Trade in GMOs – influencing policy at the national and international levels Sue Mayer GeneWatch UK www.genewatch.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Life Science Industry Sector and the Challenge of Upstream Engagement. Joyce Tait.
Advertisements

European Economic and Social Committee Brussels 29 June 2011
Case Study On The EU.
GREEN IRELAND. BRANDING FOR FARMING, FOOD AND ECO-TOURISM.
Domestic Import Regulations for GMOs and their Compatibility with WTO Rules: Some Key Issues Heike Baumüller ICTSD Trade and Development Symposium
Violation of the Rights of Nature and Transgenics Elizabeth Bravo.
Andrew Rude Office of Scientific and Technical Affairs Foreign Agricultural Service US Department of Agriculture October 25, 2007 Peanut Genomics and Biotechnology.
➢ The difference between the price paid to coffee farmers and the price paid by consumers (you and me); ➢ The disconnect between the expanding coffee.
Challenges & opportunities in Europe Christopher Graham Chairman, EASA.
THE DEBATE ABOUT GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. WHAT IS GM FOOD? GM food is made with ingredients such as soya or maize, with genes from other plants or animals.
“View of Asynchronous Approvals from the EU” 111 Rosario, 17 September 2012 Beat Späth, Public Affairs Manager, Green Biotechnology, EuropaBio.
Building Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems in Europe and globally – A critical review of the Common Agriculture Policy and proposals for change.
TRADE DISPUTES WITH THE EU: GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS.
Sam Pieters International Relations Unit DG COMP 12/11/2012 Break out session 1: State owned enterprises and competition neutrality.
“Towards a Regional Approach to Biotechnology Policy in Southern Africa “ By Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
Regional Approach to Biosafety for Southern African Countries (RABSAC) Marnus Gouse Department of Agricultural Economics - University of Pretoria / FANRPAN.
By Barbara Dinham. Multinational Corporations  Develop, manufacture, sell pesticides  Influence farmer’s decisions on pest management and agricultural.
Corporations and Pesticides Barbara Dinham 2005 Sienna Nesser.
Genetically modified foods: the stakeholders, the issues, the global context HSCI E137 Mar 23, 2011 Announcements: Monsanto film after class tonight First.
A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg Sam Giraud
INFLUENCE OF CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON NEW FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT.
Chemicals Management in a Transatlantic Perspective Henrik Selin November 10, 2008.
Genetics E.Q.: How much control do humans really have? C.Q.: How can knowledge of genetics change the way we feed the world?
THE TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE AGREEMENT   United States — Certain Country of Origin Labelling Requirements : TBT measure implying the determination.
Non-tariff Barriers BASM530, John Ries. WTO dispute resolution The WTO offers dispute resolution when one member believes another member is violating.
Corporations and Pesticides. Multinational Corporations have Control  1960s and 1970s the pesticide market was a highly profitable business venture,
Agricultural Biotechnology Marshall A. Martin Professor and Associate Head Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University March 2000.
Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES.
Implications for the Environment. Environmental impact of genetically transformed crops Positive or negative.
Financial crisis & reforms, FTA negotiations on financial services Myriam Vander Stichele Senior Researcher SOMO Bangkok, 25 November 2010.
May19,2005 NAPC_TPD by: Mahmoud Babili1 Multilateral trade negotiations and Agricultural policies in the developed economies.
1. POLICY AND ACTIVITY ON GMOs: THE CO-OPERATIVE GROUP (UK) THE EUROCOOP ENVIRONMENT GROUP Duncan Bowdler, Trade Liaison Manager, the Co-operative Group.
GMOs GMOs IOPD IX San Francisco June 16—17, 2006 GMOs: CURRENT STATUS.
Disciplining the use of food safety measures: The impacts of the WTO SPS agreement on developing countries Michael Friis Jensen Researcher, Globalisation.
AGRICULTURE-A PROUD INDUSTRY. AGRICULTURE TODAY Many changes since Native Americans started simple farming 1.9 million farms in the United States-able.
LECTURE GEOG 270 Fall 2007 November 28, 2007 Joe Hannah, PhD Department of Geography University of Washington.
GM crops and the EU livestock industry Are EU GMO rules putting the sector at risk?
Navigating risks for global food security Juerg Trueb, Head of Environmental and Commodity Markets Palm Beach Strategic Forum, 7-8 April 2014 Navigating.
Successful Lobbying in the EU: Challenges and Opportunities Best Practices RA Ralph Kamphöner, Senior Adviser International Trade Zagreb, 19 April 2011.
The environmental (in)coherance of European food policy Adrian Bebb Friends of the Earth Europe September 2006.
Introduction to GMOs: Myths and realities Masami Takeuchi, Ph.D. Food Safety Officer.
Evaluating GM crops and foods in the UK Sue Mayer GeneWatch UK
LECTURE GEOG 270 Fall 2007 November 26, 2007 Joe Hannah, PhD Department of Geography University of Washington.
GM crops in the EU Campaigning opportunities and challenges FoEE and Greenpeace.
SOURCE: European Commission also adopted today three decisions on the placing on the.
The Canadian Seed Trade Association An Update for The Commercial Seed Analysts Association of Canada June 29, 2011.
The case against GM crops Alissa Cook policy officer Soil Association.
EPAs and Access to Markets for Agricultural Products Reneth Mano Dept of Agricultural Economics University of Zimbabwe.
Biotechnology Priorities for South Africa Prof. Diran Makinde AfricaBio Cape Town- 14/15 April 2003.
Foreign Policy & International Trade
POSC 2200 – International Political Economy Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
European Commission DG TRADE 1 EU NEW GMO LEGISLATION Regulation 1829/2003 Regulation 1830/2003 Ottawa – Winnipeg June 2005.
Expectations from LDCs WTO 10 th Ministerial Conference in Nairobi
International Trade Chapter #4.
LEB Slide Set 1 The Legal Environment of International Markets Matti Rudanko.
SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY AGREEMENT OF WTO by AMBROSE CHINEKE (DIRECTOR PLANT QUARANTINE) NIGERIA AGRICULTURAL QUARAMTINE SERVICE.
17 June 2008IOPD XI 2008Chart 1 IOPD XI 2008 Berlin, 17 June 2008 GMO Policies in the EU – Consequences for the International Trade in Oilseeds and Feedstuffs.
Collin Free. Contents About genetically modified organisms Uses of genetically modified organisms Pros of genetically modified organisms Cons of genetically.
Biotech Plants Two Different Visions and their Implications in Global Trading Carlos Moreira “Plants for Life” International PhD Program – 2017 (course.
Cross-National Cooperation and Agreements
Thailand Crop Protection Market is led by Shift of Farmers from Low-value added Crops to High-value added Crops: Ken Research.
2.02 Barriers to International Trade
Glyphosate Market Research Report - Forecast to 2023 Industry Survey, Growth, Competitive Landscape and Forecasts to 2023 PREPARED BY Market Research Future.
Economics of agro-food safety and international market for agro-food products and legislation Antonio Stasi.
Graham Brookes PG Economics Ltd, UK 10 October 2018
Cross-National Cooperation and Agreements
CropLife Canada and the Canadian Seed Trade Association February, 2017
Pharmaceuticals Industry
From Farm Gate to Consumer: A Road Map for Analyzing Competition Issues Arising from Increasing Concentration in Agribusiness PRESENTATION BY R.SHYAM KHEMANI,
Presentation transcript:

Trade in GMOs – influencing policy at the national and international levels Sue Mayer GeneWatch UK

GM crops (million hectares)

GM Crop 2003

Globally traded commodity crops Predominately grown in USA, Argentina and Canada Six companies undertake 90% of GM crop work - Syngenta; Bayer; Du Pont, Monsanto; Dow; BASF Monsanto market around 90% of commercialised GM crops

GM Nation? the public debate 7 key findings: –people are generally uneasy about GM –the more people engage in GM issues, the harder their attitudes and more intense their concerns –there is little support for early commercialisation –there is widespread mistrust of government and multi-national companies

GM Nation? the public debate 7 key findings (cont) –there is a broad desire to know more and for more research to be done –developing countries have special interests –the debate was welcomed and valued Since 1998, this hostility across Europe had been overt and expressed through consumer actions

European public opinion - impacts on trade major food producers/retailers removed GM ingredients from their produce resulted in resourcing/reformulating products e.g oilseed rape from Poland not Canada Ad hoc moratorium on GMO approvals in Europe Improvements to regulations

WTO challenge US, Canada and Argentina made complaints to WTO: –about European moratorium –failure to consider applications under 90/220 and Novel Foods Regulation –6 member states with marketing/import bans Egypt pulled out Many Third Parties

WTO challenge - basis Discrimination on basis of country or origin - are LIKE products Scientific assessment and precautionary principle Transparency Obligations under WTO for DCs to have preferential treatment - Argentina

WTO challenge - why now? Targetted at other countries to stop them having moratoria/import bans etc Domestic pressure from agricultural lobby and vote trading on tax bill Zollick’s zealotry re DCs and GM crops Desire to ‘see off’ the precautionary principle

Vested interests at work WTO challenge was pushed by biotechnology industry and industrial farming interests in the USA Consumer action led to removal of GM products US National Food Processors Association et al now pushing for second challenge to European rules on labelling/traceabillity