Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June Describing sub-national SDIs François Salgé member of EUROGI Executive Committee member of AFIGéO Executive Committee

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Content Methodology for describing SDI ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs Reporting results Some results from France Conclusion

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 eSDI-Net+ Methodology for describing SDI Sub-national SDI identity card SDI usage assessment Networking people assessment Socio-economic impact analysis Organisational assessment Coping with legal aspects Technical functionalities-facilities-components Geoportal assessment 15 questions 14 questions 10 questions 9 questions 12 questions 6 questions 28 questions 12 questions More? See: Methodology for describing sub-national SDI, eSDI-Net+ eSDI-Net+ consortium documentation

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Procedure used in identifying and analysing sub-national best practices Identfication of existing sub national SDIs Preselection of promising SDI solutions Personal interwies with SDIs managers Analysis of the SDI solution based on me'thodology National worshops

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 National workshops France Italy South-East Europe Hungary Czech republic and Slovakia Germany and Switzerland Scandinavia Poland Romenia UK and Ireland Portugal and Spain Belgium and the Netherlands

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs: AFIGéO way ‏ Phase 1: initialisation [summer 2008] Database development Populating database with desktop information Phase 2: interviews of sub-national SDI officers [Sept-Dec 2008] Filled-in form sent to interviewed person Phone discussion (at least once for 2 hours) ‏ Written summary sent for approval Update Database and finalise form Phase 3: cross analysis [Dec 2008-January 2009] Analysis of each question Slide-show for each of the 8 categories defined in the methodology Phase 4: synthesis [Feb 2009]

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs : Cross analysis (2/3) ‏ Step 1: preparation Creation of a database populated by the forms Step 2: analysis For each question Identification of similarities and differences between answers Typify answers Creation of pie charts or histograms or "shopping lists" Realisation of a slide show for each category

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 ESDI-Net+ Process for evaluating sub-national SDIs (3/3) ‏ Identification of the questions for which the answers provide a list of possible items as a “shopping list” for Sub-national SDI or can be ordered from “low-level” to “high level” or are of importance for a European synthesis For each of the categories 2 to 7 1 paragraph description of main findings for each question that are of importance for a European view For each question for which the answers can be ordered Assign a quote for each sub-national SDI Assign a weight Compute a final quote for further use in the radar-chart Provision of reaction to the process from interviewed people

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Reporting results (1/2) ‏ Raw material Verbatim of interviews (database and forms) 400 pages Spreadsheet populated by form answers Spreadsheets for question analysis (100 sheets) ‏ Deliverables Slide-show for each category (100 pages) ‏ Cross-analysis (per methodology topics) 40 pages +charts Summary (in French and English) 10 pages + charts

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Reporting results (2/2) ‏ Sub-NSDI typology and progress characterisation Progress of data sharing (reference data, thematic data) ‏ Openness towards stakeholders Legal backing (legal structure and funding) ‏ Possible "trajectories" as time is concerned: Are Sub-NSDI following the same setting up process?

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Some results from France: Verbatim of interviews

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Some results: database

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Some results: Slide-show for each category

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Some results: Cross-analysis (1/3) ‏

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Some results from France: Cross-analysis (2/3) ‏

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Some results: Evaluation criteria (3/3) ‏ Five main criteria SDI « size » (quantity) SDI « quality » (meeting user requirements) ‏ Co-operation and subsidiarity Sustainability Users usability 32 indicators Quantitative Qualitative

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Conclusion: return on investmment Knowledge Database and fact sheet Building the network of SDI people National GI association identified as “network entry point” In own country At European level and in other European countries EUROGI members benefited from EUROGI involvement in the project Best practice award

Workshop 3.4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices from GI-SDI Projects ROTTERDAM, 15 June 2009 Best practice award