Potential Biodiversity and Environmental Impacts of Commercial Willow SRC Production in the UK. Rebecca L. Rowe 1, Nathaniel R. Street 1, Michael E. Hanley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology Universität für Bodenkultur.
Advertisements

Bioenergy-related analysis: Focus on land use aspects
Land use for bioenergy production – assessing the production potentials and the assumptions of EU bioenergy policy Trends and Future of Sustainable Development.
Biomass & soil quality Patricia Bruneau (SNH) with contribution from Willie Towers (MLURI) Soils in Scotland / Soil quality Biomass production impacts.
European wildlife is inextricably linked with agriculture, with 75% of animal and plant species associated with farmland. Conservation of this biodiversity.
Renewable Energy positive and negative impacts on Biodiversity.
ΤΗEOFANIS.A. GEMTOS, SPYROS FOUNTAS, CHRISTOS ΚAVALARIS LABORATORY OF FARM MECHANISATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CROP PRODUCTION AND RURAL ENVIRONMENT,
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
EuroChar : Development of technologies for long-term carbon sequestration Energy AwayDay May 22 nd 2012.
Study on the Cicada Population in the Picnic Area of the University of Cincinnati-Clermont Campus Andrew Stacy Jeff Kirby Cassandra Tartar University of.
SRC willow and Miscanthus Two contrasting regions (SW England and E-Midlands) Existing data & generated new data to fill knowledge gaps 1. GIS-based suitability.
Team Gemstone BioF.U.E.L.S. Furthering the Utilization of Energy from Land and Soil.
Biomass for Biofuel.
Ecosystems – Joining things up in floodplains Cranfield University: Joe Morris, Tim Hess, Peter Leeds-Harrison, Paul Trawick, Helena Posthumus, Quentin.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Short Rotation Forestry Uppsala, Sweden Introduction Species SRWC in Sweden R & D team WP 23.
Ethanol Anthony Mirabile, Katelyn Snyder, John St. Fleur
The Future for Energy Crops. Diverse drivers impact on land use Policy Drivers Climate change Energy security Ecosystem Services Rural livelihoods Food.
Renewable Energy I Passive solar Active solar Large-scale solar thermal Solar photovoltaic – residential, commercial Wind power Biomass.
Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole- farm approach Paper by: R. H. GIBSON, S. PEARCE, R. J. MORRIS, W. O.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Done by: David Joel Loo 3i202 Yong Han Shawn 3i223.
Species Diversity of Beneficial and Pest Insects in Home Gardens Cameron, Rachael, Barney, Puja, Nathaniel James Johnson, Crystal, Christie, John, and.
Tom Gittings 1, George Smith 2, Mark Wilson 1, Laura French 2, Anne Oxbrough 1, Saoirse O’Donoghue 2, Josephine Pithon 1, Vicki O’Donnell 3, Anne-Marie.
Engaging Gypsies and Travellers: Researching need in Devon Presentation by Dr Zoë James & Dr Rebekah Southern 19th April 2007.
Organic agriculture. Preface In order to prevent pests and bacteria from intrusion, pesticides appeared, although it succeeded in curbing the problem,
Native Bees Along Elevation Gradients as Bioindicators of Climate Change Scott Daniels 1, Dave Smith 2, Neil Cobb 3 1. Cesar Chavez High School, Laveen,
Methods We sampled various points on the Annex landscape to determine baseline levels of pH, soil organic matter (SOM), and soil texture. The north turf.
Chapter 3 Key Terms. Biomass Definition: a mass of organisms in an ecosystem: the mass of living organisms within a particular environment, measured in.
MAGHG: Monitoring and Assessment of GHG Emissions and Mitigation Potentials in Agriculture: Focus on GHG Emissions from organic soils Riccardo Biancalani.
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
"A sustainable disease control strategy as pathogen pressures on SRC willow increase, due to climate change and larger areas of planting." Alistair R.
UNESCO Heritage Site Group E. UNESCO Heritage Sites A UNESCO World Heritage Site is a place that is listed by the UNESCO as of special cultural or physical.
Organic agriculture – a option for mitigation and adaptation Urs Niggli.
Coppice Short-Rotation Woody Crops Production Systems Introduction Advantages of Using Woody Crops for Bioenergy Energy Conversion of Woody Biomass Provide.
What have we learned from 50-year large scale field study on the biodiversity in an agricultural landscape? Krzysztof Kujawa, Jerzy Karg Institute for.
Rural Development Plan for England (RDPE) – improving the environment through agri-environment Rosie Simpson, Natural England.
1 Bio-energy cropping systems Agro-environmental issues Madrid, 9/10 February 2006.
Regeneration of Natural Pasture in Enclosures for Parthenium Weed Management in the Rangeland of Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia B Y Lisanework.
Conservation Describe the management of grassland and woodland habitats to maintain or increase biodiversity, as illustrated by mowing, grazing, scrub.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
Evaluating the UK policy framework for Bio-energy R. Slade (*), C. Panoutsou and A. Bauen The policy context The UK energy system is evolving rapidly;
Acknowledgements This study was performed with financial support of European Social Fund co-financed project 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
Agricultural Biomass Resources, Opportunities, and Constraints Presentation to the Western Governors’ Association Clean and Diversified Energy Advisory.
Defra Bioenergy Crops R&D Programme Bruno Viegas Sustainable Farming and Food Science Division.
GroPro, September 2008 Applying Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Select Measures for Groundwater Protection Andrew Lovett School of Environmental Sciences,
Ecological impacts of genetically engineered crops: a case study of the Farm Scale Evaluations L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger University of Nebraska.
Repeated undersowing of clover in organic cereal production. Nutrient dynamics and sustainability. Anne-Kristin Løes, Bioforsk Organic Food and Farming.
Ausilio Bauen Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology Bioenergy, greenhouse gas abatement and policy integration in the UK… Are we asking.
POTENTIAL FOR ENERGY FROM BIOMASS IN THE UK Alex McBurnie ENV-2E02 Energy Resources February 24 th 2005.
RATING-SRC Reducing Environmental Impacts of Short- Rotation Coppice (SRC) Through Evidence-Based Integrated Decision Support Tools Dimitriou I. a*, Bolte.
The Economics of Alternative Biomass Collection Systems David Ripplinger Transportation Research Forum March 14,
Controlling weeds in vegetable farming is a major concern. Most growers use conventional tillage practices. Excessive tillage, however, decreases organic.
CONTACT: Koldo Saez de Bikuña Biotic Stocks Potential: an improved indicator for Land Use impact assessment? Potential Natural Vegetation.
AAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Biodiversity and agriculture
Powering the Future: Biofuels
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
BRC Science Highlight Cover Crops and Pest Suppression in Annual Maize Bioenergy Cropping Systems Objective To determine the impact of a winter cover crop.
THE ECONOMICS OF SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE IN THE UK
Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future
II. Abundance is highest in the wildflower treatment.
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
ForestGrowth-SRC, a process-based model of short rotation coppice (SRC) growth and yield. Used to predict optimum sites for supplying woody fuel to the.
Investigation of biochar effects as a non-structural BMP on soil erosional responses using a rainfall simulator Ataallah Khademalrasoul1, Nikolaus.J. Kuhn2,
THE ECONOMICS OF SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE IN THE UK
Conclusion & Discussion
Dandelion Transection Lab: In your IAN
Outline of presentation
Notes:.
Presentation transcript:

Potential Biodiversity and Environmental Impacts of Commercial Willow SRC Production in the UK. Rebecca L. Rowe 1, Nathaniel R. Street 1, Michael E. Hanley 2, Dave Goulson 3, Gail Taylor 1 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7PX. 2 School of Biological Sciences B415, Portland Square, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA 3 School of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA Contact Ground flora species richness and abundance in Willow SRC is greater than in arable land suggesting that conversion of arable land would be beneficial for plant diversity. In contrast the conversion of set-aside would not be beneficial. Winged invertebrate abundance is comparable in all land uses, however the distribution of the orders varies between land uses suggesting that willow SRC plantations could increase farm scale invertebrate biodiversity. The review of current literature suggested that the use of biomass crops especial perennial crops, has the potential to provide a range of benefits. In addition the use of and the development of new SRC varieties specifically for phytoremedation has the potential to assist in making these crops economically viable. 1. Compare plant and winged invertebrate abundance and diversity in commercial Willow SRC plantation to arable and uniquely set-aside land. 2. Assess current knowledge base on a range of possible environmental impacts of bioenergy crops Table 1: Relative effects of the conversion of arable land to energy crop production. Summarized results of the literature review: Table 1 Illustrates the advantages of perennial energy crops over annual crops, but also highlights areas where future research is required. Of the possible bioenergy crops willow (Salix spp.) short rotation coppice (SRC), is one of the most developed in the UK, the cultivation of which represents a significant change in farming practices resulting in questions about the potential effects on farmland biodiversity Few studies in the UK have made direct comparisons of biodiversity in willow SRC at a commercial scale and other land uses, and none have included set- aside land. Thus this study aims to explore the possible impact on biodiversity of the replacement of arable land and set-aside with willow SRC. In addition, a literature review was conducted to assesses the evidence base for wider environmental impacts of large-scale bioenergy deployment within the UK context Three commercial willow SRC plantations and matched control plots of both arable and set-aside land were surveyed in August Ground flora surveys were conducted (24, 4m 2 quadrates per plot) and samples of above ground biomass were also collected. Yellow sticky traps were utilized to survey winged invertebrates, with trapped invertebrates being later identified to order (Fig 1). In addition a review of current literature was conducted, to assess current evidence bases for the effects of biomass crops on soil properties, hydrology, biodiversity, green houses gas emission and visual impacts. Fig 2. Ground flora species richness, showing that within the crop area, species richness is greatest in set- aside land, then willow SRC and final arable land. Same letter indicates no significant difference at 5% level. Fig 1: Yellow sticky traps. Traps were set up at 15 sampling points per plot with traps set at three heights at each sampling point (a). Traps were left in place for 144 hr before being collected (b) and returned to the lab for processing ab 4. Ground Flora Results Crop Type/ Environmental Impact Short Rotation Coppice Miscanthus Biofuel Crops (Wheat, oilseed rape, sugar beet) Soil Organic Carbon  Nitrogen leaching & Erosion  Phytoremedation  N/A Visual Impacts  Avian Diversity  a  b b  Plants Diversity  b  Invertebrates Diversity  c  b  Mammals Diversity  b  Hydrology dd  d  Energy and Carbon Balance   Positive effect , Negative effect , No effect . In most cases mixed result from individual’s studies are seen, this is especially so for research relating soil processes and is often caused by differences in the original soil status. (a) Negative impacts on some species of farmland birds. (b) More data for the UK is required before conclusion can be made. (c) Results based on invertebrate groups studied so far but more work is required on a wider range of species. (d) No effect on catchment scale hydrology is seen if plantations are sited according to current Defra guidelines. Fig 3: Ground flora biomass, showing the comparable flora abundance in set-aside and willow SRC, and the low values for arable land. Same letter indicates no significant difference at 5% level. Fig 4: Invertebrate abundance. Abundance was found to be comparable in all land uses. Same letter indicates no significant difference at 5% level Fig 5: Effect of land use on invertebrate orders. A selection of the 22 orders size classes recorded is shown. This shows which orders are more abundant in willow SRC. 5. Winged Invertebrate Results 6. Literature review results 1. Aims 2. Introduction 3.Methods 7. Conclusions Thanks to the land owners for providing access to sites, and to my field assistants, M. Aylott, S. Milner, A. Wan, S. Yorke, for all their hard work. Funding provided by NERC. Due to large number of references used in the review a full list is available on request 9. Acknowledgements and References