FCAT Science High School Test – Grade 11 How did this happen? Why didn’t I know?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Gateway and End of Course 2007.
Advertisements

FY2006 FCAT Results. Reading Grade 3 FCAT SSS Reading Percent Level 1 All Students Tested.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
Pat Roschewski, Ph.D. Director of Statewide Assessment
Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
STATE STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS. 1969The National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) administered for the first time, Florida participated in the.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
1May 6, 2010 Florida Department of Education.  Science Updates  FCAT and FCAT 2.0  End-of-Course Science Assessments (EOC)  Interpretive Products.
TEKS Revisions and the End of Course Exams Tom Wurst March 25, 2010.
Graduation and Next Generation Assessment Update Coventry High School January 29, 2015.
A New Era in Social Sciences- SSS: Standards, Skills, and Stimuli Social Sciences Best Practices: Heading to the Finish Line.
Dallas ISD’s Value-Added Model School Effectiveness Index (SEI) Classroom Effectiveness Index (CEI) Data Analysis, Reporting, and Research Services.
The Gold Standard The Nation’s Report Card NAEP 2013.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 6/21/10.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Division of Social Sciences and Life Skills Elementary Social Studies Informational Meeting May 25, 2011 William Turner Technical S.H.S. WELCOME.
[Presentation by] [Date] [INSERT DISTRICT LOGO]. Table of Contents Big Picture: How Does It All Connect? Keystone Exams: The 33% Option Keystone Exams:
Student Assessment Literacy Project “SAL-P”. Why should you be assessment literate? It is your right to be informed and to know  on what you will be.
MTLE Passing Score-Setting Board of Teaching October 15, 2010.
Information provided by LISD Assessment Office.  STAAR stands for: › State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness  Implemented in for school year.
Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,
Math & Science Leaders Brian Bickley May 11, 2015.
The Nation’s Report Card 2009 Reading and Mathematics – Grade 12 National and State Results.
Gearing up for PARCC. Today! What did we learn from the field tests and how did it inform the development of PARCC assessments? What are the next steps.
Lyla Springfield 5/2007 FCAT Reading Update CLAS Presentation May 2007.
Frameworks Overall Facts and Presentations Hubbard High School Model Lakeview Career Readiness Certificates Grand Rapids Model.
Delaware Student Testing Program (DSTP) Informational Meeting and Public Forum Organized by Advocates for Children’s Education (ACE) February 12, 2003.
New Graduation Requirements November 10, Outline 1.Update on Graduation Requirements Work 2.Job Skills Assessment Recommendations 3. Substitute.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
1 Assessment Overview Ohio Department of Education Center for Curriculum & Assessment.
High School Exit Exam HSEE. At the beginning of the first semester or quarter of the regular school term (starting with the school year, and each.
1 Sarah McManus and Hope Tesh-Blum North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section North Carolina High.
FCAT 2.0 and End-of-Course Assessments 1 Kris Ellington Deputy Commissioner Division of Accountability, Research and Measurement 850/
Florida Science Standards Assessment Presentation to Florida Association of Science Supervisors, May 2008.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements and Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 3/15/2011.
June  – Last Year  ELA (UPK-9 th Grade)  Mathematics (5 th – Algebra)  – This Year  ELA (10 th Grade)  Mathematics (UPK-4.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams: A Change to Graduation Requirements.
Postsecondary Education Readiness Test (PERT) PERT
Criminal Intent – Innate or Learned? Why We Do What We Do Ian Walton and Michelle Pilati.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
TAKS What Students And Parents Can Do To Prepare Brought to you by the teachers and administrators of BHS who want your child to succeed in life.
A New Era in Social Sciences- SSS: Standards, Skills, and Stimuli Social Sciences Best Practices: Heading to the Finish Line.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Florida Department of Education - October 2007 FCAT Science Update Presentation to Florida Association of Science Supervisors October 2007.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
A presentation of methods and selected results 1.
FCAT Writing+ CLAS Spring FCAT Writing+ Content Advisory Committee Provides insight and guidance to the Florida Department of Education on the scope.
Achieving Classroom Excellence Act of 2005 Norman Public Schools Dr. Joseph Siano, Superintendent.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee January 11, 2016.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Minnesota Academic Standards and Graduation Requirements Assessment and Accountability Task Force Dr. Beth Aune July 31, 2012 “Leading for educational.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March Keric Ashley,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
TAKS Release Plan  In 2007 SB 1031 changed the release of tests to every three years  In 2009 HB 3 changed the release of tests to exclude retests 2.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
A STAAR Is Born Starring Criss Cloudt As Associate Commissioner, Assessment and Accountability, And Gloria Zyskowski As Division Director, Student Assessment,
Reduced STAAR test blueprints
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Weslaco East High School
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program Application Process
Presentation transcript:

FCAT Science High School Test – Grade 11 How did this happen? Why didn’t I know?

History of Grade Choices Original 1999 Legislation  Grades 4, 8, and 10 DOE Recommendation  Grades 5, 8, and 10  Rationale: Reading and Writing at Grade 4 Mathematics and Science at Grade 5

Grade 10 Concerns Content Advisory Committee  Concerns from the beginning  What Science of the SSS can be taught and tested by March of Grade 10? Item Review Committees  Can we include these items if all students have not had instruction? Rangefinding Committees  Can we require this “top score point” if all students can’t be expected to know this ?

1 – Test Administration History 2002 Field Test Item writing challenges Test construction challenges Hard to find top score responses to performance tasks

2 – Test Administration History 2003 – First Scores Reported Interpretation: Comparing to the State scores Low percent answering questions correctly Lots of blank performance tasks Questions –  Lack of learning?  Lack of consequences? (Student/School)

3 – Test Administration History 2004 – Second Scores Reported Performances somewhat improved Preparing for Standard Setting – Fall 2004  Pre-standard setting meeting January 2004  What performance represents on-grade level performance? Above grade level? Below grade level? Grade 10 Group – Struggled with “on grade level”  What content is on-grade level for all 10 th graders?

FCAT Science Performance GradeYearAvg. % Correct % % % % % %

4 – Field Test at Grade 11 Question – Could the items developed for grade 10 be used at grade 11 without additional field testing. March 2004 test was used (same as 10 th ) Statistical sample of 3,000 identified Ten schools from 8 districts were included Findings (late July) – An acceptable Grade 11 test can be built using existing statistical data from the items developed and field tested for Grade 10.

DOE Policy Considerations Keep test at Grade 10 – Expect less science Move to Grade 11 – Expect more science  Instructionally valid  Statistically appropriate  Legally challengeable (law says grade 10) Test both grades  10 th to conform to the law  11 th to collect data for standard setting  Cost for adding grade 11 - $1.2 million

Move to Grade 11 Pros Test will have more instructional validity Better scores are more likely Content advisory and administrative support Recommended by science teachers and curriculum specialists Cons Hard to motivate juniors Too much testing of juniors already No student consequences Logistical challenges of test administration with reading/math retakes

Thinking About Consequences Inclusion in A+ school accountability ( ) Should there be student consequences? 1. Pass for graduation 2. Diploma endorsement (high scores) 3. Require Level 1 (2?) students to pass another science course prior to graduation

 Plans under way to change law and rule Changes student consequences also?  Administer in Grade 11 in 2005  Set standards for Grade 11 in Fall 2005  Report scores in 2005 and 2006  Include in A+ School Accountability in So, where are we?

Questions? Dr. Cornelia S. Orr, Director Assessment and School Performance 850/