Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results."— Presentation transcript:

1 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results Conclusions

2 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 2 Tevatron at FermiLab 1992-1996: Run I (125 pb -1 ) –Discovered top 2001-2005: Run IIa (2 fb -1 ) –E=1.8 TeV  1.96 TeV –L = 2 x 10 31 cm -2 s -1  1 x 10 32 cm -2 s -1 2005-2008: Run IIb (~10 fb -1 ) Main Injector & Recycler Tevatron Chicago   p source Booster pp p p pp 1.96 TeV CDF DØ

3 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 3 DØ: one of the two major detectors at Tevatron New in Run IIa: –Solenoid –Si + fiber tracker –Preshowers –Forward muon system

4 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 4 DØ as a place to do B physics  (p  p  b  b) = 150  b at 2 TeV (~10 kHz) –Lots of B’s of all kinds (B d, B s,  b, B c, …) Rich B physics program –Cross section measurements –B s mixing –B lifetime –CP violation in B d and B s –Rare decays In many cases Tevatron is complementary to B factories

5 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 5 Triggers Have to go down from 2.5 MHz crossing rate to 50 Hz writing to disk (0.25 MB/event) –Sophisticated 3-level trigger system Most useful triggers for B physics so far: dimuon triggers (simple and unprescaled) –Central (|  | 3.5 GeV –Forward (1 2-2.5 GeV Coming soon (this summer): –L2 track trigger (track match to  /e) –L2 silicon trigger (displaced vertices)

6 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 6 B jet cross section (1) Step 1: Begin with  in jet cross section Unlike most of the other analyses, this one is based on a relatively small data set (3.4 pb -1 )

7 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 7 B jet cross section (2) Step 2: Extract b content via fit to p T rel distribution –Large b mass  high p T rel T   +jet

8 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 8 B jet cross section (3) Step 3: Unfold jet energy resolution (unsmearing) Measured cross section consistent with Run I results (2-3 times higher than predictions) Dominant error due to jet energy scale corrections

9 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 9 J/  data sample Exploit J/    +  – mode Results based on 40 pb -1 collected data (75k J/  ) Calibration not finalized, mass not in good agreement with PDG

10 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 10  c reconstruction Observe  c in  c  J/   Low energy photons visible through   e + e – conversions Cannot (yet?) separate  c1 and  c2 mass peaks

11 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 11 B Zoo We are able to reconstruct exclusive B decays –The first step towards CP violation measurements

12 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 12 B hadrons not produced at B factories Observe B s  J/   and  b  J/   –Can do B physics complementary to e + e – B factories

13 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 13 Inclusive B lifetime Begin with J/  transverse decay length c  J  = L xy M J/  / p T J/  Infer c  B from c  J/  by applying average MC correction c  B = c  J  / F: correction factor = 1.561  0.023(stat)  0.073(sys) ps (PDG : 1.564  0.014) B  J/  X : 17 % Prompt fraction : 83 % Systematic uncertainties: correction factor, fit bias

14 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 14 Charged B lifetime Full reconstruction (B ±  J/  K ± ): no hadronization or momentum uncertainties c  B = L xy M B / p T B = 1.76  0.24(stat) ps (PDG : 1.674  0.018)

15 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 15 B flavor tagging Method 1: soft muon tagging Charge of highest p T muon in the event (excluding those from reconstructed B) gives (opposite-side) b-tag Method 2: jet charge tagging Q=  q i p Ti /  p Ti, count events with |Q|>0.2 Jet chargeSoft muon efficiency55 ±4%8 ±2% dilution21 ±11%64 ±30% D2D2 2.4 ±1.7%3.3 ±1.8% Tagging performance measure:  D 2  = (N right + N wrong) / N all: efficiency D = (N right – N wrong)/(N right + N wrong): dilution

16 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 16 Conclusions Latest Run IIa D0 B physics results –b-jet cross section –B lifetime –Exclusive B decays –Understanding flavor tagging Improvements in the future –Track and silicon triggers –More calibration, data understanding underway Awaiting for large sets of data, lots of Physics ahead !

17 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 17 Summary slide

18 Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 18 Recent B physics results from DØ With the DØ detector upgraded for Run II, our B physics program has started. Our first results based on 40 pb -1 of data include: –B-jet cross section measurement –Observation of B exclusive decays –B lifetime measurements –Understanding of the flavor tagging In the near future, we’ll have our trigger improved, and we are awaiting for large data sets


Download ppt "Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google