Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How To Enforce Your U.S. Patent Presented at: Patentgruppen Århus, Denmark Date: October 25, 2011 Presented by: Richard J. Basile Member St. Onge Steward.
Advertisements

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal’s wager
Greg Gardella Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Establishing Foreign Law Source: Gerhard Dannemann: Establishing Foreign Law in a German Court, German Law Archive,
Environmental Risk Management Teaching material and methods Yiannis Xenidis, Lecturer Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle.
FIN 685: Risk Management Topic 5: Simulation Larry Schrenk, Instructor.
Jeffrey W. Puryear WOMACK, LANDIS, PHELPS & McNEILL.
ADR v Litigation in IPR Disputes One Judge’s Perspective.
©2002 Marger Johnson & McCollom PC, All Rights Reserved. Intellectual Property Presentation for 2002 High Technology Protection Summit Presented by Alexander.
Written Patent Discovery  Decline of notice pleading and its impact on patent litigation  Rule 26, FRCP and written patent discovery  Local Patent Rules.
Patent Litigaton Strategies in Israel Reuven Behar, partner Fischer Behar Chen & Co.
The U.S. Legal System and Alternative Dispute Resolution
SMALL CLAIMS COURT. Small Claims Court  Sometimes referred to as “the people’s court”  Informal and inexpensive way for settling disputes  Claims of.
SBZL IP LAW FIRM We bring IP Patent & Trademark Protection in CHINA.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Statistics
1 Agenda for 36th Class Admin – Handouts – Review class – Tuesday 5/ :15 I will stay in the room until at least noon to answer questions – Last.
1Decision Trees 1 ENMA 6010: Decision Trees 1 Based on examples from: Decision Trees – A Primer for Decision-Making Professionals by Rafael Olivas ©2010.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
Civil litigation begins with pleadings: formal papers filed with the court by the plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff - the person bringing the lawsuit.
Our Divided Patent System John R. Allison University of Texas McCombs School of Business Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School David L. Schwartz Northwestern.
Probability Rules!. ● Probability relates short-term results to long-term results ● An example  A short term result – what is the chance of getting a.
SIMULATION USING CRYSTAL BALL. WHAT CRYSTAL BALL DOES? Crystal ball extends the forecasting capabilities of spreadsheet model and provide the information.
1. 2 There is only one good kind of legal dispute -- The one that is prevented!
The Paralegal Professional Chapter Six The Court System.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Ch. 4-1 THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil.
Are civil trials vanishing? Judge Beth M. Andrus American Judges Association October 2015.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
Chapter 1: Legal Ethics 1. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use.
Basics of Patent Infringement Litigation UC Berkeley Patent Innovation and Strategy Dr. Tal Lavian November 24, 2008.
Intellectual property research institute of australia IP Enforcement in Australia What’s Actually Happening in the Courts? Presentation by: Kim Weatherall.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.
Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.
1 Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases From notes by Steve Baron © Ed Lamoureux/Steve Baron.
What is Probability?. The Mathematics of Chance How many possible outcomes are there with a single 6-sided die? What are your “chances” of rolling a 6?
Fri., Oct. 17. amendment 15(a) Amendments Before Trial. (1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
The word science comes from the Latin "scientia," meaning knowledge. Scientific Theories are not "tentative ideas" or "hunches". The word "theory" is often.
Presented to the Association of Corporate Counsel, Ontario Chapter By: Jason H. Wilson and Paul J. Loh Moderator: Sanjeev Dhawan May 21, 2015.
Print your Name Print your Street Address Print your City, State, and Zip Code Self-Represented Print Courthouse Street Address Print Courthouse City,
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues Hosted by: Update on U.S. Patent Legislation.
Simulation Chapter 16 of Quantitative Methods for Business, by Anderson, Sweeney and Williams Read sections 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, and Appendix 16.1.
Bernoulli Trials, Geometric and Binomial Probability models.
1 Agenda for 35th Class Review –Supp J –Res Judicata Collateral Estoppel Review Class –2011 exam –Questions you bring Other exams to look at –2000 multiple.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Decision Analysis.
Probability Michael J. Watts
Understanding Business and Personal Law The Court System Chapter 4 The Court System What You’ll Learn How disputes can be settled without the courts.
Chief Judge Intellectual Property High Court Ryuichi Shitara.
1 October 2012 CSAIO 13, The Hague The dispute settlement system (pre-litigation and litigation) at EIB Ms. Dalila Bundy Dr. Patrick Vanhoudt Staff Representatives.
The Paralegal Professional Chapter Six The Court System and Alternate Dispute Resolution.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Understanding Randomness.
1 Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 9 Understanding Randomness.
Unit The Informed Citizen.  The Canadian courts are the judicial branch of government.  There are three branches of government : executive, legislative.
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 8-1 Making Decisions 8.
Resolving Health Care Disputes
© 2006 Brett J. Trout Patent Reform Act of 2005 © 2006 Brett J. Trout
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute
Hon. Victor B. Kenton (Ret.)
Strengths of ADR Much less formal- is not bound by strict rules of evidence and procedure. This makes it less intimidating and cheaper (do not have to.
Judicial, Administrative, Alternative, and Online Dispute Resolution
Motion to Transfer Success Rates Before and After TC Heartland
Resolving Health Care Disputes
THE BEST DEFENSE CAN BE A GREAT OFFENSE AND SAVE THE EXPENSE OF TRIAL: Develop your game plan now for early disposition as a result of pre-trial motions.
Chapter 11.
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Civil Pretrial Practice
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Presentation transcript:

Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation All rights reserved.

2 Overview  Rational Approach:  Taking emotions out of the equation;  Patent litigation as risk management.  Litigation Risk Analysis:  Decision Trees;  Choosing probabilities.  Other Decision-Making Tools:  Monte Carlo Simulation;  Game Theory.

3 Rational Approach: Taking emotions out of the equation  “Fighting to the death” is a sure way of getting your death wish.  “Never hate your enemies – it clouds your judgment.” – The Godfather  “It’s not personal, it’s strictly business.” – The Godfather

4 Rational Approach: Patent litigation as risk management  Quantum Mechanics of patent litigation.  Although patents are presumed valid, in reality, they are neither valid nor invalid until tried in court.  Collapsing the wavefunction, i.e. going to court.  Litigation as risk management.

5 Constructing a Decision Tree Baby Tree

6 Decision Tree for Patent Litigation

7 Choosing Probabilities  National statistics:  Validity: 65%;  Enforceability: 89%;  Infringement: 65%.  Statistics for your district:  EDT: 88%;  Massachusetts: 34%;  Statistics for your judge.

8 Refining Probabilities  Specific issues impacting on the merits of your case:  Questions of ownership;  Questions of inequitable conduct;  Willfulness;  Marking;  Latches and/or estoppel;  Other claims, e.g. breach of contract.  Delphi method.

9 Rolling Back the Tree

10 To Settle or Not to Settle

11 To Settle or Not to Settle  When the plaintiff is a NPE.  When the plaintiff is a competitor.  Valuing a patent monopoly.

12 Present Value of Patent Monopoly

13 Common Mistakes  Various outcomes are not statistically independent.  Jury bias.  Law of large numbers.  Catastrophic outcomes.

14 Other Decision-Making Tools  Monte Carlo Simulation  Game Theory

15 Conclusion Stay rational; Use of formal decision-making tools helps keep emotions at bay; Use of decision tree helps compare certainty of settlement with uncertainty of litigation; You get to play this game once – don’t gamble; Whatever the probability, if the result is unacceptable you cannot take the chance; Trial is an expensive Russian roulette.