1. What have we learned from 50-year large scale field study on the biodiversity in an agricultural landscape? Krzysztof Kujawa, Jerzy Karg Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań 1

2. General view of the study area Dezydery Chlapowski Landscape Park Small fields Wooded patches Shelterbelts Fot. J. Karg Field Station in Turew 2 Main study area: the Dezydery Chłapowski Landscape Park Photo K. Kujawa

3. Gen. Dezydery Chłapowski Origin: 1810-1820 For crop protection and wood Mid-field tree lines: why so many ? Photo K. Kozłowski Unique feature of the area: large variety of windbreaks, tree lines, hedgerows and other small wooded patches Photo K. Kujawa

4. Study on biodiversity carried out by IAFE near Turew Effect of habitat and landscape structure Effect of habitat and landscape structure Long-term changes – 50 years Long-term changes – 50 years Effect of prey-predator relationships (insects, Red Fox vs birds) Effect of prey-predator relationships (insects, Red Fox vs birds) 4 Taxa studied: vascular plants vascular plants macrofungi macrofungi insects insects spiders spiders other invertebrates other invertebrates fish fish amphibians amphibians birds birds mammals mammals

5. Methods (main) – insects For migrating insects – tower with passive trap For epigeic insects – suction trap: For flying insects – motor-net: 5 Photo K. Kujawa

6. Methods – other taxa Birds: Sampling plots, points and transects Plants and macrofungi: Sampling plots and long routes across a variety of habitats 6

7. Key results: 1. High biological diversity 7

8. 8 Number of species in Turew area and Poland 0.05% of Poland

9. Number of species in Turew area and Poland 0.05% of Poland

10. Vascular plants No. of species – 828 spp. (54% of regional list) 85 spp. of special care, 1 sp. from II Annex of HD, 2 spp. from Red Data Book, 44 spp. protected by law Vascular plants No. of species – 828 spp. (54% of regional list) 85 spp. of special care, 1 sp. from II Annex of HD, 2 spp. from Red Data Book, 44 spp. protected by law 10 Common Corncockle Agrostemma githago Photo K. Kujawa

11. Number of macrofungi species in Turew area and in Polish national parks in relation to their area Crowned Earthstar Geastrum coronatum Photo K. Kujawa

12. 12 Number of breeding bird species in Polish farmlands in relation to study area size (no. of years is given) Turew Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio Photo K. Kujawa

13. 13 Key results: 2. Key factor for preserving biodiversity: habitat and landscape diversity

14. 40 aquatic communites (180 spp.) 82 terrestrial communites (648 spp.) 122 plant communities, 54 endangered regionally 39 indicators of habitat from II Annex of Habitat Directive Daisyleaf grape-fern Botrychium matricariifolium Photo K. Kujawa Photo K. Kozłowski

15. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 ForestParksTree beltsTree clumpTree alleyOthers Habitat category Number of sites Number of sites of 16 species protected by law (Poland – ca. 100 spp. ) in various habitats of agricultural landscape near Turew 15 Photo K. Kujawa

16. 16

17. 17 Diversity (H’) of spider assemblages in various crop fields and two landscape types

18. 18 Relationships between share of small wooded islands and bird density in Polish farmland Turew

19. 19 Key results: 3. Potential for biological control related to habitat and landscape diversity

20. 20 Spiders Fot. K. Kujawa

21. Effect of distance from shelterbelt on species numbers of plant-dwelling spiders in crop fields (3-years study) ? Photo K. Kujawa

22. Effect of landscape type on share of types of spiders webs in sugar beet plantations (3-years studies)

23. Insects Fot. K. Kujawa

24. Effect of tree belt on density of insect larvae infected by parasitic insects (Ichneumonidae and Chalcidoidea)

25. 25 Trophic structure of insect assemblages wintering in crop fields and shelterbelts

26. 26 Key results (unexpected!): 4. In contrary to our previous conlusions, high and constant landscape diversity seems to be not sufficient for preserving biodiversity when intensity of farming practices is above some threshold

27. Long-term changes – insects H > U H = U H < U !!

28. Long-term changes – birds 28

29. Long-term changes – birds 29

30. 30 Key results: (by the way...) 5. A conservation paradox? One of most abundant tree species in the Turew area is Black Locust, listed in 100 worst invasive species in Europe

31. Black Locust in Turew area

32. Insect taxonomical richness in „native” and Black Locust tree belts Phot. K. Kujawa Native (multi-species)Black Locust

33. Birds – species richness in „native” and Black Locust wood islands Number of wooded islands Native Locust

34. Agricultural landscape near Turew is inhabited by a variety of species-rich communities, that among others include species of high conservation priority High diversity and abundance of predatory and parasitic species create favorable condition for application of biological control High and stable landscape heterogeneity supports high biodiversity level, however long term analysis indicates that it is not able to counteract intensification of agriculture when it is above some threshold that seems to be crossed. Thus, also potential for biological control may be strongly impoverished SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS: 34

35. Thank you for attention 35 Authors (of published and unpublished data): Dr Hanna Gołdyn and Dr Ewa Arczyńska-Chudy (plants) Prof. Jerzy Karg (insects) Dr. Anna Kujawa (macrofungi), Dr. Krzysztof Kujawa (birds) Dr. Maria Oleszczuk (spiders) Dr. M. Rybacki (amphibians) M. Sc. Dariusz Sobczyk (butterflies) and others