1. Motion to Transfer Success Rates Before and After TC Heartland
44%
36%
14%
60%
49%
45%
57%
18%
+5%
+8%
+43%
-42%
Source: Docket Navigator

2. How Do Different Venues Compare?
Section 101 motions
Summary judgment
Motions to stay pending IPR
Time to trial, and length of trial

3. Section 101 Success Rates by Jurisdiction
E.D. Tex.: 34%
D. Del: 52%
C.D. Cal.: 61%
N.D. Cal.: 53%

4. Summary Judgment Success Rates by Jurisdiction
E.D. Tex.: 18%
D. Del: 32%
C.D. Cal.: 36%
N.D. Cal.: 34%
Source: Love, Predictably Expensive: A Critical Look at Patent Litigation in the Eastern District of Texas, 20 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1 (2017)

5. Success Rates for Stays Pending IPRs by Jurisdiction
E.D. Tex.: 24% N.D. Cal.: % D. Del.: %
Source: Warriner, Measuring The Success of Motions to Stay Pending IPR (June 6, 2017), Law360

6. Median Time to Trial by Jurisdiction
E.D. Tex.: 637 days
D. Del.: 755 days
C.D. Cal.: 722 days
N.D. Cal.: 822 days
Source: Lex Machina (Cases filed from 1/1/2012 to 12/12/17)

7. Trial Length by Jurisdiction
Jury trials
E.D. Tex.: 6.18 days
D. Del.: 7.96 days
C.D. Cal.: 8.24 days
N.D. Cal.: days
Source: Lemley et al., Rush to Judgment? Trial Length and Outcomes in Patent Cases, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, at 169 (2013)
Data includes trials from 1/1/2000 to 6/30/2011

8. Where Are NPEs Filing After TC Heartland?
Source: Lex Machina
Cases filed by “high-volume” plaintiffs (i.e., parties who file at least 10 patent cases, excluding ANDA, within a 365-day period)