The Plausible Range of GIA Contributions to 3-D Motions at GPS Sites in the SNARF Network 2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Mark Tamisiea 1, Jerry Mitrovica 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geodetic monitoring of crustal deformation in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica Hannu Koivula, Jaakko Mäkinen, Joel Ahola and Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic.
Advertisements

An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
Century-scale continent-to-ocean ice mass transport and measurement of lithospheric thickness and mantle viscosity using GPS Erik R. Ivins (JPL/Caltech)
Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
By Willy Fjeldskaar IRIS. Modelling technique Modelling technique Glacial isostasy Iceload data Calibration data Development 2006 Development 2006.
Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Contributions to Tide Gauge, Altimetry and GRACE Observations Glenn Milne Dept of Earth Sciences University of Durham, UK.
Vertical Crustal Motion in the North Pacific and Implications for Tide Gauge Records and Sea Level Rise Jeff Freymueller and Christopher F. Larsen Geophysical.
A Preliminary Calibrated Deglaciation Chronology for the Eurasian Ice Complex Lev Tarasov¹, W.R. Peltier², R. Gyllencreutz³, O. Lohne³, J. Mangerud³, and.
Observing Glacial Rebound Using GPS Giovanni Sella and Seth Stein Northwestern University Michael Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada.
National Survey and Cadastre - Denmark Crustal deformations at permanent GPS sites in Denmark Shfaqat Abbas Khan and Per Knudsen, Geodetic Dept., Kort.
Glacial Rebound Glacial Rebound Studies depend on many factors. What are they ? Ice load History of the load Ocean water load on coastlines and globally.
Monitoring the Global Sea Level Rise Budget with Jason, Argo and GRACE Observations Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA/Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry.
G21C-01: First Report of the Stable North America Reference Frame (SNARF) Working Group G21C-01: First Report of the Stable North America Reference Frame.
Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability 6-9 June, 2006 Paris, France The.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 5 Nov: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Generally, loading will occur both by.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 31 Oct: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Isostasy is a stress balance resulting.
1 Applications of the CORS System Richard Snay & Giovanni Sella National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA NOAA GNSS Workshop Boulder, Colorado.
FORWARD AND INVERSE MODELLING OF GPS OBSERVATIONS FROM FENNOSCANDIA G.A. Milne 1, J.X. Mitrovica 2, H.-G. Scherneck 3, J.L. Davis 4, J.M. Johansson 3,
Generalization of Farrell's loading theory for applications to mass flux measurement using geodetic techniques J. Y. Guo (1,2), C.K. Shum (1) (1) Laboratory.
Using GRACE to estimate changes in land water storage: present limitations and future potential John Wahr, Sean Swenson, Isabella Velicogna University.
The Hunting of the SNARF Giovanni F. Sella Seth Stein Northwestern University Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami "What's the good of Mercator's North.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
GLACIAL ISOSTATIC ADJUSTMENT AND COASTLINE MODELLING Glenn Milne
Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,
Sea-Level Change Driven by Recent Cryospheric and Hydrological Mass Flux Mark Tamisiea Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics James Davis Emma Hill.
Observing Glacial Rebound Using GPS Giovanni Sella.
Thoughts on the GIA Issue in SNARF Jim Davis & Tom Herring Input from and discussions with Mark Tamisiea, Jerry Mitrovica, and Glenn Milne.
An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
Bernhard Steinberger Mantle evolution and dynamic topography of the African Plate Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam and Physics of Geological Processes,
The Lithosphere There term lithosphere is in a variety of ways. The most general use is as: The lithosphere is the upper region of the crust and mantle.
Rheology of the Earth. Schedule Rheology Viscous, elastic & plastic Viscous, elastic & plastic Deformation maps and “Christmas tree’s” for mantle & lithosphere.
Patagonia Ice Field Melting Observed by GRACE Joint International GSTM and DFG SPP Symposium, October 15-17, 2007 at GFZ Potsdam J.L. Chen 1, C.R. Wilson.
Using Flubber to Study Glaciers A Hands-on Experience.
(a) Pre-earthquake and (b) post-earthquake Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images of North Sentinel Island. The.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
The Glacial Isostatic Adjustment of Fennoscandia: from Celcius to BIFROST Glenn Milne, University of Durham February 2004.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
A Preliminary Calibrated Deglaciation Chronology for the Eurasian Ice Complex Lev Tarasov¹, W.R. Peltier², R. Gyllencreutz³, O. Lohne³, J. Mangerud³, and.
Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.
The effect of GIA models on mass-balance estimates in Antarctica Riccardo Riva, Brian Gunter, Bert Vermeersen, Roderik Lindenbergh and Hugo Schotman Department.
Why does Venus lack a magnetic field? Francis Nimmo, Department of Geological Sciences, University College of London.
A better GRACE solution for improving the regional Greenland mass balance Z Xu 1, E.J.O Schrama 1, W. van der. Wal 1 1 Department of Astrodynamics and.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
Conservation of Salt: Conservation of Heat: Equation of State: Conservation of Mass or Continuity: Equations that allow a quantitative look at the OCEAN.
Don Chambers Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin Josh Willis Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology R.
Department of Earth Sciences “A. Desio”
  The basic premise of the plate tectonic theory is that the Earth’s surface is like a cracked eggshell.  Each piece being called plates.
Glaciation-Induced Sea-Level Change: Theory and Applications Glenn Milne, University of Durham February 2004.
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea, James Davis, and Emma Hill Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Don P. Chambers College of Marine Science University of South Florida Measuring Mean Ocean Mass Variability with GRACE NASA Sea Level Workshop, Austin.
Towards a standard model for present-day signals due to postglacial rebound H.-P. Plag, C. Kreemer Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Antarctic ice mass change estimates from GRACE: Results, uncertainties, and the combination with complementary information Martin Horwath, Reinhard Dietrich.
ON DETERMINATION OF THE MOMENT INERTIA AND THE RADIUS OF THE MARTIAN CORE Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth Russian Academy of Sciences
FORWARD AND INVERSE MODELLING OF GPS OBSERVATIONS OF FENNOSCANDIAN GIA G.A. Milne 1, J.X. Mitrovica 2, H.-G. Scherneck 3, J.L. Davis 4, J.M. Johansson.
Jacqueline Austermann Harriet Lau, Jerry Mitrovica CIDER community workshop, May 6 th 2016 Image credit: Mike Beauregard Towards reconciling viscosity.
Figure 1 Predictions of (a) polar wander speed, (c) polar wander direction and (e) as a function of lower-mantle viscosity, in which an elastic lithosphere.
Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
By C. Haeger1,2, M. Kaban1, B. Chen3 & A. Petrunin1,4 June 15, 2017
Horizontal GIA Velocities and Reference-Frame Determination
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1
Presentation transcript:

The Plausible Range of GIA Contributions to 3-D Motions at GPS Sites in the SNARF Network 2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Mark Tamisiea 1, Jerry Mitrovica 2, Jim Davis 3 1 University of Colorado, 2 University of Toronto, 3 Harvard-Smithsonian CFA

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Motivation Majority of studies using GPS data investigate tectonic deformations – the GIA signal is noise. Developing a GIA model that best reduces the variance between the model prediction and GPS data may well remove tectonic signals. Are there regions where the GIA signal is robust with respect to model variations?

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D Models Solid Earth Model Elastic Model – PREM – well known Viscosity Model – vigorously debated Example: 71 p5 5 Lithosphere – 71 km thick Upper Mantle Viscosity – 5 x Pa s Lower Mantle Viscosity – 5 x Pa s

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Varying the Earth Model Use all combinations of: Lithospheric Thickness : 71, 96, 120 km Upper Mantle Viscosity : {2, 3, 5, 8} x Pa s Lower Mantle Viscosity : {5, 8, 10, 20, 30} x Pa s

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Ice Models ICE-I – completely independent of Earth model –Peltier and Andrews, 1976 ICE-3G – model uses assumption of Earth model –Tushingham and Peltier, 1991 Insufficient geological data exists to fully constrain the ice sheet models. Thus, construction of the model must be supplemented by geodetic data and/or glaciological models.

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Model Solutions Solve the model using the sea level equation: 1.Conserve mass 2.Apply ocean and ice loads to Earth to determine deformation 3.Adjust ocean load Refinements to sea level theory: 1.Time-variable coastlines 2.Water dumping 3.Feedback from rotational perturbation

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Radial DisplacementModel: 71 p5 5 – ICE-3G 2. Model Results 1 mm/yr

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 1 mm/yr Horizontal DisplacementModel: 71 p5 5 – ICE-3G

1 mm/yr 2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Varying the Earth Model Radial Displacement

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 1 mm/yr Northward Displacement

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 1 mm/yr Eastward Displacement

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Average Horizontal Velocities with 2  variation 1 mm/yr

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 1 mm/yr Using Additional Constraints Viscosity Model from Mitrovica and Forte, 2004 UM = (3 to 6) x10 20 Pa s TLM = (1 to 3) x Pa s BLM = (8 to 30) x Pa s

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 1 mm/yr Errors Introduced by Ice Models Difference between solutions using ICE-3G and ICE1

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Conclusions The range of uncertainties in the Earth model produce large variations of the prediction of the GIA signal. Large variations caused by the ice sheet model are mainly confined to regions under or near the ice sheet at last glacial maximum. Model results for vertical rates may be useful in certain regions if additional constraints are added.

2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03