure of the discipline Knowledge of prerequisite relationships

Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students ELEMENT Knowledge of child and adolescent development Knowledge of the learning process Knowledge of students’ skills, knowledge, & language proficiency Knowledge of students’ interests & cultural heritage Knowledge of students’ special needs

Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1e: Designing Student Assessments ELEMENT Congruence with instructional outcome Criteria and standards Design of formative assessments Use for planning

Component 2: Classroom Environment Criterion 2a: Managing Classroom Procedures ELEMENT Management of instructional groups Management of transitions Management of materials and supplies Performance of non-instructional duties

Component 2: Classroom Environment Criterion 2b: Managing Student Behavior ELEMENT Expectations Monitoring of student behavior Response to student misbehavior

Component 2: Classroom Environment Criterion 2c: Establishing a Culture for Learning ELEMENT Teacher interaction with students Student interactions with other students Importance of the content Expectations for learning and achievement Student pride in work

Component 2: Classroom Environment Criterion 2d: Organizing Physical Space ELEMENT Safety and accessibility Arrangement of furniture and use of physical resources

Component 3: Instruction Criterion 3a: Engaging Students in Learning ELEMENT Activities and assignments Grouping of students Instructional materials and resources Structure and pacing of the lesson

Component 3: Instruction Criterion 3b: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness ELEMENT Lesson Adjustment Response to students Persistence

Component 3: Instruction Criterion 3c: Communicating Clearly and Accurately ELEMENT Expectations for learning Directions and procedures Explanations of content

Component 3: Instruction Criterion 3d: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques ELEMENT Quality of questions Discussion techniques Student participation

Component 3: Instruction Criterion 3e: Using Assessment in Instruction ELEMENT Assessment criteria Monitoring of student learning Feedback to students Student self- assessment & monitoring of progress

Component 4: Professional Responsibilities Criterion 4a: Communicating with Families ELEMENT Information about the instructional program Information about individual students Engagement of families in instructional program

Component 4: Professional Responsibilities Criterion 4b: Recording data in a Student Record System ELEMENT Student completion of assignments Student progress in learning Non-instructional records

Component 4: Professional Responsibilities Criterion 4c: Growing and Developing Professionally ELEMENT Enhancement of content knowledge and pedagogical skills Receptivity to feedback from colleagues Service to the profession

Component 4: Professional Responsibilities Criterion 4d: ELEMENT Accuracy Use in future teaching