I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit VI: UEI Continual Evaluation SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General 24 June 2013 OVERALL.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.

Advertisements

Contextualising the learning process in Sports and Materials Science C.L Davis, M. Jenkins and E. Wilcock School of Engineering University of Birmingham.

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.

…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit IV: Management Inspection Control Toolset (MICT) SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit II: Unit Effectiveness Inspection (UEI) SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General 24.

OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit IX: Commander’s Inspection Report (CCIR) SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General 24.

Press Kit III: Commander’s Inspection Program (CCIP)

Pilot inspections summer 2011 SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.

TEMPLATE DESIGN © DE-PBS Key Features Evaluation: Matching Philosophy & Measurement Sarah K. Hearn, M.Ed., Delaware Positive.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit V: FAM Role in new AF Inspection System (AFIS) SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General.

Infogain Assessment Services 2007 Subtitle or Speaker Name Designation (Arial Regular, 18 Point)

1 April 2010 TX SET Timeline Project Conceptualization 11 weeks Market Requirements 12 weeks ERCOT Requirements 12 weeks Conceptual Design 6 weeks Detail.

Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.

FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit I: Air Force Inspection Introduction SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General 24 June.

‘Practice Makes Perfect’ Conference 28 June 2007 Assessment Centres.

© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Project Metrics QMS Training.

CIS 895 – MSE Project KDD-Research Entity Search Tool (KREST) Presentation 2 Eric Davis

Corporate Learning Course1 Mission Support Welcome.

2  Intent  Unit Responsibilities  Air Force Instruction  Building a Squadron Fitness Program  Nutritional Education and Resources  Various Exercise.

ISO 9001: 2000 Certified Audit Process What to do.

V3.7 WHY IS THERE A CAP INSPECTION PROGRAM Presented by: Colonel James F. Linker Colonel James F. Linker CAP Inspector General Colonel Lawrence Stys Colonel.

Quality Inspections Mr. Steve Orcutt and Mr. Robert Campbell 2 April 2015.

Section 1.1 Basic UN verification and investigation techniques UN Peacekeeping PDT Standards, Specialized Training Material for Military Experts on Mission.

Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.

2 OVERVIEW  Intent  Unit Responsibilities  Air Force Instruction.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.

OIG’S Audit Process Diane Kozinski Auditor. 2 MISSION STATEMENT OF OIG To serve the American Worker and Taxpayer by conducting audits, investigations,

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit VII: Unit Effectiveness Inspection (UEI) Lessons Learned SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector.

Ofsted Expectations – 2009 Framework Nicola Pruden St John Payne School 7 th December 2010.

Slide 1Lesson 9: Inspector General Program CAP Squadron Commanders and the Inspector General Partners for Excellence.

Fitness Intent Unit Responsibilities Air Force Instruction Nutritional Education 2.

1 Inspector General - Contracting 19 Mar 2004 Major Tim Durepo HQ AFMC/IGIC (937) Air Force Materiel Command Developing,

Ofsted framework September 2012 Changes and implications for Clerks and Governing Bodies Clerk briefings September 2012.

Commercial Project Reviews Information to assist with your project.

School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.

SUI Process Overview Timeline  60 Days before SUI Due Date  30 Days before SUI Due Date  10 Days before SUI Scheduled Date  5 Days before SUI Scheduled.

Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.

Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.

Project Management Processes for a Project

UNCLASSIFIED // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY CMD LOGO Operations Security (OPSEC) CMD LOGO Assessment in-brief DD MMM YYYY Presenter Contact information.

For more course tutorials visit CJS 250 Entire Course CJS 250 Week 1 Checkpoint Historical Laws and Security CJS 250 Week 1 Assignment.

An Overview of VPP VPP Benefits What Happens When OSHA Comes Onsite for VPP?

© JABEE 2015 Fundamental Concept of JABEE Evaluation and Accreditation JABEE evaluation and accreditation is to confirm the engineering educational program.

For More Tutorials BSHS 401 Entire Course (UOP Course) BSHS 401 Week 1 Discussion Question 1   BSHS 401 Week 1 Individual Assignment.

Executive Session Director’s Conceptual Design Review of Mu2e Project May 3-5, 2011 Jim Yeck.

BSHS 401 Entire Course FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT BSHS 401 Week 1 Individual Assignment Journal Entry One BSHS 401 Week 1 Individual.

Compliance with CCNA F.S..  Advertisement  Longlist  Shortlist  Request for Proposal  Scope of Services Meeting  Technical Proposal Review.

Preparing for your Site Visit

Q & A Overview of the Coalition Surge Test (CST)

Session 30 Transition to the Certification Phase of Training

CITIZENS SERVING COMMUNITIES

360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions

Analysis: Clarity of Scholarly Question Style & Scholarly Relevance

Mosby items and derived items © 2005 by Mosby, Inc.

Preparing New Principals Program

Aspiring Leaders Program

Corporate Learning Course

[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]

Sam Houston State University

Supplemental Independent Review Team - ESA Management Review

CMD LOGO Operations Security (OPSEC) Assessment in-brief Presenter

Subordinate Unit Inspection Preparation

Sam Houston State University

DISTAFF MEDIA WORKING GROUP

Mosby items and derived items © 2005 by Mosby, Inc.

Analysis: Clarity of Scholarly Question Style & Scholarly Relevance

Presentation transcript:

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Press Kit VI: UEI Continual Evaluation SAF/IGI Office of The Inspector General 24 June 2013 OVERALL BRIEFING CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Objectives Meet UEI direction in AFI , The Air Force Inspection System, GM-3 dated 13 February 2013, which defines the Continual Evaluation Phase A “Purpose…validate and verify a unit’s CCIP for accuracy and adequacy…provide the appropriate commander an independent assessment of the unit’s resource management, leadership, process improvement efforts and ability to execute the mission…” Program that provides MAJCOM/CC an accurate view of effectiveness of each wing Documents data collected for entire 24 month Continual Evaluation Phase for inclusion into capstone UEI report 2

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Continual Evaluation Phase Components On-Site Visits validate & verify (val/ver) the wing CCIP &/or assess portions of the four major graded areas (managing resources, leading people, improving the unit, and executing the mission) Typically consist of 2-10 MAJCOM IG inspectors May be no-notice, limited notice or scheduled Typically lasts 1-3 days On-Site Visits may include but are not limited to: Wing Inspection Team (WIT)-led evaluations & inspections Real world operations MICT validations IG interviews Command Interest Items & Special Interest Items 3

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Continual Evaluation Phase Components Virtual-Site Visits Remotely val/ver the wing CCIP &/or assess portions of the four major graded areas Uses all available data sources to include but not limited to WIT reports, MICT reviews, FAM inputs, Health of Wing meetings, NSI reports & Major Exercise reports Are no-notice and the unit will not normally be notified nor aware it is taking place Continual evaluation consolidation Synthesizes data collected during the continual evaluation phase – these are the pages of the photo album Completed prior to the on-site capstone 4

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Contact Information 5 UNCLASSIFIED