© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 12 Uncertainty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Supply of Labor Labor Economics Copyright © 2011 by W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Advertisements

Hal Varian Intermediate Microeconomics Chapter Thirteen
Choice under Uncertainty. Introduction Many choices made by consumers take place under conditions of uncertainty Therefore involves an element of risk.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Chapter 12 Uncertainty Consider two lotteries L 1 : 500,000 (1) L 1 ’: 2,500,000 (0.1), 500,000 (0.89), 0 (0.01) Which one would you choose? Another two.
1 Demand for Health Insurance. 2 Which Investment will you pick Expected Value $2600 Choice 2 $5000 -$ Choice 1 $5000 $
Choices Involving Risk
1 . 2 Uncertainty Dixit: Optimization in Economic Theory (Chapter 9)
Risky Choices and Risk Aversion
Chapter Eleven Asset Markets. Assets u An asset is a commodity that provides a flow of services over time. u E.g. a house, or a computer. u A financial.
Decision-Making under Uncertainty – Part I Topic 4.
Economics 202: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory 1.HW #5 on website. Due Tuesday.
The Economics of Information. Risk a situation in which there is a probability that an event will occur. People tend to prefer greater certainty and less.
Risk a situation in which there is a probability that an event will occur. People tend to prefer greater certainty and less risk.
317_L13, Feb 5, 2008, J. Schaafsma 1 Review of the Last Lecture finished our discussion of the demand for healthcare today begin our discussion of market.
Consumer Choice From utility to demand. Scarcity and constraints Economics is about making choices.  Everything has an opportunity cost (scarcity): You.
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
Copyright © 2004 South-Western 27 The Basic Tools of Finance.
Chapter Twelve Uncertainty. Uncertainty is Pervasive u What is uncertain in economic systems? –tomorrow’s prices –future wealth –future availability of.
Chapter Twelve Uncertainty. Uncertainty is Pervasive u What is uncertain in economic systems? –tomorrow’s prices –future wealth –future availability of.
Extensions to Consumer theory Inter-temporal choice Uncertainty Revealed preferences.
Chapter 3: Consumer Behavior 1 of 37 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. MARGINAL.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Chapter Twelve Uncertainty. Uncertainty is Pervasive u What is uncertain in economic systems? –tomorrow’s prices –future wealth –future availability of.
The Basic Tools of Finance
Schedule of Classes September, 3 September, 10 September, 17 – in-class#1 September, 19 – in-class#2 September, 24 – in-class#3 (open books) September,
Full Insurance Theorem Risks to Wealth. Motives  Practical risk management  Analysis: base case  First example of general principles.
Lecture 3: Arrow-Debreu Economy
19 Profit-Maximization.
Steven Landsburg, University of Rochester Chapter 18 Risk and Uncertainty Copyright ©2005 by Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
Lecture # 2 Review Go over Homework Sets #1 & #2 Consumer Behavior APPLIED ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
Chapter 5 Choice.
Microeconomics Corso E John Hey. Chapters 23, 24 and 25 CHOICE UNDER RISK Chapter 23: The Budget Constraint. Chapter 24: The Expected Utility Model. Chapter.
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.Chapter 52 Q: Value of Stock Investment in offshore drilling exploration: Two.
Chapter 5 Choice Under Uncertainty. Chapter 5Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed Describing Risk Preferences Toward Risk Reducing Risk The Demand for Risky.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Choice. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that.
Uncertainty. u What is uncertain in economic systems? –tomorrow’s prices –future wealth –future availability of commodities –present and future actions.
Decision theory under uncertainty
Indifference Curves Locus of points representing different bundles of two goods, each of which yields the same level of total utility. It is a graphical.
The Economics of Information and Choice Under Uncertainty.
What is ‘Managed Care’? A ‘type’ of health insurance –combines both the financing of care (insurance) with the provision of care –variations in MC plans.
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior Chapter 5. Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior 1.In order to compare the riskiness of alternative choices, we need to.
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc Chapter 17 Choice Making Under Uncertainty.
Chapter Seventeen Uncertainty. © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Topics  Degree of Risk.  Decision Making Under Uncertainty.
Chapter 19 Appendix: Indifference Curves McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 13e.
5-1 Economics: Theory Through Applications. 5-2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Managerial Economics Uncertainty Aalto University School of Science Department of Industrial Engineering and Management January 12 – 28, 2016 Dr. Arto.
Microeconomics Course E John Hey. Chapter 26 Because we are all enjoying risk so much, I have decided not to cover Chapter 26 (on the labour market)
Rational Consumer Choice Chapter 3. Rational Choice Theory Assumption that consumers enter the market place with clear preferences Price takers Consumers.
Extensions to Consumer theory Inter-temporal choice Uncertainty Revealed preferences.
Chapter 12 Uncertainty 1. Uncertainty is Pervasive  What is uncertainty in economic systems?  tomorrow’s prices  future wealth  future availability.
Risk and Uncertainty When we represent outcomes as possibilities rather than a deterministic outcome, we must address feelings about risk. Why would risk.
L6: Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing1 Lecture 6: Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing The following topics will be covered: Pareto Efficient Risk Allocation –Defining.
L12 Uncertainty. Model with real endowments 1. Labor Supply (Labor-Leisure Choice) 2. Intertemporal Choice (Consumption-Savings Choice) 3. Uncertainty.
L11 Uncertainty.
The Economics of Information and Choice Under Uncertainty
Microeconomics 2 John Hey.
12 Uncertainty.
L12 Uncertainty.
Midterm Review.
L11 Uncertainty.
Buying and Selling: Uncertainty
L12 Uncertainty.
Chapter Twelve Uncertainty.
Buying and Selling: Uncertainty
Chapter 12 Uncertainty.
Buying and Selling: Uncertainty
Presentation transcript:

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 12 Uncertainty

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Uncertainty is Pervasive u What is uncertain in economic systems? –tomorrow’s prices –future wealth –future availability of commodities –present and future actions of other people.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3 Uncertainty is Pervasive u What are rational responses to uncertainty? –buying insurance (health, life, auto) –a portfolio of contingent consumption goods.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 4 States of Nature u Possible states of Nature: –“car accident” (a) –“no car accident” (na). u Accident occurs with probability  a, does not with probability  na ;  a +  na = 1. u Accident causes a loss of $L.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Contingencies u A contract implemented only when a particular state of Nature occurs is state-contingent. u E.g. the insurer pays only if there is an accident.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 6 Contingencies u A state-contingent consumption plan is implemented only when a particular state of Nature occurs. u E.g. take a vacation only if there is no accident.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 7 State-Contingent Budget Constraints u Each $1 of accident insurance costs . u Consumer has $m of wealth. u C na is consumption value in the no- accident state. u C a is consumption value in the accident state.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 8 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 9 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa A state-contingent consumption with $17 consumption value in the accident state and $20 consumption value in the no-accident state.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 10 State-Contingent Budget Constraints u Without insurance, u C a = m - L u C na = m.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 11 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m The endowment bundle.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 12 State-Contingent Budget Constraints u Buy $K of accident insurance. u C na = m -  K. u C a = m - L -  K + K = m - L + (1-  )K.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 13 State-Contingent Budget Constraints u Buy $K of accident insurance. u C na = m -  K. u C a = m - L -  K + K = m - L + (1-  )K. u So K = (C a - m + L)/(1-  )

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 14 State-Contingent Budget Constraints u Buy $K of accident insurance. u C na = m -  K. u C a = m - L -  K + K = m - L + (1-  )K. u So K = (C a - m + L)/(1-  ) u And C na = m -  (C a - m + L)/(1-  )

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 15 State-Contingent Budget Constraints u Buy $K of accident insurance. u C na = m -  K. u C a = m - L -  K + K = m - L + (1-  )K. u So K = (C a - m + L)/(1-  ) u And C na = m -  (C a - m + L)/(1-  ) u I.e.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 16 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m The endowment bundle.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 17 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m The endowment bundle.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 18 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m The endowment bundle. Where is the most preferred state-contingent consumption plan?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Preferences Under Uncertainty u Think of a lottery. u Win $90 with probability 1/2 and win $0 with probability 1/2. u U($90) = 12, U($0) = 2. u Expected utility is

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 20 Preferences Under Uncertainty u Think of a lottery. u Win $90 with probability 1/2 and win $0 with probability 1/2. u U($90) = 12, U($0) = 2. u Expected utility is

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 21 Preferences Under Uncertainty u Think of a lottery. u Win $90 with probability 1/2 and win $0 with probability 1/2. u Expected money value of the lottery is

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Preferences Under Uncertainty u EU = 7 and EM = $45. u U($45) > 7  $45 for sure is preferred to the lottery  risk-aversion. u U($45) < 7  the lottery is preferred to $45 for sure  risk-loving. u U($45) = 7  the lottery is preferred equally to $45 for sure  risk- neutrality.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 23 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$ $45 EU=7

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 24 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$90 12 U($45) U($45) > EU  risk-aversion. 2 EU=7 $45

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 25 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$90 12 U($45) U($45) > EU  risk-aversion. 2 EU=7 $45 MU declines as wealth rises.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 26 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$ EU=7 $45

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 27 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$90 12 U($45) < EU  risk-loving. 2 EU=7 $45 U($45)

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 28 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$90 12 U($45) < EU  risk-loving. 2 EU=7 $45 MU rises as wealth rises. U($45)

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 29 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$ EU=7 $45

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 30 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$90 12 U($45) = EU  risk-neutrality. 2 U($45)= EU=7 $45

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 31 Preferences Under Uncertainty Wealth$0$90 12 U($45) = EU  risk-neutrality. 2 $45 MU constant as wealth rises. U($45)= EU=7

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 32 Preferences Under Uncertainty u State-contingent consumption plans that give equal expected utility are equally preferred.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 33 Preferences Under Uncertainty C na CaCa EU 1 EU 2 EU 3 Indifference curves EU 1 < EU 2 < EU 3

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 34 Preferences Under Uncertainty u What is the MRS of an indifference curve? u Get consumption c 1 with prob.  1 and c 2 with prob.  2 (  1 +  2 = 1). u EU =  1 U(c 1 ) +  2 U(c 2 ). u For constant EU, dEU = 0.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 35 Preferences Under Uncertainty

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 36 Preferences Under Uncertainty

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 37 Preferences Under Uncertainty

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 38 Preferences Under Uncertainty

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 39 Preferences Under Uncertainty

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 40 Preferences Under Uncertainty C na CaCa EU 1 EU 2 EU 3 Indifference curves EU 1 < EU 2 < EU 3

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 41 Choice Under Uncertainty u Q: How is a rational choice made under uncertainty? u A: Choose the most preferred affordable state-contingent consumption plan.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 42 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m The endowment bundle. Where is the most preferred state-contingent consumption plan?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 43 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m The endowment bundle. Where is the most preferred state-contingent consumption plan? Affordable plans

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 44 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m Where is the most preferred state-contingent consumption plan? More preferred

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 45 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m Most preferred affordable plan

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 46 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m Most preferred affordable plan

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 47 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m Most preferred affordable plan MRS = slope of budget constraint

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 48 State-Contingent Budget Constraints C na CaCa m Most preferred affordable plan MRS = slope of budget constraint; i.e.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 49 Competitive Insurance u Suppose entry to the insurance industry is free. u Expected economic profit = 0. u I.e.  K -  a K - (1 -  a )0 = (  -  a )K = 0. u I.e. free entry   =  a. u If price of $1 insurance = accident probability, then insurance is fair.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 50 Competitive Insurance u When insurance is fair, rational insurance choices satisfy

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 51 Competitive Insurance u When insurance is fair, rational insurance choices satisfy u I.e.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 52 Competitive Insurance u When insurance is fair, rational insurance choices satisfy u I.e. u Marginal utility of income must be the same in both states.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 53 Competitive Insurance u How much fair insurance does a risk- averse consumer buy?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 54 Competitive Insurance u How much fair insurance does a risk- averse consumer buy? u Risk-aversion  MU(c)  as c .

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 55 Competitive Insurance u How much fair insurance does a risk- averse consumer buy? u Risk-aversion  MU(c)  as c . u Hence

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 56 Competitive Insurance u How much fair insurance does a risk- averse consumer buy? u Risk-aversion  MU(c)  as c . u Hence u I.e. full-insurance.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 57 “Unfair” Insurance u Suppose insurers make positive expected economic profit. u I.e.  K -  a K - (1 -  a )0 = (  -  a )K > 0.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 58 “Unfair” Insurance u Suppose insurers make positive expected economic profit. u I.e.  K -  a K - (1 -  a )0 = (  -  a )K > 0. u Then   >  a 

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 59 “Unfair” Insurance u Rational choice requires

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 60 “Unfair” Insurance u Rational choice requires u Since

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 61 “Unfair” Insurance u Rational choice requires u Since u Hence for a risk-averter.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 62 “Unfair” Insurance u Rational choice requires u Since u Hence for a risk-averter. u I.e. a risk-averter buys less than full “unfair” insurance.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 63 Uncertainty is Pervasive u What are rational responses to uncertainty? –buying insurance (health, life, auto) –a portfolio of contingent consumption goods.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 64 Uncertainty is Pervasive u What are rational responses to uncertainty? –buying insurance (health, life, auto) –a portfolio of contingent consumption goods.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 65 Uncertainty is Pervasive u What are rational responses to uncertainty? –buying insurance (health, life, auto) –a portfolio of contingent consumption goods. ?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 66 Diversification u Two firms, A and B. Shares cost $10. u With prob. 1/2 A’s profit is $100 and B’s profit is $20. u With prob. 1/2 A’s profit is $20 and B’s profit is $100. u You have $100 to invest. How?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 67 Diversification u Buy only firm A’s stock? u $100/10 = 10 shares. u You earn $1000 with prob. 1/2 and $200 with prob. 1/2. u Expected earning: $500 + $100 = $600

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 68 Diversification u Buy only firm B’s stock? u $100/10 = 10 shares. u You earn $1000 with prob. 1/2 and $200 with prob. 1/2. u Expected earning: $500 + $100 = $600

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 69 Diversification u Buy 5 shares in each firm? u You earn $600 for sure. u Diversification has maintained expected earning and lowered risk.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 70 Diversification u Buy 5 shares in each firm? u You earn $600 for sure. u Diversification has maintained expected earning and lowered risk. u Typically, diversification lowers expected earnings in exchange for lowered risk.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 71 Risk Spreading/Mutual Insurance u 100 risk-neutral persons each independently risk a $10,000 loss. u Loss probability = u Initial wealth is $40,000. u No insurance: expected wealth is

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 72 Risk Spreading/Mutual Insurance u Mutual insurance: Expected loss is u Each of the 100 persons pays $1 into a mutual insurance fund. u Mutual insurance: expected wealth is u Risk-spreading benefits everyone.