Summary FACT Trajectory & preparatory Workshop FACT lessons learnt Workshop Agriterra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coaching at work. programme aims The aims of the programme are twofold: To help you understand the nature of coaching, and illustrate its power in enabling.
Advertisements

Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Account Planning The purpose of these slides is to describe the Account Planning Process, the methodology, and the workload involved in running an account.
From Research to Advocacy
FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
How to Map a Sales Process That Creates Value for Customers! July 2003.
Introduction to Research Methodology
Envision SFA developing the next strategic plan….
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
Attracting the Young to Agriculture (IYFF agenda) AFA FACT Implementation.
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Human Rights Advocacy “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
A N I NTRODUCTION TO A DVOCACY : T RAINING G UIDE Ritu R. Sharma Women Thrive Worldwide Ritu R. Sharma Women Thrive Worldwide.
Action Research In Organizational Development. Action Research Coined by Kurt Lewin (MIT) in 1944 Reflective process of progressive problem solving Also.
Lord Mogg Chair of ERGEG Florence Forum June 2009 Implementation of the Third Energy Package.
Self Assessment Feedback Logistics R Us GOLD Member.
Nine steps of a good project planning
CR Toolkit Workshop CR Stakeholder Identification Tool ICMM Toolkit# 1 & 2 Trainers: Joe Samara and Merikas Timori Date: 07 th August 2013 Venue: CR Conference.
Advocacy.
Impact assessment framework
Water for a food-secure world The IWMI Community Engagement Training Module: Lessons from Ghana and Nepal by Prof. Saa Dittoh (University of Development.
Junta Nacional del Café- JNC Farmer organizations in value chain policy making Defense of the cooperative model Meike Carmen Willems Responsable del área.
BSBPMG502A Manage Project Scope Manage Project Scope Project Scope Processes Part 1 Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
D.Indra, NAMAC. Main points - Consultation to membership - youth members of NAMAC, through online discussion (Dec 25) and face to face (Dec 30) - Participatory.
Flanders project application and appraisal How it supports partnership.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
Policy Influencing strategies & Tactics. What is Public policy? Public policy: It is a guideline to the actions of the governments in addressing societal.
EU-CORD Advocacy Workshop November Expectations Give new direction and extra energy for EU-CORD’s advocacy in Brussels. Make people enthusiastic.
Applying FACT in the case of Puantani’s members on Enterprise Development FACT Lesson Learn Workshop Bali, 3-5 May 2014.
Measure current performance. Analyze the current performance. Improve performance. I Define the problem to be solved.
The importance of a preliminary analysis in the course production process Prepared by: Beatrice Ghirardini, Chiara Nicodemi, Fabiana Biasini Instructional.
By Nikka Rivera IYFF Project Coordinator, PAKISAMA.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‘Building up support for rural development’ May 2007 Radom-Pionki, Poland Network building & cooperation under Leader: benefits for local areas Martin.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
LESSON LEARNT ON PILOT FACT By Vietnam Farmers’ Union.
Report from the Trade Union Partnerships Working Group Meeting 23 rd September 2015.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
FEATS Project Zambia: Draft Terms of Reference for Second Phase Research Study A Policy Study of the linkages between Agricultural Productivity and Rural.
Right to Food Curriculum Overall Intent: Contribute to strengthening the in-country capacity to implement the right to food by different state duty bearers.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1 Geneva January 29, 2016.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
How to Write a Project Proposal Specialization Introductory Module Thursday, May 9, 2013 Barbados.
Chapter 5 Planning. Setting goals and deciding how to achieve them. Coping with uncertainty by formulating future courses of action to achieve specified.
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
Module 3 Engagement techniques 3b Running a SP Workshop.
Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
The most represented stakeholders within the NAPA process were governments, followed by research institutions, UN Agencies and local communities. Private.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Lecture 3: Procedures of extension work
SUPPORT TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT REFORM IN GEORGIA
Drafting a Climate Change Response Plan
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Conduction of a simulation considering cascading effects
Linking assurance and enhancement
7. EAFM process overview Version 1.
GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO ADVOCACY
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Advocacy Plan Introduction
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3 – Nature DG Environment, European Commission
Presentation transcript:

Summary FACT Trajectory & preparatory Workshop FACT lessons learnt Workshop Agriterra

The Objectives of the FACT trajectory Work done in three parts: 1. FACT Preparatory Workshop 2. Applying the FACT approach in practice 3. FACT Lessons Learnt Workshop To learn from personal experiences and the FACT approach for improving the preparation of policy and other types of proposals.

1. FACT preparatory Workshop (First part of the FACT Trajectory) FACT theory & practice: concepts, exchange and learning FACT theory & practice: concepts, exchange and learning of Definition of FACT concepts that can be added to the organisation’s work Preparation of a follow up plan: implementing some FACT concepts in the organisation’s work. Preparation of a follow up plan: implementing some FACT concepts in the organisation’s work.

2. Using the FACT in practice (Second part of the FACT Trajectory) Implementation of the plan defined by participants in the preparatory workshop Timing: 6 – 8 months –Between the two FACT workshops Timing: 6 – 8 months –Between the two FACT workshops

3. FACT lessons learnt workshop (Third part of the FACT Trajectory) Analysis of what was done in practice: Results so far and difficulties. Analysis of what was done in practice: Results so far and difficulties. Visions and ideas: Potential use of FACT by organisations in the future. Visions and ideas: Potential use of FACT by organisations in the future.

Preparatory Workshop: Session 1 Introduction to FACT Farmers Advocacy Consultation Tool

The four basic steps: building blocks of a FACT process Consultations to membership: Well-documented and registered membership consultations. Participatory research: in order to systematize the results and desk research to substantiate the proposals. Writing SMART proposals: elaboration of technically well prepared positions or proposals (policies, economic proposals etc.). Lobby mapping & Stakeholders analysis for a successful lobby /advocacy and negotiation of proposals.

FACT Preparatory Workshop Session 2 Consultations with membership

Consultations in the FACT approach Three main purposes of consultations (related to preparing position and proposals) To raise issues to be tackled by the organisation. To gather information to prepare proposals, positions, etc. To get feedback on the preparation of proposals and positions and on the organisation’s work in general.

Possible ways of consulting the organisation’s constituency Directly to members: Surveys with questionnaires (detailed set of questions) Rounds of talks with farmers (just basic questions) In meetings: In normal periodic meetings (when there exist meetings) In meetings organized especially for consulting members  How can an organisation carry out consultations?

Typical basic steps for a consultation with membership What will be consulted? Who (need to) will be consulted? Clear target group (includes the ‘where’) When it will be done? Timeline and dates. How it will be done? Strategy and methodology. 1. Defining the consultation What Who When How

Typical basic steps for a consultation C onsulting members (according to selected methodology) R egistering results O rdering/ P rocessing the results 2. Consultation work CROP: C onsult members R egister results O rder information P rocess information

Keywords (key ideas) for “Consultations” in FACT AIR Accountable Informed Relevant issue What Who When How CROP: Consult members Register results Order information Process information

FACT Preparatory Workshop Session 3 Participatory Research Gathering and Analysis of Information for Preparing Proposals

Three main purposes of data gathering. To be sure that the proposal to be prepared is based on real facts and information To be able to show that your proposal is based on a solid foundation. To Propose a Good Solution A solution that is based on responding to the relevant facts and reality that you can show that you know.

Participatory research in Farmers’ Organisations The organisation makes the link between Farmers’ knowledge and Experts’ knowledge. Farmers provide information from the reality in the rural area Experts bring information from science, technology, markets, laws, etc.

Participatory research: Steps Step 1: Defining the methodology ( -The organisation links up with experts and with farmers. -Experts give advice Step 2: Data gathering from membership (CROP) Step 3: Data analysis and desk study Step 4: Conclusions and initial definition of a draft proposal (defining ‘what to propose’ and arguments). Step 5: Feedback/validation from members Step 6: Proposal (document) is defined.

Keywords (key ideas) for “Participatory research” in FACT AIR Accountable Informed Relevant issue What Who When How CROP: Consult members Register results Order information Process information KSK to Know and to Show that you Know

FACT Preparatory Workshop Session 4 Writing SMART Proposals

The FACT approach to preparing positions and proposals Positions and proposals are instruments for ‘Uploading problems’ (from farmers to various decision makers) With the purpose of‘Downloading’ solutions (from decision makers to farmers)

Writing proposals: Specific solutions for specific problems SMART S pecific Propose something specific that the organisation wants to see to happen. (What, where, how) M easurable Propose something that can be measured whether it happened or not. (What, when) A chievable Propose something that is feasible achieve and make it explicit. (How, when) R ealistic Propose something that is realistic (possible within particular circumstances) (How, when, who and with what) T ime bound Propose a timeframe for the proposed actions to happen. (What + when)

Keywords (key ideas) for Writing SMART proposals in FACT AIR Accountable Informed Relevant issue What Who When How CROP: Consult members Register results Order information Process information KSK to Know and to Show that you Know SMART Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time bound ‘Uploading’ problems ‘Downloading’ solutions

FACT Preparatory Workshop Session 5 Lobby Mapping & Stakeholders Analysis

“Lobby Mapping” ‘Uploading’ problems ‘Downloading’ solutions Where to upload? The question then is: How to know where to lobby, advocate or present a position or proposal? Lobby mapping: Identify and diagram who decides what, where and when Who else can influence those decisions?

Classifying stakeholders by their Power / Interest in the issue at stake

Keywords (key ideas) for Lobby Mapping and Stakeholders Analysis in FACT AIR Accountable Informed Relevant issue What Who When How CROP: Consult members Register results Order information Process information KSK to Know and to Show that you Know SMART Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time bound RPRP (Us)  (Them) R ight R ight P eople P eople R ight P lace