Alabama Extended Standards & Body of Evidence Marla Davis Holbrook & Susan Skipper Fall Leadership Conference August 17, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Alternate Portfolio Assessment II (DAPA)
Advertisements

Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Understanding the IEP Process
Georgia Alternate Assessment Understanding the Basics of the GAA GAA Blueprint and Portfolio Components Terminology for the GAA Descriptions and Examples.
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
I Think I Can, I Think I Can, I Know I Can, I Know I Can I Knew You Could! Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA) Refresher Course Peggy Windham Elizabeth.
NCSC- National Center and State Collaborative Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
1 Alignment of Alternate Assessments to Grade-level Content Standards Brian Gong National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Claudia.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Assessing Student Learning
June 2014 “College and Career Readiness” for Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities 1.
1 Alabama Alternate Assessment Alabama State Department of Education Regional Workshops Fall 2007.
FROM THE BEGINNING March 16, 2013 Peggy Windham, Presenter 1.
Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA)…
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Principles of Assessment
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Activities Virginia Department of Education Alternative Assessments Administrator’s Update Workshop August 2007.
NCSC Project Description
Strand A In Depth Context and Introduction. Strand A: Instruction Demonstrates your competency in instruction based on your documentation of NM Teacher.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
Alternate Assessment Changes. 9/14/20152 Important Information that You Need to Know The new Alternate Assessment will be a test given to students.
Practical Ideas On Alternative Assessment For ESL Students Jo-Ellen Tannenbaum, Montgomery County Public Schools (MD)
TPAC - Task 2 By Dora L. Bailey, An analysis of the effects of teaching on students’ learning (the “so what”) Video Tape should : 2.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
A major shift in Alabama’s curriculum to better prepare our students for post-secondary life (i.e. life after school). 1.Beginning this school year ( )
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Alabama Alternate Assessment
Target Audience  This Presentation is intended for teachers who are teaching at grade levels responsible for Standards of Learning testing.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Science Curriculum Guide Grades K-12 Marla Davis Holbrook Special Education Services Fall Leadership 2006.
Virginia Alternate Assessment Program Collection of Evidence Virginia Department of Education Alternate Assessment Administrators’ Update Workshop.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
1 VAAP Virginia Alternate Assessment Program. 2 Virginia Alternate Assessment Program The Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) is designed to.
Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.
Chapter 6 Curriculum-Based Classroom Assessment Techniques.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
+ PPBOCES Leadership Team: Corridor Training October 2015 Digging Deeper into evaluation, eligibility and IEP Development IEP: Present Levels IEP: Service.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Tier 3 Intervention The Most Intense Level of Intervention!!!
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
The IEP: Progress Monitoring Process. Session Agenda Definition Rationale Prerequisites The Steps of Progress Monitoring 1.Data Collection –Unpack Existing.
Closing the Educational Gap for Students with Disabilities Kristina Makousky.
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment
American Institutes for Research
Quarterly Meeting Focus
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
North Carolina Read to Achieve
LINKS Peer to Peer Support Program
CHAPTER 2: Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Exceptional Lives 8th Edition Turnbull, Turnbull,
TAPTM System Overview Teacher Excellence Student Achievement
Presentation transcript:

Alabama Extended Standards & Body of Evidence Marla Davis Holbrook & Susan Skipper Fall Leadership Conference August 17, 2006

Federal Legislation & State Response  Federal legislation mandates: State content standards State content standards Access to the general curriculum for all students Access to the general curriculum for all students Participation of all students in state assessments Participation of all students in state assessments

Federal Legislation & State Response  State response : Content standards listed in Alabama Courses of Study Content standards listed in Alabama Courses of Study All content standards must be taught and tested All content standards must be taught and tested State assessments measure achievement of content standards State assessments measure achievement of content standards For students with significant cognitive disabilities For students with significant cognitive disabilities Teacher task force developed the Alabama Extended Standards (linked to state content standards) Teacher task force developed the Alabama Extended Standards (linked to state content standards) Alabama Alternate Assessment measures achievement of the Alabama Extended Standards Alabama Alternate Assessment measures achievement of the Alabama Extended Standards

Student Achievement & Accountability State Assessment StateStandardsParticipants Alabama Reading and Math Test (ARMT) Alabama Content Standards Most students including students with disabilities, with or without accommodations Alabama High School Graduation Exam (AHSGE) Alabama Content Standards Most students including students with disabilities, with or without accommodations Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA) Alabama Extended Standards Students with significant cognitive disabilities

Changes in Curriculum & Assessment Then…Now… No required content for students with significant cognitive disabilities Students with significant cognitive disabilities must be taught and tested using grade level Alabama Extended Standards Functional curriculum and academic curriculum seen as an either/or choice Functional and academic skills are blended in the curriculum Students with significant cognitive disabilities were assessed on IEP goals/benchmarks by the IEP Team Students with significant cognitive disabilities are assessed on Alabama Extended Standards based on a body of evidence submitted to a third party

Alabama Extended Standards  The Alabama Extended Standards are the courses of study for students with significant cognitive disabilities who participate in the Alabama Alternate Assessment.

Teaching Alabama Extended Standards  All Alabama Extended Standards for the student’s grade of enrollment must be taught and tested.  Materials used for teaching Alabama Extended Standards and documenting performance should be age appropriate.  Materials are age appropriate if a same age peer without a disability would use something similar.

Monitoring Student Progress  Student performance should be continuously measured.  Classroom instruction should be driven by the results of ongoing student progress monitoring.

Body of Evidence  A variety of evidence must be collected on each Alabama Extended Standard throughout the academic year.  Teachers will select the items most representative of student performance for inclusion in the body of evidence.

Body of Evidence  The Body of Evidence includes a variety of products that illustrate student achievement on each Alabama Extended Standard for the grade level of enrollment.  A Body of Evidence may include actual student work, captioned photographs, videotapes, audiotapes, data charts, and graphs.

Documenting Student Performance  Evidence must document the student’s demonstration of knowledge and skills while attempting a given task.  Teacher lesson plans, teaching materials, and classroom schedules DO NOT document student performance.  Entries into the body of evidence that document only when and/or how a skill was taught will be given a score of zero.

Collecting Evidence  Documentation must be clear, readable, and easily interpreted by a third party.  Record the date, standard, and a brief description as each piece of evidence is collected.  Evidence should not include unidentifiable materials, inaudible tapes, or unreadable copies.

Collecting Evidence  Evidence must clearly relate to the standard.  The link between the evidence and the extended standard must be clear. For example, tracing and coloring measure fine motor skills, and are not evidence of academic performance.

Submitting the Body of Evidence  The body of evidence will be sent to a third party for evaluation.  The evidence alone will determine the scores on the AAA.  Teachers will not have an opportunity to explain or clarify evidence once it is submitted.

Submitting the Body of Evidence  Documentation submitted as part of the body of evidence must stand on its own.  Evidence stands on it own if persons unfamiliar with the student can look at the submitted documentation and draw consistent conclusions related to student performance.