Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Ocean Service Budget Update for the NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel Glenn Boledovich, Chief NOS Policy, Planning and Analysis Division.
Advertisements

Assistant Administrator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service September 18, 2008 John H. Dunnigan Toward National Height.
HA-NDGPS: Opportunities in an Open Landscape Jim Arnold Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations Research and Development.
GRAV-D Gravity for the Re-definition of the American Vertical Datum
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
2015 Height Modernization Partner Meeting April 14, 2015.
1 GPS and GNSS Activities in Hong Kong Simon C W KWOK Geodetic Survey Section Lands Department Hong Kong 35th Civil GPS Service Interface Committee Fairfax,
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Said El Said ITS Program Manager Traffic Operations Division.
45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in.
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
AUSPOS Online GPS Processing Service John Manning, John Dawson.Ramesh Govind Geoscience Australia.
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
Using Aerogravity to Produce a Refined Vertical Datum D.R. Roman and X. Li XXV FIG Congress June 2014 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Session TS01A, Paper.
UAV for Surveyors and Spatial Analysts An emerging technology for the Geospatial Industry Warren Eade– Mapping and Mobile Manager.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad.
OPUS Projects (beta) status and plans Improved solutions for simultaneous or repeated observations harvest data from multiple observers share upload &
NGS HSRP Update Ronnie Taylor, Acting Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA October 13, 2010.
NOAA Airborne Platforms n Mission Related – All NOAA airborne platforms perform some type of dedicated task defined by NOAAs mission n Not for General.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
GPS and Geodetic News You Can Use David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State of Ohio National Geodetic Survey, NOAA 2008 Ohio GIS Conference September.
Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.
2010 Hydrographic Services Review Panel David Steele, PLS DNR Geodetic Survey Director & Spatial Reference Center of Washington.
Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical: GRAV-D Anchorage, Alaska February 22, Alaska Surveying and Mapping Conference Renee.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
The Texas Shoreline Change Project: The Texas Shoreline Change Project: Combining Lidar, Historical Photography, and Ground Surveys to Measure Shoreline.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
National Geodetic Survey Programs & Geodetic Tools William Stone Southwest Region Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
Operations and Analysis Division Field Operations Branch Norfolk, VA.
AEC Summit NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Update Brian Shaw Geodesist.
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
The GRAV-D Project and The Future of NAD 83 and NAVD 88 A briefing for FEMA leadership Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey.
National Geodetic Survey 101 Brett Howe Geodetic Services Division Chief 28 June, 2013 geodesy.noaa.gov.
National Spatial Reference System: Present and Future Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
New Vertical Datum: plans, status, GRAV-D update FGCS San Diego, CA. July 11, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Vicki Childers National Geodetic Survey GRAV-D: The Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum ACSM 2009 Workshop.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.
2015 International Great Lakes Datum Height Modernization Project Dave Rigney NGS Geodetic Advisor Michigan Great Lakes Region Height.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Height Modernization in the U.S.: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey, U.S.A.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting Neil D. Weston National Geodetic Survey, NOS, NOAA Silver Spring, MD July 30, 2013.
Towards Optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS OCTOBER 9, 2014 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S.
GRAV-D G ravity for the R e-definition of the A merican V ertical D atum Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, State Advisor Branch 1315 East West Highway, RM 9557 Silver.
National Geodetic Survey Update Hydrographic Services Review Panel Honolulu, HI May 4, 2011 Juliana Blackwell Director National Geodetic Survey.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Upcoming replacements for NAD83, NAVD88 and IGLD85 Dru Smith, NGS Richard Snay, NGS Thomas Landon, NGS.
National Height Modernization Eastern Regional Meeting March 4, 2014 Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) Neil D. Weston National Geodetic.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting 11 January 2011 Ronnie Taylor Acting Director,
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
Update on National Geodetic Survey Activities Joe Evjen, NGS 02 May 2006.
Guidelines for Real Time GNSS Networks (RTN) Administration.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U. S
Presentation transcript:

Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b. Surveying, Mapping, and Geosciences Session

Aerial Surveying All types of aircraft (helicopter, fixed wing, balloon, UAS) Many tools for surveying, mapping, and geosciences. – Photogrammetry, (Topo-Bathy) LIDAR, Gravity, Magnetics, Hyperspectral or Multispectral, Radiometric, etc. Advantages: Cover a lot of ground quickly and with consistent sampling Positioning is crucial!

Critical to U.S. National Geodetic Survey’s (NGS’) mission to define, maintain, and provide access to the U.S. National Spatial Reference System Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) 2007 – 2022 (9 years remaining) Airborne Gravity Snapshot Target: 2 cm accuracy orthometric heights Coastal Mapping Program Photogrammetry and Topo-Bathy LIDAR Emergency Response Imagery NGS Airborne Programs

Positioning High-altitude, high-speed, long duration flights for gravimetry Low-altitude, slow-speed, short duration for coastal mapping Traditionally, Differential Single Baseline or Differential Network Consecutive epochs at 1 Hz required Inertial measurements for aircraft orientations IMU GPS Antenna Instrumentation CORS

Differential Positioning and CORS Two GRAV-D surveys completed in 2008/2009 Puerto Rico and Virgin IslandsLouisiana

Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge Louisiana 2008 Two days Altitude: 35k ft. (~10 km) Longest Baseline: 400 km Flight Time: 3.5 Hours Network and Single Baseline Differential positions are equivalent, no matter which station is used as the base Precise Point Positioning (PPP) is equivalent New Orleans Post- Processing Not Applicable to Low-Altitude

Immediate Positioning PPP cannot be used for immediate processing of airborne data, since it requires precise IGS ephemeris (Lag time: 12 days) For quality control during a survey, you must have one or more bases. How many? Where located? For rapid response or easy logistics, can you use one? Single point of failure; high risk for long duration missions; Use CORS as a backup station

Causes of GPS Failures at Airports Jamming Occlusions Other broadcasts Hardware breaks Batteries don’t last Data card fails Human error

UAS Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) of great interest to surveying and mapping in U.S. Logistically desirable- less equipment, less personnel, less fuel Fast, easy deployment In-field quality control without setting up your own base stations would be advantageous- can CORS support that?

High-Rate CORS Available Now 1 Hz data rate necessary Restriction for use as a base station in airborne positioning: Located within ~15 km of the airport Pros: Managed, permanent site; low effort Cons: No control over quality and continuity ~670 1s stations in network Concentrated in eastern 1/3 of U.S. and West Coast

Map of Operational 1s CORS

Co-location with airports

Conclusions Airborne positioning for geoscience applications benefits from the co-location of high-rate CORS with U.S. airports With potential increase in UAS surveying, low-effort and rapid aerial deployments are of continuing interest Over most of the U.S., airborne operators currently have to run at least 1 of their own base stations. Some places (like Wichita, KS) are CORS-ready for rapid deployment. NGS Programs Information: – Contact: – Dr. Theresa Damiani