Rob Bartels Research Centre for Integrated Pedagogies at Inholland Professional University Centre of Philosophy for Children Netherlands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning at Lanyon High B Davies. Groups Previously students were seated around the classroom and were not participating well in the lesson. The structure.
Advertisements

a curriculum to support ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP
Trustworthy: to have belief or confidence in the honesty, goodness, skill or safety of a person, organization or thing.
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
An Introduction to Lifespan Development
Middle Years Programme
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2006 The Middle Years Programme At a Glance.
 AGE Different ages have different needs, competences, and cognitive skills. Steven Pinker – acquisition of language (L1, L2 or Foreign) is guaranteed.
Internship Seminar What will be covered: The internship context
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
2 nd Workshop Day 3 Science Society.  There is not one solution but many solutions in different ways.  We must compromise to accommodate for differences.
Youth-Adult Partnerships
The Training-Learning Process Mala, Jeya, Nesrin, Noura.
What cooperative learning is Students working together to achieve shared goals to maximize their own and each other’s learning, promote positive social.
Towards the ALF 10 Years annalindhfoundation.org.
CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION IN FINLAND
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Mike Gasper and Paul Watling.
A Vision of Powerful Social Studies Teaching and Learning
Teamwork 101.
Children’s Rights from around the Globe Maria Herczog Ph.D. UN CRC Committee member.
Curriculum Planning Building a strong curriculum.
Meaningful Social Studies & Meaningful Learning
Why a foundation curriculum at Manchester Academy? Ease transfer and transition (pupils arrive from 35 different primary schools) Many students arrive.
The Council agreed that under this renewed framework "youth work" is a broad term covering a large scope of activities of a social, cultural, educational.
Three Methods of Philosophical Dialogue: differences and similarities between Nelson's Socratic Method , Lipman's P4C Method, McCall's CoPI Method.
COMPETENCES FOR DEMOCRATIC CULTURE The European Resource Centre on Education for Human Rights, Democratic Citizenship and Intercultural Understanding.
Colorado Families as Faculty Project Families as Faculty: Improving Home-School Communication Beth Schaffner.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
Dialogue Among Young Citizens in a Pluralistic RE Classroom The Norwegian Discussion.
Module 3 Self care - doing it for ourselves Self Care Training.
1 The White Paper on “Intercultural Dialogue” Christian International Organisations at the Council of Europe November 2009 Intercultural Dialogue The Council.
Integration of senior Europeans through fostering of family traditions.
Innovative Schools toolkit Strategic Workshop 3 - Exploring good practice case studies.
Accountable Talk Malden Public Schools. What is Accountable Talk “Accountable talk sharpens students' thinking by reinforcing their ability to use and.
Introduction to the Framework Unit 1 - Getting Ready for the Unit
Impact of transnational exchange experiences on senior volunteers and organisations Senior European Volunteers Exchange Network Final meeting Brussels,
LEADERSHIP Process of influencing others in identifying and working towards a common goal.
LEADERSHIP Leadership What is a leader? Who is a leader? Can I be a leader?
YEAR 1 FOUNDATION RS Philosophy for Children P4C P for C.
PREPARATORY DESK RESEARCH PARTICIPATIVE NETWORKS: ENSIE’s Approach and Case Studies Iasi, July 2015.
Ethical Decision Making and Consumer Directed Care Have You Thought About It? Angie Robinson November 2023.
Pupil talk and critical thinking in science and citizenship.
Conceptual Framework for Social Studies Education John F. vonEschenbach State University of West Georgia.
Learning conversations and listening pedagogy Bridget Egan.
English for Specific Purposes
Competences for Democratic Culture: A new Council of Europe initiative on citizenship education Martyn Barrett University of Surrey, UK.
What is a leadership style? The way a leader leads. What are the different styles? Autocratic Democratic Laissez-Faire.
EWE PROJECT Research in Spain Situation and results.
Guided Reading. The Reading Diet Children working individually, in groups or as a whole class to use and apply their reading skills to complete a range.
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme IB MYP.
Middle Years Programme The unique benefits of the MYP.
Planning for and Attending an Important Meeting Advanced Social Communication High School: Lesson Seven.
The Year of the Curriculum: Life Without Levels The programme consists of a bridging unit and five further units: © Curriculum Foundation1 Bridging Unit.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
C.C.C.P Caribbean Coaching Certification Program.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
“Let us examine this question together my friend, and if you can contradict anything that I say, do so, and I shall be persuaded.” Crito, Plato Socratic.
Interpersonal Skills.
Framework of Reference of Competences for Democratic Culture.
ST MARY’S RC HIGH SCHOOL Communicating with Pupils A Whole School Approach to Improving Access, Participation and Achievement.
Philosophy for children (P4C)
Assessing Young Learners
The Nordic Dialogue Study Circles and Future Workshop as tools for democratic communication Hungary, 28 – 29 November 2016
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
‘Thinking about thinking’
Curriculum and Standards
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Presentation transcript:

Rob Bartels Research Centre for Integrated Pedagogies at Inholland Professional University Centre of Philosophy for Children Netherlands

presentation: 1. previous history of the project 2. clarification of concepts 3. first results 4. next steps 2

philosophy for democracy 1. previous history 3

previous history of the project  project: ‘teachers philosophize’  result: the book ‘Children learn to philosophize’  a practise based methodology for philosophy with children  a guide for teachers to implement and develop philosophy 4

previous history of the project  new legislation: the advancement of active citizenship is a main task of schools  a chance to implement philosophy with children in this framework 5

philosophy for democracy 1. programme based on the methodology of ‘Children learn to philosophize ‘ 2. pilots in 40 classes 3. research to show that philosophy with children can be a democratic practice which contributes to education for democratic citizenship 6

philosophy for democracy 2. clarification of concepts and assumptions 7

main assumptions  that philosophy with children can be seen as a form of democratic practice,  and that democratic practices in education can contribute to the development of democratic citizenship competencies of children. 8

democracy  The main value of democracy is in the recognition of differences, the individual right to be who we wish to be.  The other values are derived from the minimal conditions required for living together peacefully. Democracy cannot exist without the will and the capability of its citizens to live together in a democratic way: that is democratic citizenship. 9

democratic citizenship  The recognition of difference the recognition of everyone’s right to be who he/she wishes to be, in the knowledge that no one is superior to others: recognition of equality 10

democratic citizenship  We wish and are able to communicate about our differences, in which we not only have the ability to debate and discuss, but also to dialogue, to attempt to understand the thinking and actions of others. 11

democratic citizenship  We can cope with social conflicts  We can cope with social conflicts; reasonability in this framework is a value as well as a skill. We can use all sorts of democratic communication, as well as forms of democratic decision-making. 12

democratic citizenship  Judiciousness is a responsibility of the citizen, and so it is a necessary skill. Therefore we learn to think critically and analytically, we learn to form our opinion, and to reason. 13

democratic citizenship  Democratic citizenship can only be practised by autonomous people. In principle, every citizen is considered to be able to develop an individual identity. 14

philosophy with children a democratic practice  Almost all aspects of the democratic way of life reveal themselves 15

philosophy with children a democratic practice  the development of thinking abilities and judiciousness,  the development of autonomous thinking,  children learn to cope with differences of opinion  the development of dialogue  and all of this takes place in a setting where all are considered equal. 16

philosophy for democracy 3. the first results of the research 17

philosophy for democracy the first phase three instruments:  a questionnaire for the teachers  a short questionnaire for children from group 3 to 8 (6 to 9 years old)  class observations and interviews with eight teachers and their classes  24 teachers  400 children 18

philosophy with children is a democratic practice!  Although the teacher is the dominant source of questions  we also observe considerable influence from the children.  At a young age, they already have dialogical attitude and skills, such as asking one another questions, listening to one another,  and these attitudes and skills develop more and more as they get older. 19

philosophy with children is a democratic practice!  Everyone has equal opportunities to participate.  The involvement of children in the enquiries is high.  Thinking about what is being said  and listening to what others say showed high scores from young to old. 20

philosophy with children is a democratic practice!  The opinions expressed are of the children themselves,  their contribution to the enquiry is authentic  and they contribute independently from one another. 21

philosophy with children is a democratic practice!  Children give reasons for their opinions,  and they do so more and more spontaneously as they get older.  It is hard to think of new reasons, when you have to defend your point of view. It is even annoying when someone else disagrees with you.  Obviously that does not feel comfortable, but in their reactions that discomfort - as children get older – is less and less observable. 22

philosophy for democracy 4. next steps 23

philosophy for democracy next steps  discussion with the participant teachers about the clarification of concepts  what learning processes occur and how can results from these lessons be defined and measured in terms of growth in democratic values, insights and sensibilities? 24

15 November 2007 ©rob bartels ; 25