GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 15 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Oct: T&S 105-130 Last Time: RHEOLOGY Dislocation creep is sensitive to: Temperature.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 1. How to model: physical grounds
Advertisements

Fracture and Failure Theory. Defining Failure Failure can be defined in a variety of ways: Unable to perform the to a given criteria Fracture Yielding.
(Introduction to) Earthquake Energy Balance
Stress and Deformation: Part II (D&R, ; ) 1. Anderson's Theory of Faulting 2. Rheology (mechanical behavior of rocks) - Elastic: Hooke's.
Goal: To understand how different deformation mechanisms control the rheological behavior of rocks Rheology and deformation mechanisms.
This presentation relies on: 1) 2)
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 10 Oct 2014 Last Time: RHEOLOGY
Structural Geology Ch. 5 – Rheology
Stress and Deformation: Part I (D&R, ; ) The goal for today is to explore the stress conditions under which rocks fail (e.g., fracture),
FAULTING & DEFORMATION
‘Triggering’ = a perturbation in the loading deformation that leads to a change in the probability of failure. Overview of Evidence for Dynamic Triggering.
FAULT ZONE FABRIC AND FAULT WEAKNESS Cristiano Collettini, Andre Niemeijer, Cecilia Viti & Chris Marone Nature 2009.
Scaling of viscous shear zones with depth dependent viscosity and power law stress strain-rate dependence James Moore and Barry Parsons.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 12 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 14 Nov: T&S Last Time: Te and Rheology Key point of Willett et al. papers: T.
Distribution of Microcracks in Rocks Uniform As in igneous rocks where microcrack density is not related to local structures but rather to a pervasive.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 05 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 7 Nov: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Tharsis example Is the Tharsis province.
Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Lecture 5, 12 Sep Fluids: Mechanical, Chemical Effective Stress Dilatancy.
Soil Physics 2010 Outline Announcements Basic rheology Soil strength Triaxial test.
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments David Kohlstedt Brian Evans Stephen Mackwell.
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
Lecture-11 1 Lecture #11- Faults and Faulting. Lecture-11 2 Faults Bound the Major Plates.
Stress, Strain, Elasticity and Faulting Lecture 11/23/2009 GE694 Earth Systems Seminar.
Announcements This week's lab: 1-3 PM with Andrew McCarthy. Please come prepared with specific questions. There will be no lecture this Wednesday! Please.
Announcements Midterm next Monday! Midterm review during lab this week Extra credit opportunities: (1) This Thurs. 4 pm, Rm. Haury Bldg. Rm 216, "The role.
Geodetic monitoring of subduction zones Some idea of the kinematics of the subduction interface can be inferred from surface deformation measured from.
Rheology rheology What is rheology ? From the root work “rheo-” Current: flow Greek: rhein, to flow (river) Like rheostat – flow of current.
Rock Deformation and Geologic Structures
Ge277-Experimental Rock Friction implication for seismic faulting Some other references: Byerlee, 1978; Dieterich, 1979; Ruina, 1983; Tse and Rice, 1986;
Stress, Strain, and Viscosity San Andreas Fault Palmdale.
The Mechanics of the crust
Ge 277- ‘From rock mechanics to seismotectonics’ Objective of seminar Review major results form rock mechanics laboratory experiments and discuss how these.
Aftershocks tend to fall preferentially in area of static Coulomb stress increase but there are also earthquakes in area of decrease Coulomb stress Aftershocks.
(Scholz, 1990). Friction behavior for a wide range of materials is shown for step changes in load point velocity (Dieterich & Kilgore 1994). Experimental.
Roland Burgmann and Georg Dresen
The Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors 18 Sep. 2013, C. Marone, Geosc500 Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Stick-slip dynamics and Instability. Introduction.
 ss=  * +(a-b) ln(V/V * ) a-b > 0 stable sliding a-b < 0 slip is potentially unstable Correspond to T~300 °C For Quartzo- Feldspathic rocks Stationary.
Earthquake nucleation How do they begin? Are large and small ones begin similarly? Are the initial phases geodetically or seismically detectable? Related.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 5 Nov: T&S Last Time: Flexural Isostasy Generally, loading will occur both by.
CAPTURING PHYSICAL PHENOMENA IN PARTICLE DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF GRANULAR GOUGE Effects of Contact Laws, Particle Size Distribution, and the 3 rd Dimension.
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 1 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside.
Dilatancy/Compaction and Slip Instabilities of Fluid Infiltrated Faults Vahe Gabuchian GE169B/277 01/25/2012 Dr. Lapusta Dr. Avouac Experimental results.
Continental Faults at Depth: the roots of the debate Ge Summary: How continents deform is a much debated question. Whether surface strain is localized.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 10 Sep 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 10 Sep: T&S Last Time: Radiogenic Heating; Topography Radioactive decay of crustal.
Rheology of the Earth. Schedule Rheology Viscous, elastic & plastic Viscous, elastic & plastic Deformation maps and “Christmas tree’s” for mantle & lithosphere.
Theoretical and experimental investigation of dynamic friction at seismic slip rates Yuri Fialko and Kevin Brown Institute of Geophysics and Planetary.
The role of water on lithospheric strength Chester et al., 1995, A rheologic model for wet crust applied to strike-slip faults Hirth et al., An evaluation.
How Faulting Keeps Crust Strong? J. Townend & M.D. Zoback, 2000 Geology.
Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Norman H. Sleep & Michael L. Blanpied Ge 277 – February 19, 2010.
Laurent G. J. Montési Maria T. Zuber ASME, 1999 The importance of localization for the development of large-scale structures in the Earth’s crust.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.
Constant stress experiment ductile elastic Constant stress (strain varies) Constant strain (stress varies)
Seismic and Aseismic Slip During Hydraulic Fracturing Stephen Perry.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 21 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Mon 1 Dec: T&S Last Time: The Lithosphere Revisited There are several different processes.
Aseismic deformation transients in subduction zone and the role of fault dilatancy -- Numerical simulation in the framework of rate and state friction.
Geology Failure Models
Today: Back to stress stress in the earth Strain Measuring Strain Strain Examples Today: Back to stress stress in the earth Strain Measuring Strain Strain.
Brittle Deformation Remember that  is the angle between  3 and a plane.
Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class- Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere.
Mohr-Coulomb failure Goal: To understand relationship between stress, brittle failure, and frictional faulting and to use this relationship to predict.
EART 118 Seismotectonics MWF D250 9:30-10:40 am; Th D250 2:00-4:00 pm Prof.: Thorne Lay, C382 E&MS, Office Hours 11:00-12:00 MWF TA: Lingling Ye, Office.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 24 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 29 Oct: T&S Last Time: Brittle-field rheology The “Seismogenic Zone” is observed.
Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Sleep & Blanpied, 1992, Nature Segall & Rice, 1995 Seminar for Ge Jan. Shengji Wei.
Mechanical behavior and the degree of localization in large displacement faulting experiments N. M. Beeler and T. E. Tullis, Brown University, Providence,
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 03 Dec 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 5 Dec: T&S Last Time: Buoyancy (Tectosphere) vs Rheology The isopycnic hypothesis.
Lab #3: Strat Columns: Draw to scale Lab #3: Strat Columns: Draw to scale Includes: (left to right) Age (era and period) Name of unit Thickness of unit.
STRESS SUMMARY Stress= amount of force per unit area (units Pa) Force= mass * acceleration (units N)
Shear heating in continental strike-slip shear zones:
Workshop on Megathrust Earthquakes and Tsunami
Roland Bürgmann and Georg Dresen
Presentation transcript:

GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 15 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Oct: T&S Last Time: RHEOLOGY Dislocation creep is sensitive to: Temperature (as exp(C/T) ) Lithology (pyroxene & olivine strongest; feldspar intermediate; quartz weakest) Water (and possibly other volatiles, e.g., CO 2 ?) Diffusion creep is sensitive to each of those plus Grain size A Yield Strength Envelope represents the deviatoric stress that can be supported by the lithosphere as a function of depth, and assumes a brittle field rheology (including friction coefficient, pore fluid pressure) plus strain rate Temperature variations in the U.S. (from P-velocity) indicate temperature is not the only control on lithosphere stability!

Next Journal Article Reading: For Monday Oct 20: Pérez-Gussinyé et al. (2009) Effective elastic thickness of Africa and its relationship to other proxies for lithospheric structure and surface tectonics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 287(1-2)

Brittle-field failure & the “Seismogenic Zone” So what about that top part of the Yield Strength Envelope? For large-scale deformation in the real Earth, other important rheologies include brittle (frictional) failure in rock fracture & fault slip, described by Byerlee’s Law : Place a rock sample with an existing fracture in a lab apparatus, apply a stress normal to the fracture plane  N, then determine how much shear stress  is required to get it to slip; frictional strength is defined by a friction coefficient  :

Byerlee’s Law For dry rock, no gouge, low temperature… this is insensitive to rock type! Lab experiments & borehole stress tests suggest  ~ 0.6… But dynamical models indicate long-term  nearer !

Using Byerlee’s law (and assuming ubiquity of fractures), can define a depth-dependent failure law with frictional yield strength  as (e.g., Sibson, Nature 1974): where = P /  gz and P is pore fluid pressure,  is mass density of rock, g is gravitational acceleration, z is depth This is where the asymmetry in the brittle-field part of the YSE arises! in compression (  < 0); in extension (  > 0) 0  z

Of course the bottom part of the Yield Strength Envelope reflects a creep flow law, so it requires assumptions about lithology, geothermal gradient, water fugacity & grain size: Note however this also requires some assumption about the strain rate ! Typically we assume a constant strain rate of ~ – s -1. But in reality, strain rate is determined by the stress forcing via the constitutive law (so if we know, everywhere in 3D, the density structure and the rheology, we could calculate or model based on that). The YSE was first described and used by Goetze & Evans (GJRAS 1979). 0  z

0 z To first order, the distribution of earthquakes with depth depends on the YSE, and the “seismogenic depth” will correspond to the brittle-ductile transition. brittle = seismogenic ductile  z brittle = seismogenic ductile BUT earthquake focal depths will map to the brittle-ductile transition ONLY if ambient stress everywhere exceeds the yield strength!!! max EQ focal depth

But important to note: Frictional slip is dynamical and also depends on rate, state

Favors Stable Sliding Favors Stick-Slip Fault friction and slip velocity: Two frictional constants a and b plus a length scale D c a – b < 0: friction decreases with increasing slip velocity (  unstable) a – b > 0: friction increases with increasing slip velocity (  stable) a, b, D c depend on temperature, rock type, pore fluids, gouge properties State variable  (depends on history of slip, evolution of contact surface) Normal and shear stress on the fault Depend on: Hence friction & slip vary nonlinearly in both space and time!

Cumulative Slip (m) Pre-Slip Earthquake After-Slip J. GEOPHYS. RES., 105(E10), 2000 b – a = 0 b – a < 0 b – a > 0 A San Andreas simulation with rate-state constitutive relations… Predicts geodetic behaviors that we observe. (But what form does this part take?)

≠ Result: Earthquakes are distributed only within velocity-weakening zone!