Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems Don Kincaid, University of South Florida Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network.
Advertisements

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Coaching With Indistar Office of School Improvement.
Course Name Course Director: Course Coordinator: Course Preview.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Reciprocal Teaching.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
COURSE PREVIEW Course Name Course Director: Course Coordinator:
The Changing Waters of ASPIRE’ing Family Engagement Annual Parent Mentor Partnership Kickoff Conference September 11, 2014 The Classic Center, Athens,
College, Career, & Life Readiness The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, H323A However,
Day 2: SPDG Program Update Audrey Desjarlais Knowledge Mobilization Coordinator, Signetwork.
YOUR LOGO January 13, 2014 ALL Site Coaching Session.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Collaborative Data Teams
Delivering Learning Programs Facilitating work based learning.
Pat Mueller David Merves October 6, 2008 NH RESPONDS Evaluation Component.
MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Missouri SW-PBS Annual Reporting pbismissouri.org.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability New Charter Leaders Institute June 16-17, 2015 Valencia W. Davis, Consultant IDEA, Part B Programs NCDPI.
Linking Implementation Data to the SPDG’s PD Worksheet The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education,
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Staffing What training and resources do they need to work effectively with students? Are the right people doing the right work? How will you know that.
College, Career, & Life Readiness The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, H323A However,
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Gary L. Cates, Ph.D. Illinois State University Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education State Personnel Development Grant – Illinois U.S. Department.
Data Use Professional Development Series Day The contents of this slideshow were developed under a Race.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
The 2012 SPDG Cohort Kick-off Webinar Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. SPDG Program Lead Audrey Desjarlais Signetwork Lead Leslie Crysler Signetwork Staff October.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A However,
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Ronald J. Tomalis, Secretary of EducationCarolyn.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Iowa’s SPDG/SSIP Alignment March Who is collaborating? Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids (C4K) Pre-K K-3 Assistive technology Significant Disabilities.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Effective Meeting Practices November, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of.
“Culturally Responsive Practices, Inclusive Practices and Family Engagement” Monica Ballay, M.Ed. Quality Indicators:
The Missouri—Show Me Outcomes Story. Missouri Integrated Model (2007 SPDG)
Creating Alternative Pathways for Students to Achieve Academic Credit in School The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US.
Child Outcomes Measurement and Data Quality Abby Winer Schachner & Kathleen Hebbeler International Society on Early Intervention Conference Stockholm,
Essentials Understanding connections between foundations and all practice topics (impact for supporting academic and social behavioral progress) Foundations:
Participant Handouts Tier 1 Assessment/Data Systems Tier 1 Grade Level/Department Data Teams For External Coaches The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Page 1: Five Ws and One H of Credentialing Column 1 School Year Cohort 1 Year 1 (Pilot Year) Column 2 School Year Cohort 1 Year 2 Cohort.
Teaming at Tier 2: Collaborative, Effective, & Efficient Teams September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Assessing High Quality Professional Development BY: MONICA BALLAY |
Supporting All Teachers for All Students: SATFAS
Professional Development: Evaluation Strategies to Maximize Impact
SSIP Implementation: Alignment & Evaluation Across the State System
Technical Assistance Innovation Coaching for Practice Change Learning Lab Terri Enters, WI Birth to Three Program, Part C Supervisor and Coordinator Lisa.
Consultant Log Data Entry Review
High Quality Coaching: How Do We Know It? April 1, 2015
SAPSI-S PEP Overview I-RtI Network December, 2012
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Statewide System of Support Foundational Services April 2015 Illinois State Board of Education In Collaboration with Regional Offices of Education/Intermediate.
Driving Change in Transition Practices
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Montana’s PPT Template
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
2019 OSEP Leadership Conference
APR Informational Webinar
Instruments for Measuring High Quality PD Denise Andreski & Elaine Pierrel Maryland SPDG Evaluators This suite of tools was developed to evaluate the extent.
A Parent (Center) at the Table: Building SEA & IHE Collaborations
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (#H323A120018). However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Professional Development to Practice State Implementation Specialist Purpose & Role

Professional Development to Practice Purpose The State Implementation Specialist supports the regional implementation of high quality, fidelity-driven professional development through a process of coaching and feedback.

Professional Development to Practice What is HQPD?  High Quality Professional Development is measured using compiled, research-identified indicators on the observation checklists for High Quality Professional Development Trainings and High Quality Implementation Coachings.  High quality is defined as receiving no more than one indicator not observed within each heading of the HQPD Training Checklist or receiving no less than 11 of the 12 items on the Coaching Checklist.

Professional Development to Practice SPDG Requirements (1) At least 20% of SPDG-delivered trainings and coachings is observed by SPDG Implementation Support Personnel (external grant evaluators at KU) and/or State Implementation Specialists to ensure that the delivery meets the criteria for high quality professional development. The SPDG grant evaluators will be involved in recording fidelity of implementation at both the process and content levels.

Professional Development to Practice 20% Defined 20% of all training and 20% of all coaching sessions provided by the RPDC to a CW building that addresses any of the areas of Collaborative Work will be observed by the CW-State Implementation Specialist. A building can be a CW building AND a PLC/PBS fee for service. PD provided as fee for service is not checked for fidelity.

Professional Development to Practice All consultants who are observed using the HQPD Training and Coaching Checklists will receive timely feedback through a feedback conversation. Timely=Within 2 weeks SPDG Requirements (2)

Professional Development to Practice Recommended Feedback Process 1.SIS observes training/coaching and records fidelity notes. 2.SIS enters observation notes to online form to be forwarded to PD Provider. 3.PD Provider self-reflects using the HQPD Training or Coaching checklist and makes notes. 4.PD Provider compares SIS notes with self-reflections. 5.The SIS & PD Provider discuss observation notes and collaboratively develop next steps for delivering HQPD or Coaching experience. This feedback conference should occur “later but timely”--not in the training context and not while learners are present.

Professional Development to Practice SIS Expectations  The SIS is an observer, not a trainer.  The SIS honors the relationship between the PD provider and the audience. (Co-training with RPDC consultant & SIS should not occur.)  The SIS may sit-in on the training team/ PD providers coaching conversations. They should not facilitate the coaching conversation, but they may add to their notes on the HQPD Checklist or Coaching Checklist.  The SIS and PD providers may have coaching conversations face to face or virtually.

Professional Development to Practice Each participating RPDC consultant is observed at least four times annually. SPDG Requirements (3) RPDC consultant providing support in CW schools. 2 observations of training AND 2 observations of coaching Annual = RPDC fiscal year

Professional Development to Practice SPDG Requirements (4) All training and coaching observations are compiled and summarized and results shared with the RPDC consultant and RPDC Director.  RPDC consultants will receive their personal feedback.  RPDC Directors will receive a regional anonymous summary.

Professional Development to Practice Questions? Contact Information: Phone Number