AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natural Background Visibility Feb. 6, 2004 Presentation to VISTAS State Air Directors Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtn. National Park.
Advertisements

Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Illumination Dependent Aerosol Optical Properties n Volume scattering function n Path function n Path radiance n Atmospheric modulation transfer function.
1 Estimates of worst 20% natural condition deciview: application of the new IMPROVE algorithm and a revised statistical approach Rodger Ames, CIRA
Radiative Effects of Atmospheric Aerosols and Regional Haze Jin Xu DAS Science Talk February 17, 2004.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Map of the Guadalupe Mountains Region NEW MEXICO TEXAS Guadalupe Mtns. Park Map To Carlsbad To El Paso To I-10 Visibility Degradation in Guadalupe Mountains.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
References: Acidic Deposition:State of Science and Technology (report 24) 1990 Visibility: Existing and Historical.
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
Attribution of Haze Report Status Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting December 8, 2004 Tom Moore Marc Pitchford.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Characterization of Aerosol Physical, Optical and Chemical Properties During the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study (BRAVO) Jenny.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Update on IMPROVE Light Extinction Equation and Natural Conditions Estimates Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator May 23, 2006.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Regional Air Pollution Study Alissa Dickerson, M.S. Environmental Specialist Enviroscientists, Inc. Alissa Dickerson, M.S. Environmental Specialist Enviroscientists,
Brief Description of CALPUFF Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee.
Attribution of Haze Project Update Stationary Sources Forum and Implementation Workgroup Meeting, Phoenix December 14, 2004 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Results from January/July CMAQ Source Apportionment Modeling Gail Tonnesen,
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Regional Modeling Center (RMC) Preliminary Fire Modeling Results.
Draft, 5 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 2. Critical Evaluation of Current Approach for Estimating Natural Conditions Ivar Tombach.
Introduction Instruments designed and fabricated at the Desert Research Institute, Reno Emphasis on the Integrating Nephelometer for scattering measurements.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon and Dust – Sacramento, CA - May 23-24, 2006 WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Regional Modeling Center ENVIRON; UCR.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring Data Summary: Dust WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Project Update Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM)
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WRAP Technical Work Overview
Deciviews from Look Rock, Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Phase I Attribution of Haze Overview (Geographic Attribution for the Implementation of the Regional Haze Rule) or (an experiment in weight-of evidence)
Monitoring/Data Analysis Discussion Group June 10, 2005
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
From a manuscript draft courtesy of Bill Malm, National Park Service
IMPROVE Data Processing
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
WRAP Stationary Sources Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
TSS Data Documentation (2)
Marc Pitchford NOAA/EPA
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Introduction to IMPROVE and Regional Haze Data
Presentation transcript:

AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Review of IMPROVE Aerosol Data Visibility parameters and equations IMPROVE monitoring Regional Haze Rule data guidelines Review of 2002 IMPROVE data (selected sites) Next steps

Definitions of Visibility Visual Qualities - The color, texture, and clarity of a scene Visual Range (km) - The greatest distance at which a large black object on the horizon can be seen Extinction/Scattering/Absorption (Mm -1 ) - The fraction of light lost per unit length along a sight path Deciview (dv) - An index which is linear with human perception of visibility

Visibility Equations Extinction is the sum of particle scattering, natural atmospheric scattering, and absorption: b ext = b sp + b Rayleigh + b abs Extinction can be converted into Visual Range or Deciview: Visual Range (km) = 3912 / b ext Deciview (dv) = 10 x ln (b ext / 10)

b ext (Mm -1 ) =3 * f(RH) * [Ammonium SULFATE] +3 * f(RH) * [Ammonium NITRATE] +4 * (1.4) * [ORGANIC CARBON] +10 * [ELEMENTAL CARBON] +1 * [SOIL] +0.6 * [COARSE MASS] +Rayleigh scattering (typically use 10 Mm -1 ) Where: f(RH) is the relative humidity enhancement factor Elemental carbon is the only species which absorbs light IMPROVE Extinction Equation

IMPROVE Aerosol Sampler Systems Sulfur>>Sulfate Soil PM2.5>> Coarse Mass Nitrate Sulfate (backup) Organic Carbon Elem. Carbon PM10>> Coarse Mass

Regional Haze Rule Data Guidelines Calculate extinction based on IMPROVE equation, using 6 species and monthly f(RH) Allowed to fill in missing species data with quarterly median values if strict conditions are met Data completeness: –50% for all quarters –75% for the year –No more than 10 consecutive samples missing in a year –Minumum of 3 complete years needed to represent 5 year average Convert extinction to deciview Calculate annual 20% best and worst deciview averages

WRAP Class I Areas

IMPROVE Monitoring Sites

IMPROVE Total Aerosol Extinction Worst 20% for 2002 VIEWS web site:

IMPROVE Ammonium Sulfate Extinction Worst 20% for 2002 VIEWS web site:

IMPROVE Ammonium Nitrate Extinction Worst 20% for 2002 VIEWS web site:

IMPROVE Organic Mass Extinction Worst 20% for 2002 VIEWS web site:

2002 Data from Selected Sites Timeline species extinction plots for 6 sites across WRAP: –Spokane Indian Reservation, WA –Medicine Lake, MT (adjacent to Fort Peck) –Rocky Mountain NP, CO –Grand Canyon NP, AZ –Yosemite NP, CA –Crater Lake, OR

Mm -1 >>

Module A filter clogged – removed data from 2002 data set

Avg. extinction: 24.8 Mm -1 Avg. extinction: 48.9 Mm -1 Crater Lake Recon. Aerosol Extinction Comparison

Avg. extinction: 23.9 Mm -1 Avg. extinction: 24.8 Mm -1

Grand Canyon Recon. Aerosol Extinction Comparison Avg. extinction: 21.8 Mm -1 Avg. extinction: 23.4 Mm -1

Next Steps Conference call week of October 18 Working with RMC to transfer emission and TSSA data files to ARS Begin adding draft documents to the AoH web site (introductory materials first) Prepare samples of CIA reports on AoH web site (currently based on available data) Review agenda for November meeting