Prospects for Future Kaon Physics at Fermilab Presentation to the Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee R. Tschirhart March 28 th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Advertisements

June 9, Tetsuro Sekiguchi, KEK BNL-E949 Collaboration The E949 experiment The analysis The results Conclusions BNL, FNAL, UNM, Stony Brook Univ.
8/16/2004ICHEP2004, Beijing Rare Kaon Decay Results From E949 At BNL: K +     Shaomin CHEN TRIUMF, Canada.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
US-Japan and the KTeV Research Program at Fermilab R. Tschirhart US-Japan 30th Anniversary Symposium Kona, Hawaii October 20 th 2010.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
ORKA: The Golden Kaon Experiment Elizabeth Worcester (BNL) for the ORKA collaboration May 1, 2013 Photo: Life of Sea blogspot.
The CP-violation experiments NA48 at CERN Manfred Jeitler Institute of High Energy Physics of the Austrian Academy of Sciences RECFA meeting Innsbruck,
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 17, 2011.
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
11 Primakoff Experiments with EIC A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC For the PrimEx Collaboration Outline  Physics motivation:  The.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.
American Neutrino Strategy: Consequences of P5 Report Jim Strait, LBNE Project Director NuFact August 2014.
1 Charged Kaons at the Main-Injector Measuring |V td | with K +   + Peter Cooper, Fermilab March 26th, 2003 P5 Review. I.Experimental Technique. II.Activities.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
POLENKEVICH IRINA (JINR, DUBNA) ON BEHALF OF THE NA62 COLLABORATION XXI INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY (QFTHEP'2013)
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
New Developments of Flavor Physics Kyoto University H. Nanjo for E391a and K O TO collaboration.
Ю.Г. Куденко 1 Редкие распады каонов Дубна, 12 мая 2004 Вторые Марковские чтения Дубна-Москва, мая 2004 г. Институт ядерных исследований РАН CKM.
1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David.
An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012.
June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Strategy to reduce uncertainty on a  to < 0.25 ppm David Hertzog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign n Present data.
Project-X Physics Opportunities R. Tschirhart Fermilab March 18 th, 2010.
Working Group 3 Summary: V td, V ts, and Friends Jeffrey Berryhill Laurent Lellouch Mikolaj Misiak Christoph Paus CKM Workshop, UCSD March 18, 2005 K BsBs.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Mu2e, August 15, 2007 E Prebys 1 The Steering Group and mu2e Eric Prebys.
Measurement of K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS,KEK. Why K L →    ? Flavor Changing Neutral Current Br(K L   o  ) = 6  1 ・ Im(V td V ts ) 2 X 2 (x.
Overview of the KOPIO Detector 2005 RHIC & AGS Users ’ Meeting Brookhaven National Laboratory June 20, 2005 David E. Jaffe.
Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US Andreas Jansson Fermilab.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia Seeking New Physics with Rare Decays Early Adventures at TRIUMF and Future Prospects JMP Retirement Symposium.
Proton Improvement Plan: View from the Directorate (and the DOE) Stuart Henderson PIP Meeting Jan 3, 2012.
Alain Blondel -- After the ISS -- What did ISS achieve? 1. Established a « baseline » for the accelerator study 2. Rejuvenated simulation and study of.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
High Rate Tracking Test Beam Area David Christian & Richard Coleman.
Augusto Ceccucci NA62 Collaboration Meeting Liverpool, UK, August 27, 2013.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia APS May 3, 2011.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO JPS RHIC symposium, Chuo Univ., Tokyo Hadron Production at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration.
September 27, Proposal to Measure the Rare Decay K     at the CERN SPS CERN, Dubna, Ferrara, Florence, Frascati, Mainz, Merced,
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November
K. Long, R. Roser, 23 July 2014 Report from the Neutrino Summit.
Energy Frontier: Higgs Boson Physics at Hadron Colliders Sally Dawson (BNL), Andrei Gritsan (Johns Hopkins), Rick Van Kooten (Indiana), Heather Logan (Carleton),
1 Intensity Frontier Instrumentation R.Tschirhart, S. Kettell Fermilab.
LARP Accelerator Systems D. Rice, J. Rosenzweig, M. White LARP 2009 review.
Jayakar Thangaraj Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011 PROTOPLASMA: Proton-driven wakefield experiment at Fermilab.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
The η Rare Decays in Hall D
ATLAS Upgrade Program Sarah Demers, US ATLAS Fellow with BNL
Future Flavor Physics At Fermilab?
Kickoff close-out Joerg Jaeckel, Mike Lamont, Claude Vallée.
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
L. Littenberg - BNL K-Rare Decays Frascati - 27 May 05
KEK, 阪大RCNPA, 阪大理B, 京大理C, 原研先端研D,
The future of the E391a experiment
Presentation transcript:

Prospects for Future Kaon Physics at Fermilab Presentation to the Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee R. Tschirhart March 28 th, 2008

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Discussion Today Physics case. Project-X Workshops: Nov 2007, Jan person mailing list of interested parties, about 50 people actively participated workshops. New experimental ideas that emerged at the workshops. Next steps.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC

The Data has led us to a World of Minimal Flavor Violation… G. Isidori, LP-2007

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Minimal Flavor Violation limits New Physics enhancements to less than x2. High premium on rock-solid SM predictions Bobeth et, al. Nucl.Phys. B726 (2005) C, hep-ph/

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC KK Uniqueness: Theoretical error <2% for neutral, <4% charged modes motivate 1000-event experiments--- conceivable with Project-X! Powerful probe of Minimum Flavor Violation where enhancements are less than x2-x3 MFV constraint Standard Model

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Project-X: A blow-torch of protons...all the time! Moving toward full approval. Per year (charged) 250 (charged) 200 (charged)

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Charged Mode, Where we are at Today BNL program has established the process. The CERN NA48 program evolves step-by-step down the sensitivity ladder. Next generation concepts and designs developed by R&D for the Fermilab CKM experiment. The now approved CERN NA62 experiment marches toward a 100 event measurement early next decade Measurement of the K +   branching ratio. (March 2008) Phys.Rev.D77:052003,2008, FERMILAB-PUB CD-E

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC New Charged Mode Ideas Discussed at this Workshop Exploit Project-X proton intensities to develop a next-generation stopped K+ experiment built from modern detector technology. Examples include ultra-low mass ILC trackers in high (>3T) solenoidal tracking volumes events conceivable with next generation stopped expt driven by Project-X. BNL E787/E949 Detector Ultra-low-mass TPC tracking technology developed by the LCTPC collaboration. (photos courtesy of Cornell)

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Charged Mode, Where Fermilab and Project-X could go… In-flight experiment driven by the Main Injector or Tevatron: Follow-up the CERN NA62 with a high-energy separated K + beam. 200-events/year plausible based on the NA62 and CKM designs. Does not require Project-X but would compete directly for Main Injector and/or Tevatron protons. Next-generation stopped kaon experiment based on the demosntrated BNL-E787 technique upgraded with modern detector technology. About 40-events/year achievable with a 20 kW 8 GeV beam, 250-events/year plausible with a 200 kW 8 GeV beam. Both options have an existing solid basis for design and costing, the stopped technique has a demonstrated feasibility.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Neutral Mode: “Nothing-in, nothing out” JPARC approach emphasizes high acceptance for the two decay photons while vetoing everything else: A hermetic “bottle” approach. The original KOPIO concept measures the kaon momentum and photon direction…Good! But costs detector acceptance and requires a large beam to compensate in flux.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Challenges of the KOPIO Design

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Challenges of the KOPIO Design

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Intensity Dependence of the KOPIO Design The KOPIO design is instantaneous rate-limited, primarily due to the large aperture of the neutral beam. The sensitivity could be increased by improved detector resolutions. But the KOPIO design is already not a cheap experiment, large area of detectors, many constraints. Could the potentially huge intensity increases of Project-X qualitatively change the picture? 4-year Sensitivity with Booster Intensity relative to nominal 20kW Operating point is within 20% of maximum yield.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Improved Rate Performance of a “Pencil Beam” TOF Experiment. Booster Power (20 kW): 30 equivalent events per year Project-X (200 kW): 300 equivalent events per year 200 kW operating point has robust rate performance which can be scaled to much higher beam power. Experiment designed with a pencil beam has substantially lower technical risk and likely lower cost. Project-X Events/year 200 kW

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Neutral Mode, Where Fermilab and Project-X Could go… The very high 8-GeV proton flux from Project-X permits an evolution of the KOPIO detector concept with a small solid angle “pencil” neutral kaon beam which recovers the hermetic bottle veto coverage, increases the detector acceptance, and reduces risk. Such an experiment can start at the Booster with sensitivity of about Standard Model events per year. This detector can be designed with Project-X in mind, which would follow with a precision measurement of about 300 events/year. A next-generation TOF-based experiment has a solid basis for design and costing.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC 8 GeV Facility Vision: Common target and shared infrastructure. 8 GeV Beam High Power 8 GeV proton beam Neutral beam Charged Beam The large targeting angle required for the low energy neutral beam allows consideration of a simultaneous charged forward beam! First look at the layout is encouraging. Big payoff in beam and infrastructure economy. Coleman.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Kaon Experiments Staging Concepts Design

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC The Disney Summary Slide… There was work at both Workshops! The Physics case for 1000-event K  experiments is stronger than ever, particularly with the conundrum of Minimum Flavor Violation. These are classic measurements which will stand the test of time. Many direct and associated compelling physics measurements exist at each step to the 1000-event goal. Concepts for 1000-event experiments have been developed and appear plausible. It didn’t have to come out this way. Interesting facility concepts are beginning to emerge. Many opportunities for collaboration here.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Realities… The timescale for Project-X will be long at best. Experiments driven by 8- GeV beam will have correspondingly long timescales to reach 1000-event sensitivity. In the interim there will likely be competition for beam power. No experimental facility or local collaboration at Fermilab now to build from. Facilities: $50M. Neutral Expt: $60M, Charged Expt: $40M, (FY08). In limited funding scenarios progress will be slow. Will it be sub-critical??

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC The Path Forward The lesson of rare-decays is that success requires a campaign. This was true for KTeV, the BNL program, and is now true for the European and Japanese programs. Minimal buy-in from the Laboratory to initiate a campaign: Design effort on infrastructure for an experimental facility that can be driven by 8 GeV beam power as it evolves at the laboratory. Specifically: Buildings, beamlines, target, and beam conditioning. Support collaboration with the European and Japanese programs to create an environment for future investments at Fermilab.

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC Spare Slides

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC AGS Test Beam Results: Microbunch Width 93 MHz cavity at 22 kV gave  = 240 ps. Microbunch time, in ns 93 MHz cavity at 22 kV gave  = 217 ps. Microbunch time, in ns Data Simulation Data

March 28th 2008 Fermilab PAC AGS Test Beam Results: Interbunch Extinction 4.5 MHz cavity at 130 kV gave  = 8 (+/- 6) x Microbunch time, in ns Data Simulation 4.5 MHz cavity at 130 kV gave  = 1.7 (+/- 0.9) x DataSimulation Interbunch events Interbunch events