Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions 1 Peggy G. Carr National Center for Education Statistics November 17, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012 Quality Assurance in a Chaotic World An External Perspective.
Advertisements

Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Fairness, Accuracy, & Consistency in Assessment
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
Campus Improvement Plans
STATE STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS. 1969The National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) administered for the first time, Florida participated in the.
1 Judy W. Park, Ed.D., Associate Superintendent, Utah State Office of Education.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Creating a Unified PLA Policy Recommendation for the State University of New York Ross Garmil Empire State College PLA with a Purpose Symposium April 29,
Curriculum Development Center (CDC) Curriculum Development Process Continue.
McCann Associates Presented by: Michael Childs, Barbara Dyer, Ira Taylor, Bruce Nugyen Chad Warner & Joe Koury, McCann Associates.
National Assessment of Educational Progress Felicia Mallory, Executive Director Denetra Collins, Staff Specialist.
The College Board: Expanding College Opportunity The College Board is a national nonprofit membership association dedicated to preparing, inspiring, and.
April 2008Getting Involved in STAR1 STAR Item Writing, Assessment Review Panels, Standard Setting, and Field Testing Webcast April 23, 2008 START TIME.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network Thursday, March 21, 2013 Future.
Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,
New York State Education Department Understanding The Process: Science Assessments and the New York State Learning Standards.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
The Bologna Declaration and its implementation at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) JEP UM Zagreb, 28 October 2004 An Huts International.
Quality in language assessment – guidelines and standards Waldek Martyniuk ECML Graz, Austria.
Project:“Support to the Internationalization of Kosova Higher Education System through establishment of the Kosova Students’ Union” Status Quo on Student.
Overview of Standard Setting Leslie Wilson Assistant State Superintendent Accountability and Assessment August 26, 2008.
Who in the World Develops and Writes the MI-Access Items? OEAA Conference 2007 – Day 2 MI-Access Coordinators.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
An Overview of Virginia Standards of Learning Item and Test Development.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
School Library Selection Policy Coosa Valley Elementary School.
Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007.
Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.
 This policy applies to all campuses, one elementary school and one high school.  All district employed library media specialists are to adhere to the.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 16 – Validity.
NAEP Achievement Levels Michael Ward, Chair of COSDAM Susan Loomis, Assistant Director NAGB Christina Peterson, Project Director ACT.
A Presentation to the USDOE January 13, 2010 Mary Ann Snider Chief of Educator Excellence and Instructional Effectiveness Race to the Top- Assessment Programs.
Curriculum Directors Meeting February 24, 2016.
Curriculum Efficiency: From Idea to Approval Rich Cameron, Cerritos College, Facilitator Julie Bruno, Vice President, ASCCC, Sierra College Grant Goold,
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee January 11, 2016.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March Keric Ashley,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
Overview of PARCC Field Test 1. Why Are We Doing a Field Test in the Spring 2014? The primary purposes of the PARCC Field Test are to: 1.Examine the quality.
Cañada College Professional Development Committee Determining Participants.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
August 28, Liz Jones Suzanne Swaffield Douglas Alexander Anne Mruz Chris Webster 2.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Eastern’s Assessment System
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Local Senates and Boards
Language Proficiency Assessment Detlev Kesten Associate Provost, Academic Support.
Division of Talent and Performance
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Faculty Role in AP Credit
Secondary Assessment Calendar
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
AACC Mini Conference June 8-9, 2011
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Navigating the College Culture
Curriculum Selection Process
Presentation transcript:

Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions 1 Peggy G. Carr National Center for Education Statistics November 17, 2007

Item Development Process and Schedule Explain the item development process and schedule Complexity Inclusiveness of the process Attention to quality 2 Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

New vs. Existing Frameworks For new frameworks Create all new items More than 4 years from development to implementation For existing frameworks Ongoing development for replacement blocks (3 per assessment per grade) Nearly 3 years from development to implementation For both types of frameworks More than 300 people involved in each assessment Twice the number of items needed are created for paper and pencil items 3 Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

How It Works Framework 4 Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

How It Works Framework -Plan -Develop -Expert Input -Develop -Field Test -Develop -Expert Input -Develop 5 Step 1Step 2Step 3Step 6Step 4Step 5 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Framework Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

How It Works How It works Framework –Plan – 3 months –Develop – 7 months –Expert Input – 3 months –Develop – 7 months –Field Test – 8 months –Develop – 4 months –Expert Input – 2 months –Develop – 3 months Operational 6 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Framework Operational 3 months 7 months 3 months 7 months 8 months 4 months 2 months 3 months Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Contractors Educational Testing Service (ETS) NAEP Education Statistics Services Institute (NESSI) Pearson Westat Fulcrum Logistics 7 Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Outside Experts Planning Committee (12) Representatives from framework and standing committees Standing Committee (12-18) Members from framework committee Curriculum specialists, university education faculty, etc. State and District Review Panel ( ) Representatives from each state or district Assessment directors, content specialists Academic Review Panel (5-9) Experts in the subject area (mathematicians, scientists) 8 Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Ensuring Quality The number of reviews The qualifications of our reviewers Examination of empirical data collected during both pilot and operational data collections Quality control measures 9 Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Plan Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions 10 NESSI ETS 10 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Plan Ensure that we are following both the letter and intent of the framework An implementation plan for the entire process Guidelines/blueprint for the item development contractor Inventory and evaluation of items in current pools

Develop 11 ETS Additional Contractors 11 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Develop Selection of stimuli Reading passages, political cartoons, ICT topics Governing Board approval Item writing Writers trained on frameworks and specifications 4-5 professional staff per content area At least one has advanced degree in content area At least one trained in how students learn the content Bias and fairness review Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Develop (continued) 12 Develop Small Scale Study About 50 responses per item For special items (ICTs, HOTs, etc.) Cutting-edge Additional time and research Platform and administrative processes and procedures Special working groups of experts ETS 12 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Expert Input 13 Expert Input Ensure diversity of opinions and input Standing Committee State and District Reviewers NESSI ETS Logistics 13 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Expert Input (continued) 14 Expert Input Standing Committee Goal Consistency with framework Grade or age appropriate Alignment with the scoring rubric Pool of items match with blueprint Appropriate and adequate coverage of: Content Difficulty Dimensions Item type NESSI ETS Logistics 14 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Expert Input (continued) 15 Expert Input State and District Goal Consistency with framework Variance from what would be assessed in the state Perspectives from around the country Consideration for what students are being taught NESSI ETS Logistics 15 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Develop 16 Develop Further Item Development Resolution of comments from reviews Items revised Quality control Governing Board comments ETS 16 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Pilot Test 17 NESSI ETS Pearson Westat Pilot Test Includes production time, administration, and data analysis At least 1500 responses per item Administered at same time as operational assessments 17 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Develop 18 Develop Further Item Development Proposed selection of items for the operational assessment Revisions based on empirical data from the pilot assessment ETS 18 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Expert Input 19 Expert Input Standing Committee Review of the proposed item pool in its entirety Review of individual items for quality Academic Panel Mathematicians, scientists, etc. Accurate representation of the subject matter Balance of accuracy and grade- level appropriateness NESSI ETS Logistics 19 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Develop 20 Develop Further Item Development Resolution of comments from reviews Items revised Quality control Governing Board comments ETS 20 PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Governing Board Input 21 Governing Board Input PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Framework Operational Frameworks Approval of stimuli Governing Board comments Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

Critical NCES Decisions and Activities -Critical NCES Decisions and Activities 22 Critical NCES Decisions and Activities PlanDevelop Expert Input Develop Expert Input Develop Field Test Framework Operational Implementation Plan Guidelines Resolution of review comments Resolution of comments and concerns, quality control Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions

NAEP Related Resources For further information regarding NAEP item development, visit these NAEP and NAGB websites: Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions