Alaska CCCP Vision & Mission Vision: A Cancer Free Alaska Mission: Working Together for a Cancer Free Alaska A CANCER FREE ALASKA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Success in Wyomings Efforts Surrounding Comprehensive Cancer Control Linda Chasson, MS, Administrator Preventive Health & Safety Division Wyoming.
Advertisements

2004 Camden County Cancer Capacity and Needs Assessment: The Next Steps Jean F. Mouch, MD, MPH Camden County Coalition Coordinator April 6, 2005.
Healthier Together April 7, Agenda Welcome & Introductions (20 minutes) Celebrate Successes – Video (5 minutes) Healthier Together Community Health.
1 Comprehensive Cancer Control In Action. What to expect today? Provide state-level forum for networking & sharing your org’s current survivorship initiatives.
Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African AmericansIn Lansing Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African Americans In Lansing Costellia Talley, PhD,
Title Patient Patient Advisory CouncilAdvisory Council Patient Advisory Council.
ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE Developing the Maine Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan
Louisiana Cancer Control Partnership Evaluation of State Partners Donna L. Williams, MS, MPH And Melody M. Robinson, MPH.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR ALASKA NATIVES AND AMERICAN INDIANS 33.
Welcome to the Montana Cancer Control Coalition (MTCCC)
The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP): Current Progress and Future Action Temeika L. Fairley, Epidemiologist Comprehensive Cancer Control.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR ALASKA NATIVES AND AMERICAN INDIANS 33.
Program Objectives and Evaluation Using Healthy Campus 2010: Making It Happen and Logic Models Jim Grizzell, MBA, MA, CHES, F-ACHA.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Promoting Parent Engagement in School Health. 2 1.Understand the importance of adolescent and school health. 2.Define parent engagement and understand.
American Chiropractic Association Just Imagine...
Guide to Cancer Survivorship and Resources for Cancer Patients.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
FORCE XRAY PROGRAM Evaluating Reports on Breast Cancer in the Media.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
By Laura Harrod. VFC vaccines supplied by VFC can be given only to: Children aged 18 years and younger (prior to the 19 th birthday) who: Are on Medicaid,
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
 You can participate if :  You have cancer, including breast, ovarian, and other cancers, or  Your family members have cancer including breast, ovarian,
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR ALASKA NATIVES AND AMERICAN INDIANS 33.
Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Introduction to the Medical Home Part 2 How does a Practice adopt.
“Working Together, Reducing Cancer, Saving Lives”
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
Blending the Theoretical and the Empirical in Evaluation Science: A Case Example from Cancer Control/Prevention and a General Discussion Ross Conner University.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
American Cancer Society Prostate Cancer Activities 2007 African American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 28, 2007 Washington, D.C.
Families Matter: A CCFC approach to helping ACT recipients achieve their recovery-oriented goals Thomas Jewell, PhD Pascale Jean-Noel, LMSW October 23,
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
CPCRN Collaboration with CDC Office of Colorectal Cancer Programs Roshan Bastani and Matt Kreuter CPCRN Meeting Boston, Nov 1-2, 2007.
Update EPIDEMIOLOGY AND APPLIED RESEARCH BRANCH Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Mary C. White, Sc.D. National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE YEAR AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND YEAR ACS INSURANCE.
Networking Now! Coordinated Chronic Disease Prevention Learning Community July 9, 2012.
Nancy L. Weaver, PhD, MPH Department of Community Health School of Public Health Saint Louis University 16 July 2010 LOGIC MODEL FUNDAMENTALS.
Robin A. Cohen, PhD National Center for Health Statistics National Conference on Health Statistics August 6, 2012 Analytic Uses of National Health Interview.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
10/27/ Welcome to Your Parent School Support Committee PSSC.
Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund Public Health Grant at Johns Hopkins New Pathways for Care: A Model for Delivering Prostate Cancer Screening to Men.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE YEAR AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND YEAR DATA TYPE OF.
Welcome and thanks for coming! 1 Created By C. Standerwick Patient Participation Group Lower Clapton Group Practice.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR ALASKA NATIVES AND AMERICAN INDIANS 33.
Evaluation Tools and Models Northern Plains CCC Program Comprehensive Cancer Control 2008 Annual Grantee Meetings May 14th, 2008 Atlanta, GA.
Community Change By: Emily Alpers, Shirley Iler, Barbara Lentz, & Sharon Lumbert.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR ALASKA NATIVES AND AMERICAN INDIANS 12.
Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership PGCert Primary May 2014.
Incorporating Multiple Evidence Sources for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Policies and Practices J. Jackson-Thompson, Gentry White, Missouri Cancer Registry,
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Reducing Cancer Disparities in Maryland: from Observations to Solutions Jean G. Ford, M.D. Director, Community-based Research Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive.
PAIN CONTROL AMONG CANCER SURVIVORS IN OHIO 2010 Robert W. Indian, Chief Mary Lynn, Researcher Debbie Wallace, Administrative Assistant Comprehensive Cancer.
Partnership Satisfaction: Three Year Comparison A CANCER FREE ALASKA.
Community Change By: Emily Alpers, Shirley Iler, Barbara Lentz, & Sharon Lumbert.
CT CANCER PLAN Co-chairs Committee Presentation February 27, 2013.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR ALASKA NATIVES AND AMERICAN INDIANS 33.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1: Access to Quality Health Services Progress Review June 15, 2006.
REVIEW OF NEW DATA FROM THE YEAR AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY ON RATES OF INSURANCE AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND YEAR ACS INSURANCE.
Strategic Planning: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Strategic Planning Committee Open Forum.
Draft, Washington Prediabetes Advocacy Plan.
Evidence-Based Practice Working Group Focus Group Guide NCCCP Experiences with Using/Implementing the Template for Community Outreach (TCO) Brenda Adjei,
Grant Program Susan G. Komen Iowa Affiliate.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
Need to submit travel reimbursement forms?
Celebrating 20 Years of Collaborating to Conquer Cancer
Henry Ford’s Patient and Family Advisor Approach
The Partnership for a Healthy Delaware County
NAACCR/IACR Annual Conference, June 2019
Presentation transcript:

Alaska CCCP Vision & Mission Vision: A Cancer Free Alaska Mission: Working Together for a Cancer Free Alaska A CANCER FREE ALASKA

Evaluation Planning: We focus evaluation on three components 1. Plan Evaluation Outcomes 2. Partnership Evaluation Meeting Satisfaction Participation/Attendance 3. Committee Evaluation Activities

For each component, we have three types of evaluation Three types of evaluation: 1. Process – Monitoring and documenting program activities 2. Impact – Documenting the short-term results of program activities 3. Outcome – Documenting and measuring progress toward reaching goals

Evaluation Model - Logic Processes Impact Outcomes If processes occur as planned, then the impact of program activities will be positive and progress will be made toward achieving outcomes.

Using the evaluation model Processes Advisory committee Meetings suggest Survivorship Issues *Conference *Needs Assessment *Treatment Summaries Impact Input obtained to guide decisions about how to …. Evidence Based Outcomes Programs developed that meet needs of Alaskans and make progress toward reducing the burden of cancer – Increased Quality of Life, Decreased Health Disparity.

Partnership Evaluation Process - Observation Meeting is carried out as planned Agenda sent out and received Logistics are as planned Agenda is covered as planned during the meeting Impact – Survey Quantitative Attendance and representation Will they attend committee meetings in the future? Qualitative Was the meeting a good use of time? Are the ‘right’ people at the table ?

Committee/Activity Evaluation Survivorship Committee: Survivorship Conference Survivor Snapshot Welcome to the Survivorship Conference. Please take a moment to tell us about yourself. 1. My relationship to cancer: (Please check all that apply):  Survivor  Relative of Survivor  Caregiver  Provider  Support Group Member  Other If you are a survivor, where was your primary site(s): Diagnosis Date: Gender: Age: Ethnicity/Cultural Heritage: Zip Code: 2. My health care access and insurance coverage is (Please check all that apply):  Private Insurance  Medicare  Medicaid  Alaska Native/American Indian  Military  Veteran  Uninsured  Other: 3. My health priority today: 4. May we contact you?  Yes  No Name: Phone and/or Thank you for taking the time to complete this information, which offers the American Cancer Society and conference organizers a snapshot of the audience we are currently reaching, identify others we may be missing and help us to assess survivor needs.

Survivorship Conference Evaluation: Quantitative: The conference met my expectations.□ YES □ NO Comments: _______________________________ The information presented was relevant to my needs and experience. Pain and Neuropathy□ YES □ NO Comments: _______________________________ Exhibits and Resources□ YES □ NO Comments: _______________________________ Qualitative: Additional comments: What was most valuable to you in attending today’s conference?

Survivorship Conference Evaluation: Thank you!

Plan Evaluation A Report Card on Outcomes Breast Cancer Outcomes: by 2010, increase the percentage of women ages 40+ who have had a mammogram in the previous 2 years to 76%. (Health Alaskans 2010)

Plan Evaluation: Report Card Data Base: BRFSS 2004 Baseline: 67% Alaska Native Women: 67% White Women:67% Data Base: BRFSS 2006 Goal: 76% in 2010 Alaska Native Women: 81% White Women:72%

Next Steps… Development of Report Card Complete Needs Assessment Repeat Satisfaction Survey of Partnership

Resources Attend Evidence Based Public Health – NACDD and Prevention Research Center at St. Louis University. Websites: CDC – NCCCP Web Forum