Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Advertisements

UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Continuing Accreditation 2005 Self-Study and Site Visit.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Institutional Accreditation: An Overview HLC Accreditation Kick-Off March 24, 2006.
WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES The Higher Learning Commission.
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Campus Forum on Institutional Accreditation HLC Team December 3, 2013.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Incorporating Student Engagement into the Accreditation Process April 11, 2010.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
North Central Association Higher Learning Commission Chair/Director Retreat August 14, 2012.
University-wide Accreditation Academic Leadership Program February 18, 2010.
TITLE HERE 1 UCB Steering Committee for Reaccreditation January 21, 2009.
CEPA Programs – Accrediting Concerns Presenters: Dr. Deborah Loper, Assistant Vice President of Institutional Effectiveness at Colorado Mountain College.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
Higher Learning Commission North Central Association Accreditation Visit April 2016.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Mission and Accreditation Strategic Planning Steering Committee March 9, 2009 Dr. Richard Beck.
UT Self Study Senior Leadership Retreat December 3, 2009 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of The University of Toledo is to improve the human condition; to.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
Prepared for New Faculty orientation August 15, 2012.
HLC Re-accreditation Update GENERAL FACULTY MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
UT Self Study All Criterion Teams Meeting Friday, November 13, :00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. SU 2582.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
HLC? What does this stand for? Who are they? What do they do?
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Accreditation Who does it? Why do it? How is it done?
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Accreditation Pathway
Pathways 2017: HLC Accreditation Overview
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Task Force Orientation
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation

Self Study Process Adapted from a presentation by Dr. John Taylor CSU NCA/HLC Liaison

The value of accreditation? provides both public certification of acceptable institutional quality and an opportunity and incentive for self- improvement. critical self-analysis leading to improvement in quality and for consultation and advice from persons from other organizations

NCA/HLC - What’s That? North Central Association — one of six regional accreditation associations in the U.S., since NCA includes institutions in 19 states. The Higher Learning Commission — the official name of the association, adopted in 2000.

The Commission’s Requirements of a Member Institution Conduct an Institution-wide Self- Study in the Context of the Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report Host an Evaluation Team

Fundamental Shifts from the previous criteria Inputs Teaching Focus on Past Autonomy Outcomes Learning Focus on Future Connectedness, Engagement & Service

2010 Self-study Involves Review of Progress on Earlier Concerns All accreditation requirements met in 2000 –“…the University continues to offer high- quality academic programs that respond to community needs” Two challenges required progress reports Accepted without reservations Good standing with Commission

Five areas to which we must respond in our self-study report. (Listed on your bookmark.) CORE CRITERIA

The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students. 1 - Mission & Integrity

The organization’s allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities. 2 - Preparing for the Future

The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission. 3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching

The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission. 4 - Acquisition, Discovery, & Application of Knowledge

As called for by its mission, the organization identifies its constituencies and serves them in ways both value. 5 - Engagement and Service

Hallmarks of An Effective Self-Study Process [HLC Handbook Chapter 5 found at our website] Fits the distinctive nature of the university Ensures effective evaluation of the whole university Produces evidence to show that the Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation and Core Components are met Promises to have an impact on the university beyond the Commission visit

Data Gathering Structure 5 Criteria 21 Core Components –Managed by Core Component Leader 182 “Evidence Examples” –1 or more individuals responsible

POINTS TO REMEMBER The primary purpose of the self-study report is to demonstrate that regular improvement has occurred at our institution, and that plans and planning processes are in place to ensure that it will continue to occur. Please note: “Mission” is not a single document. An institution's distinctiveness should be visible in the actions the institution undertakes as a result of that mission.

POINTS TO REMEMBER All of our material must be thorough, descriptive, and well-documented. Every criterion requires that we have proof of our achievements. We should distinguish our university with the examples we use. The examples we provide are our opportunities to showcase what distinguishes CSU from everyone else. *WE MAY BE COMING TO YOU FOR INFORMATION. PLEASE SUBMIT MATERIAL WHEN REQUESTED.

Timeline Phase 1 Orientation and Planning September/October 2008 (KICK OFF Sept. 11) Phase 2 Information Gathering and Analysis November 2008 – February 2009 Phase 3 Synthesis and Reporting February 2009 – May 2009 Phase 4 Integration and Dissemination Summer 2009 Phase 5 Dissemination, Feedback, Revision, and Submission August 2009 – January 2010

Site Visit March or April 2010 Visiting Team of 6 – 8 Resource Room made available –On campus and Virtual “On call” –Additional data –Special meetings with visiting team

What Is Your Role?  Provide information when requested in a timely manner.  Read and respond to the draft reports when asked, providing corrections, suggestions and additional material as appropriate.  Help prepare the campus and community for the team visit.  Keep informed about the process. Watch for regular updates.

KEEP INFORMED REGULARLY CHECK THE SELF-STUDY WEB SITE: s/selfstudy2010/ s/selfstudy2010/

Questions and Answers Extension 7499