Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Connecting the Three OSEP Family Outcomes with IFSP Outcomes and Local Practices Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Connie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Using outcomes data for program improvement Kathy Hebbeler and Cornelia Taylor Early Childhood Outcome Center, SRI International.
Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute American Institutes for Research PACER Center University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Disabilities Presentation.
Developmentally Appropriate Practice
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Best Start Conference January Peel Health Great Beginnings Initiative  In 1999, McCain and Mustard’s Early Years Study documented the importance.
Data Analysis for Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data 1.
Effective support: working with others Effective support: working with others A Twilight Training Session by Gareth D Morewood, Director of Curriculum.
Implementing Values through Community Action Research Dr Josephine Bleach
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Using data for program improvement Early Childhood Outcomes Center1.
Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak May, 2011.
Teaching Adults to Teach Children about Food Safety Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Components of Quality Program Assessment Tools.  “Inclusion has legal status in legislation mandating educational services for all children with disabilities.
Moving From Parts to a Whole Tools That Unite Partners Around A Whole Child Vision Youth in the Middle Jessica Cameron Project Manager, Whole Child Initiative.
New Voices/Nuevas Voces Program: Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in Early Childhood Education and Intervention Betsy Ayankoya Dina Castro.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Welcome to Unit 6 Communicating and Collaborating: Family Involvemen Nicole McGuire CE240-4.
Parental Involvement: English Language Learners By: Alina Fortes.
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
University of Leeds Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity Network The Globe Centre, Accrington 22 nd September 2005.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Family & Professional Networks in Disability Policy: A Qualitative Inquiry.
Wausau School District Creating Future-Focused Schools Community Resource Committee Review of Engagement Data April 12, 2007.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Using COS Data to Inform Program Improvement at All Levels Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and nurture.
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
What the data can tell us: Evidence, Inference, Action! 1 Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
C4EO – Ways of Working Heather Rushton, Planning and Performance 1.
How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI.
Making the Connection: Engaging Families to Improve Outcomes for Students with Disabilities NCSI/Cross State Learning Collaborative
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
STRONG FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS CENTRAL TO EFFECTIVE SCHOOL REFORM Jan Patterson and Ann Bliss Smarter Schools National Partnerships Key Reform.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Including Parents In Alaska Child Outcomes. Alaska Child Outcomes Development Summer 2005 – General Supervision Enhancement Grant (GSEG) Infant & Toddler.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
Looking at Data Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center
EIA: Using data for program improvement
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Using Data for Program Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Connecting the Three OSEP Family Outcomes with IFSP Outcomes and Local Practices Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Connie Hawkins, PTAC at ECAC July 2010

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center2 Session Focus: Using data to understand where improvements might be made Connecting improvement activities to provider skills and practices Practices to support improving family outcomes

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center3 Using data for improvement E vidence I nference A ction

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center4 Evidence Evidence refers to the numbers, such as “89% of families reported that EI services helped them know their rights” The numbers are not debatable

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center5 Inference How do you interpret the #s? What can you conclude from the #s? Does evidence mean good news? Bad news? News we can’t interpret? To reach an inference, sometimes we analyze data in other ways (ask for more evidence)

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center6 Action Given the inference from the numbers, what should be done? Recommendations or action steps Action can be debatable – and often is Another role for stakeholders

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center7 Program improvement: At the state level – TA, policy At the regional or local level – supervision, guidance At the service level– implement high quality individualized family centered services At the family level-

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center8 Key points Evidence refers to the numbers and the numbers by themselves are meaningless Inference is attached by those who read (interpret) the numbers You have the opportunity and obligation to attach meaning

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center9 Continuous Program Improvement Plan (vision) Program characteristics Child and family outcomes Implement Check (Collect and analyze data) Reflect Are we where we want to be?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center10 Tweaking the System Plan (vision) Program characteristics Child and family outcomes Implement Check (Collect and analyze data) Reflect Are we where we want to be? Is there a problem? Why is it happening? What should be done? Is it being done? Is it working?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center11 Outcome questions for program improvement, e.g. Do outcomes vary by Region of the state? Level of functioning at entry? Services received? Age at entry to service? Type of services received? Family outcomes? Education level of parent?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center12 Looking at Family Outcomes by Subgroups Local programs Family Characteristics Child Characteristics Service Characteristics

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center13 Are there differences in outcomes across local programs?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center14 Are there differences in outcomes across family characteristics? Race/ethnicity Family income Primary language Family structure

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center15 Are there differences in outcomes across family race/ethnicity?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center16 Are there differences in outcomes across family primary language?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center17 Are there differences in outcomes across child characteristics? Race/ethnicity Type of disability Length of time in services Etc.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center18 Are there differences in outcomes across child type of disability?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center19 Examples of process questions Are ALL services high quality? Are ALL children and families receiving ALL the services they should in a timely manner? Are ALL families being supported in being involved in their child’s program? What are the barriers to high quality services?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center20 Working Assumptions There are some high quality services and programs being provided across the state. There are some families who are not getting the highest quality services. If we can find ways to improve those services/programs, these families will experience better outcomes.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center21 Action Given the inference from the numbers, what should be done? Develop improvement activities that are: Targeted based on data analysis Based on evidence based practices Interconnected, work together to accomplish the desired result

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center22 Action How can EI services help families: Knowing their rights Effectively communicating their child’s needs Helping their child develop and learn

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Early Childhood Outcomes Center23 How are the 3 global outcomes connected to what providers and families do every day? Are families aware that EI is intended to accomplish these outcomes? Do providers develop IFSPs that will ensure the accomplishment of the three outcomes? Are families supported in ways that enable their participation in IFSP development and service delivery?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes I don’t know who it is, but the author of these “easy-to-assemble” instructions should be severely punished!

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Research is beginning to provide more information on how to use data to develop practices designed to support improving family outcomes We are also learning that certain demographics such as parents of minority children and single adult households report lower outcomes ( Bailey et al., 2005)

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Use data to develop a clear definition of WHO is in your program, community and state

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes What Do the Numbers Tell Us? Look at Evidence and Inference Growth Trends and Demographic Changes are also Important

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Nationwide, 43% of Infants and Toddlers Receiving Part C Services are Non-White, including 13% Black and 24% Hispanic In NC, That Number is 49% with 27% Black and 18% Hispanic Children

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Also Consider: Poverty Literacy and education Age of Parents Culture/Language Religion Education

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Use Data to Understand Where Improvements Might be Needed Do family outcomes seem to be influenced by demographics? Are unique strategies and supports available based on family needs? Do demographics identify a “trend” or developing issue that needs to be addressed? Do providers have opportunities to learn new skills and practices? How is knowledge of effective practices for working with families including those from diverse backgrounds routinely provided to providers?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Are disability communities, and parent organizations used as resources? Do families and other stakeholders have opportunities to provide program feedback and input? Does professional development for staff and providers include discussion of “old” definitions and stereotypes?

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes For Example: Long Standing definition of “Home and Family” is centered on: A “single space” as the home of the child “biological heterosexual parents” as the responsible caregivers

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Today, Researchers and Scholars Recognize the Discrepancy Between that Definition and Fact However, Political, religious and service providing organizations continue to argue that the traditional definition of family “matters” and should be the basis for program planning

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Use Your Data and Answers to Create an Improvement Plan or Revise an Existing One Connect the activities to provider skills and practices. The family structures in your communities and programs should also inform the development of your activities

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes

Learn About and Implement Effective Practices for Helping Families Know their rights Effectively communicate their child’s needs Help their child develop and learn

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Most Families Have Access to Information from MANY Sources and find “Knowledge to Action” Strategies Extremely Useful Knowledge funneling Materials produced at local, state and national levels Strategies that include “non written access to information” Support to develop skills If appropriate, show connection of information, outcomes, and IFSP

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes The Transmission Approach Knowledge emanates from an authority is not effective in working on family outcomes The Transaction Approach Cooperative interactions between educator / service provider and parent works

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Instruction not Instructions!

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Concrete Examples Videos Modeling Hand-over-hand Peer to Peer

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Use Resources from Parent Centers and TA & D Network

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Families are More Engaged with Programs that Respect and Collaborate with their Other Sources of Support and Information Community organizations can serve as a “reference” Provide information and encouragement to families and cultural mediators Educate personnel about cultures and family strengths and challenges Reinforce activities Provide volunteers to help support families

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Technology Can be an Important Tool Flip Video “mini” camcorder translation program such as “traduce al hora” Blogs Twitter Website Internet based calendars

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Leadership Activities can Provide Opportunities to Learn, Practice Skills and Reinforce Family Outcomes Leadership training Boards and committees Input and evaluation Professional development Parent mentors/support

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Families report the importance of opportunities to network with other families

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Connect the Dots Connect outcomes and effective strategies to the IFSP process Families find benefit in being told about outcomes and understanding how IFSP contents and program activities and services relate to outcomes

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes In Surveys and Interviews Used to Prepare for this Session 33% said IFSP did not include goals that addressed my needs as a parent 33% said they did not know about family outcomes

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Comments Reported Frustration With: Lack of information in areas that could be related to outcomes including the IFSP process Not getting information about other resources and programs – one parent suggested a “slower paced” meeting for parents to explain resources, organizations and programs.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes One parent said “feeding” was not addressed even though it was the family’s top priority. There was a suggestion to give families small amounts of information at a time. Often but not too frequently.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Starting a “virtual” parent group was suggested as a way to empower families and improve family outcomes without overwhelming families. A parent of two young children remarked that knowing about the outcomes and using them on the IFSP might have helped her organize and prioritize her needs.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Maximize the IFSP process by clearly relating the goals and activities to specific outcomes and allowing families choices. Support Instruction with peer and community supports and activities if needed.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Make sure the IFSP process uses a BROAD definition of family. Build outcome related activities into the operation of your program or state initiatives.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes

I have gone to get myself. If I return before I get back, hold me here because it is important I see myself when I get back before I get confused.

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Your Job is Important to Children and Families

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes

Exceptional Children’s Assistance Center 907 Barra Row Suites Davidson, NC