Quality Annual Assurance Report 2005 What you believe is what you achieve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3 through 8 and 11 September 6, 2007 For Haddonfield Public Schools.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District.
Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
PSSA and the Girard School District An analysis of the 2009 results and their implications. Katrina Johnston ED520INA.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
Contemporary Issues October 20, Technology Report Presentations Introducing…… 1. Sarah!!!! 2. Allison!!!! Clap! Clap! Clap! Applause!!!!
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.
District Assessment Report School Year.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Adequate Yearly Progress Report August 2009.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Michigan School Report Card Update
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Quality Annual Assurance Report 2005 What you believe is what you achieve.

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND N.C.L.B.

NCLB: Every child is entitled to... Adequate Yearly Progress (A.Y.P.) Safe Schools Highly Qualified Teachers (H.Q.T.)

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) èGoal is 100% proficiency by June 2014 for all children. èState has set AYP benchmarks for each year from now until then.

NJ AYP Standards to Year 2014

New Jersey’s AYP Standards for 2005 to 2007

What is reported?  Scores are reported at grades 4, 8, & 11.  Schools must meet AYP or show a 10% decrease in # failing (NJ Safe Harbor).  Scores are reported by total population & subgroups

What is reported? Sub Groups:  Total Population  Students with Disabilities  Limited Income  Limited English Proficient  Economically Disadvantaged  White  African-American  American Indian/Native American  Hispanic  Other  Subgroups of less than 20 are not reported.  Subgroup of ‘students with disabilities’ must be over 35.

How does the community know how its students are doing? ðAnnual meetings of Planning Teams in each school-- fall and spring. ðAnnual presentation of the Quality Assurance Report in October.

NCLB: Things worth noting 95% Test Participation AYP increase Bundling 3&4 Grades 5, 6, 7 Pilots this year Not analyzed

PURPOSES of the QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT F Measure Results F Set Goals F Report to the Public F Report to the State

QAAR Required Items FSchool Plans FAchievement of Performance Objectives FNJ School Report Cards FProfessional Dev. Activities FCondition of Facilities FViolence & Vandalism Data FStatus of Mandated Program Reviews FCommunity Support FAssignment Plan for Certified Nurses FStatements of Assurance

School Plans: District SMART Goals Process S = Specific M = Measurable A = Attainable R = Results-Oriented T = Time-Bound

Over-Arching Goal By All students will demonstrate proficiency in reading and mathematics.

District Target Goal for New Jersey Assessments Each sub-group will attain or surpass the “Adequate Yearly Progress” standards set by the N.J. Department of Education.

South Brunswick Public Schools October 2005 District Literacy & Math Results Grades 4, 8, & 11 Spring 2003 to 2005

Bird’s Eye View All Students Tested in Grades 4, 8, and 11

Math & Literacy NJ Assessments 2005 (All Students) Passing Rates

Cohort View

Math & Literacy for Grades 3 to to 2005 Same Cohort (All Students Tested)

Grade 4

Grade 4 Literacy: 2003 to AYP = 75% AYP = 68% Passing Rates

Grade 4 Math: 2003 to AYP = 62% AYP = 53% Passing Rates

Grade 4 Literacy by Ethnicity NJASK 2003 to AYP = 68% AYP = 75% Passing Rates

Grade 4 Math by Ethnicity NJASK 2003 to AYP = 53% AYP = 62% Passing Rates

Grade 8

Grade 8 Literacy: 2003 to AYP = 66% AYP = 58% Passing Rates

Grade 8 Math: 2003 to AYP = 49% AYP = 39% Passing Rates

Grade 8 Literacy by Ethnicity GEPA 2003 to AYP = 58% AYP = 66% Passing Rates

Grade 8 Math by Ethnicity GEPA 2003 to AYP = 39% AYP = 49% Passing Rates

Grade 11

Grade 11 Literacy 2003 to AYP = 79% AYP = 73% Passing Rates

Grade 11 Math: 2003 to AYP = 64% AYP = 55% Passing Rates

Grade 11 Literacy by Ethnicity HSPA 2003 to AYP = 73% AYP = 79% Passing Rates

Grade 11 Math by Ethnicity HSPA 2003 to AYP = 55% AYP = 64% Passing Rates

Our Schools Brooks Crossing Brunswick Acres Cambridge Constable Greenbrook Indian Fields Monmouth Junction Crossroads North Middle School Crossroads South Middle School South Brunswick High School No S.B. schools in the State category, “In Need of Improvement.”

Our Schools Brooks Crossing Brunswick Acres Cambridge Constable Greenbrook Indian Fields* Monmouth Junction Crossroads North Middle School* Crossroads South Middle School* South Brunswick High School* *Early Warning

SAT Results

Verbal Mean Scores for % of Class Took SAT!

SBHS Verbal Scores 2002 to % of Class Took SAT!

Math Mean Scores for % of Class Took SAT!

SBHS Math Scores 2002 to % of Class Took SAT!

SBHS Combined Mean Scores for Classes of 2002 to % of Class Took SAT!

Violence & Vandalism Report 2002 to 2005

District Incidents for 2002 to 2005

Ingredients for Success... Safe & Caring Environment High Academic Standards Rich & Varied Curriculum Sound Pedagogy Highly Qualified & Well Trained Staff

Ingredients for Success... FInstructional Leadership FWell-Maintained Facilities FAdequate Resources FParents as Partners FStrong Community Support

And the final ingredient for success-- high expectations. “What you believe… is what you achieve.”