NCLBNCLB No Child Left Behind (take notes, please)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Highly Qualified Teachers Lori L. Buchanan Federal Programs & Monitoring Certification Coordinator Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Jack O’Connell State Superintendent No Child Left Behind Act.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Supplementary Authorizations and Subject Matter Authorizations For Multiple Subject and Single Subject Teaching Credentials.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Hickory Ridge Elementary School Annual Title One Parent Meeting
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
Cleveland Municipal School District Educating Cleveland’s Children.
The Massachusetts Story: Are There Lessons To Be Learned? SHEEO Conference August 17, 2005.
A “Best Fit” Approach to Improving Teacher Resources Jennifer King Rice University of Maryland.
No Child Left Behind Teacher Qualification. NCLB: Three Main Parts All teachers to meet new federal standards –New hires to meet standards now –Existing.
Highly Qualified Teachers Lori L. Buchanan Federal Programs & Monitoring Certification Coordinator Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Norm-Referenced and Criterion- Referenced Assessments A Historical view from 1900 to the Present.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
Education in America, Is the American Education System Leaving Children Behind?
What ACCESS, the New Virginia Test for LEP Students, Means for School Districts LEP Caucus Presentation July 2008.
The Bucks County Montessori Charter School PSSA Results, Local District Comparisons, and Year to Year Progressions.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Design a creative, career appropriate title page
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
State Assessment Parent Presentation. 05/14/03 Why is this in place? Federal legislation passed in 2001  No Child Left Behind Reauthorization of the.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS No Child Left Behind 11/23/09.
1 No Child Left Behind and Highly Qualified Teachers Egg-Harbor-Township-Schools Fall 2003.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting W.H. Rhodes Elementary School School Year.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
Walker Valley High School. MARCH 18, 2013 Parent Meeting Class of 2015.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
US Government Mrs. Lacks ON THE ISSUES: EDUCATION.
Presented By: Kealee Paulsen, Chelsea Varney, Zoë Brown, McKenna Marshall.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Curriculum Planning CHAPTER 21 JANUARY 26. Standards  Federal Mandates  State Standards: Academic Standards | NDE  Local School District Welcome to.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Southern Huntingdon County Title 1 Annual Meeting October 20, 2014.
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
No Child Left Behind.
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education and Accountability
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

NCLBNCLB No Child Left Behind (take notes, please)

What is it? Major education legislative passed at the federal level –Remember, education is traditionally a state and local responsibility Bipartisan effort –Effective 2002 Reauthorization and modification of “Elementary and Secondary Education Act”

Focus Standards-based reform Basic Idea: Setting high standards and measuring outcomes will improve school and student performance

How is this reform implemented? Annual standards-based testing –SOLs in Virginia Higher qualification standards for teachers –Degree or advanced degree in the core subject or –Major equivalent in the core subject (30 semester credits or the equivalent) or –Passing score on state-approved Praxis II exam in core content –Pass the State Performance Review and/or state-approved teaching program Annual progress report cards (AYP) –Based on test results and variety of other measures, including teacher qualifications Funding from a variety of levels –i.e. If your school measures well, it may be entitled to federal funds and educational subsidies

Success of NCLB Teachers actually teach content now! –Local standards have improved Students with disabilities (learning and physical) have showed higher graduation rates School Choice –If a school is not making AYP, then a student may have the choice to enroll in another school Test scores have improved in many districts

Critics Say… Deadline of 2014 for all schools to be up to standards is too soon “Teaching to the test” –How might “high stakes” testing be detrimental to students and/or teachers? Too much focus on reading, math, science –Funds being taken away from arts, music, electives

Critics Say… Schools like YHS making AYP? –What issues might you see with this?