1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
Advertisements

USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
A Guide to Student Support for 2009/10. What’s in this presentation? The Student Support available The Application Process The Assessment Procedure Loan.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation Updates June 2013.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
Verification Kentucky Department of Education September 2012.
Adjustment & COCP Barbara Kwok Licensing Operations Specialist.
© 2014 Public Health Institute PROPOSAL WRITING.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Supplemental Analysis and Timeline.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010.
First 5 LA Invoicing & Budget Modification Workshop OHCD Contractors FY
Workshop on irregularities EEA and Norway Grants Financial aspects related to the irregularities Herdis Bjornevik Svendsen Financial Controller.
Xoserve sense checks & validation Reasonable Endeavours Claims.
COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION Maturity Assessment and implementation recommendation for ITIL V3, COBIT 5 and KING III Chapter 5 RAF /2015/00016 Date: 04.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO LINZ STANDARD AND GUIDELINE FOR ACQUISITON OF LAND UNDER THE PUBLIC WORKS ACT.
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
Shipperless & Unregistered Workgroup Monday 1 st July 2013.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Proposed Agreement For Identification And Administration Of Unregistered Sites Chris Warner Network Code Manager.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
UP presentation Transmission wstream Jan 08 1 user pays services implementation January 2008.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Title V, Preliminary Completeness Review. What do I need to do?  I need to find out if the application contains the required information.  Initial Title.
Accounting & Financial Analysis 111 Lecture 8 Source Documents, Day accounts/Specialised Journals, Debtors & Creditors Subsidiary Ledgers.
Project Nexus Workgroup – Invoicing 11 th August 2014.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Implementation of Trades and Transfers National Grid NTS 5 th June 2008.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
Project Nexus Workgroup Extension of Modification 0434 to permit retrospective updates pre-dating Project Nexus Go Live Date 9 th September 2014.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
1 New proposal extending the services created by Modification 279 historic asset and read data Modification 279 created an annual report (on request at.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Royal Mail Group: Scheme for Growth Pilot A simple guide.
U.S. General Services Administration Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration GSA Federal Acquisition Service Industry Webinar.
DN Interruption Reform Transmission Workstream Mark Freeman 5 th April 2007.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION Maturity Assessment and implementation recommendation for ITIL V3, COBIT 5 and KING III Chapter 5 RAF /2015/00016 Date:
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
Incentives 26 September 2018.
Part B Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Modification Proposal 0474: Inclusion of the guidelines relating to the “Customer Settlement Error Claims Process” within UNC governance.
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
Project Nexus Workgroup
DN Interruption Phase II
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Correction to No Load Cost - “and” vs “or”
Scheme for Growth Pilot
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document

2 Agenda –Background –UNC Modification What it is proposed to cover What it is not proposed to cover –Eligibility Criteria –Treatment Customer Settlement Error Claims Process

3 In the decision letter where Ofgem approved the Modification they indicated that the process would benefit from some clarity / development to assist Users in submitting Claim Requests A Guidelines document is proposed to provide support to Users on the process, specifically to: –Commentary on the information required –Understanding of the treatment of such Claim Requests by Transporters Guidelines document is not intended to further develop or revisit UNC Modification 429 Background

4 In order to enact the Guidelines document a UNC Modification has been raised –Guidelines proposed to be governed by UNCC –Within the Guidelines a sample templates is proposed Not proposed that this is covered within UNCC Proposed that this is held on Extranet – change managed through Xoserve Operational Forum –Modification will develop the Guidelines UNC Modification

5 Guidelines document is not intended to further develop or revisit UNC Modification 429 Proposed Structure of the Guidelines Document –Initial Assessment by User / Eligibility Criteria –Collation of Data by User / Assessment by the Transporter Guidelines

6 Period of Adjustment under UNC Modification 429 Timelines

7 Eligibility Criteria defined in the Modification –Materiality of Claim This value must be a credit or debit exceeding £50,000. This Claim must relate to an individual User identity (i.e. User Short Code) and the User should be applicable for the whole Claim period. This Claim must relate to the period between Code Cut Off Date – 1 day of formula year t-6 –The value of User to Customer invoicing is not relevant in this process. –Demonstrable Customer Claim - User must be able to demonstrate a claim from the customer for the period and the customer’s assessment of the materiality. The information provided in support of the Claim must include a statement from the Customer verifying that they have submitted a claim for the period in question, and the materiality of such claim. The period of the consumer claim should match that of the User’s Claim. Where the consumer’s claim pre-dates the User’s Claim, i.e. because the User’s Claim includes the earliest date that such Claims may be made, an assessment of the materiality of the consumer’s claim within the relevant period must be provided. The order of magnitude of the User Claim must approximate to that of the consumer claim. –Valid Claim - The claim must be an otherwise valid invoice adjustment request as envisaged in the UNC but the Code Cut Off Date prevents such invoice challenge being actioned by the Transporters. The User must provide a written statement accompanying the claim that sets out the nature of the Claim such that the Transporter is able to assess this on this basis alone and ensure that the type of request would be accepted had this been submitted prior to the Code Cut Off Date. If this can not be demonstrated by the User the Claim should not be submitted. Initial Assessment by User / Eligibility Criteria

8 Legal Text sets out the data required: –Where a User wishes to make a claim …, the following process shall be followed: –(a) the User shall submit to the Transporter Agency the following information: –(i) detail in relation to the nature and duration of the error resulting in the adjustment, including copies of the invoices between the Transporters and the User and the User and the consumer (such information to be applicable to the claim, for example at Supply Meter Point level); –(ii) the relevant system files and supporting information (to include workings and methodology); –(iii) the materiality of the claim in terms of volume of gas, including details of the methodology used to calculate such materiality; –(iv) the exact financial impact of the adjustment including energy (by reference to the monthly average of the System Average Prices) for the period of the claim and transportation costs (with reference to the Transportation Charges prevailing at the time of the claim); –(v[1]) the dates in respect of which the claim will apply in accordance with paragraph [1] –above; –(vi[2]) evidence of the financial impact relating to the Supply Point or group of Supply Points the subject of the claim including written confirmation that the consumer(s) connected to the Individual Supply Point or group of Supply Points in question agree(s) that:[2] –(a) an adjustment in gas off-taken in the period of time between the Code Cut Off Date and the last Day of Formula Year t-6 should be made; –(b) the materiality of the claim as referred to in paragraph (a)(ii) is correct; and –(c) the dates in relation to which the User’s claim applies are correct; and –(vii[3]) a warranty that no previous claims which are the same in nature and/or are in relation to the same dates as the claim being made by the User have been made;[3] –(b) the Transporters shall consider the claim and communicate to the User its approval or rejection of such within 90 days of receipt of the claim, during which time the Transporter Agency shall be entitled to raise queries in relation to the claim and/or to request further information from the User in respect of its claim; –(c) the Transporters shall be entitled to reject the claim if it is considered that the information provided by the User is so clearly erroneous on its face that it would be unconscionable for the claim to be accepted, in which case the Transporters shall reject the claim and inform the User of the reason(s) for such rejection; –(d) if the Transporters consider that an amount exceeding £1 million (one million) pounds is to be re-paid to any User, the Transporter Agency shall issue notification of such fact to Users and that the amount determined as payable to the User shall be paid within 2 (two) months of approval of the claim. If this can not be demonstrated by the User the Claim should not be submitted. Collation of Data by User

9 In assessing the data provided by the User the Transporter Agency were instructed NOT to: –Verify the assessment by the User of the original invoiced energy and charges position – noting that the Claim may not be at a level that invoices are issued. –Recalculate the revised and requested energy and transportation adjustment values. –Assess the Claim adjustment value does not exceed the original invoiced value, is inclusive or exclusive of all invoiced charges or the User’s assessment of this value. –Undertake any investigation into the veracity of the Claim. –Other than checking that the Supply Meter Point was – for the period of the Claim - in the ownership of the User raising the Customer Settlement Error Request, verify any of the individual base data items used by the User in their recalculation. Assessment by the Transporter

10 Transporter shall assess the data –Transporter shall reject or accept within 90 days –Where Transporter needs further information they shall refer to User representative –There is no maximum number of referrals –Propose that the 90 days is start / stop clock Assessment by the Transporter

11 Example commentary: (ii) the relevant system files and supporting information (to include workings and methodology); –Relevant system files and supporting information related to the adjustment amount –The User must present the information to the Transporter Agency in a format that the Transporter Agency can use to generate the invoice adjustment. –The format of this file is attached as Appendix A. –Where the User has not provided this format or it is incomplete this shall be referred back to the User. –The User must provide sufficient information to the Transporter Agency such that they may provide the Supporting Information to any other User who receives the counter credit or debit through the Neutrality mechanism. The relevant format for this Ad Hoc Invoice Supporting Information is contained within the UK Link Manual. –Where the User has not provided this format or it is incomplete this shall be referred back to the User. Assessment by the Transporter

12 Example template: Assessment by the Transporter

13 Example template: Assessment by the Transporter

14 Conclude drafting of Guidelines Document Circulate to Workgroup considering the UNC Modification Develop Guidelines document Implement Next Steps