SPREEX 6FP CA SPREEX project conclusions on preventive and emergency interventions in response to oil spills oil spills Presentation at EU-MOP Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
Advertisements

Conclusions & perspectives -> Anne MOLCARD, MIO/USTV.
CIRAS PROJECT OVERVIEW
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Irish Coast Guard Local Authority oil spill Contingency Plans.
Supported by the European Union Project co-financed by the ERDF. Safer Seas, Brest, October 2007 The EROCIPS Project By Mel Parker EROCIPS Project Manager.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
1 6th FP Coordination Action SPREEX Spill Response Experience Project Conclusions 1 EU-MOP Workshop ETSIN Madrid January 25, 2008 SPREEX Technical Coordinator:
European COastal-shelf sea OPerational monitoring and forecasting system ECOOP.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
SEA-IT Dynamic contingency information system for maritime transportation Presented by Øyvind Endresen & Gjermund Gravir.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts on Coastal Communities M.V.K. Sivakumar.
BE-AWARE Project BONN AGREEMENT
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g WORK PACKAGE 2- FINAL RESULTS WP2 Seminar / Baltic Master II Partner Search The 19th of Dec., 2007 Prepared by Jakub.
Dr Costas Papaconstantinou
1. 2  Strategic – BC Hydro Long Term Planning  Project level  Environmental Assessment ▪ Federal - Canadian  Integration 3.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
Navigation solutions powered by Europe 1 WORKSHOP: European GNSS Applications in H2020 Introduction Christoph Kautz Prague, 4 February 2014 Navigation.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g Workshop on future co-operation Kalmar, 12 June 2007 Prepared by Jakub Piotrowicz.
Engaging with stakeholders: Adding value to the energy system 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Porto Pedro.
© 2005 EU-MOP Consortium Athens, 9 June 06 EU-MOP OVERVIEW Elimination Units for Marine Oil Pollution (EU-MOP): The Concept Harilaos N. Psaraftis Professor,
ERA-Net CIRCLE Climate Impact Research Coordination for a Larger Europe CIRCLE Objectives, Recent Results and Working Plan Sugárka Kelecsenyi (MEW) and.
This Programme is funded by the European Union And implemented by a conrtium led by MWH in partnership with DEMA, CIMA Research Foundation, Austrian Red.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
MARINERA Marine ERAnet European Research Area Identify research infrastructures Promote exchange between research teams in and outside Europe Organise.
Contributions to Exchange of Experience Initiatives by IMO, EMSA and Regional Organisations Michel Girin Director of Cedre. SaferSeas / Management of Accidental.
NWS Partners Meeting 2010 Dave Westerholm, Director National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Response and Restoration June 9, 2010.
SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture 28. februar – 1. mars Development and use of ” State-of-the-Art” project databases Why How Examples Conclusions.
Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014 FP7-Infra : Design studies for European Research Infrastrutures 1st October 2011.
Cultural Heritage Research in the context of Environmental Technologies in FP7 Andrea Tilche Head of Unit “Environmental Technologies” DG RTD
OPRC-HNS Technical Group International Maritime Organization.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g Lead Partner.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Piemonte Workshop 1 11 September 2006 Paolo Salieri European Commission DG ENTR-H4 Security research in FP7.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
Maritime Navigation and Information Services MarNIS FP6 - Integrated Project C. Willems, C. Glansdorp.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Authorities point of view How TOSCA can be a relevant tool for antipollution control? -> Commissaire Général (Ret) Alain VERDEAUX, PREMAR MED Authorities.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Baltic Master WP2 Seminar Safe Transportation at Sea Kalmar, June,2006.
Regional Programme of Statistics in the Mediterranean Region MEDSTAT Phase II This project is funded by the European Union 1 Workshop on Data Compilation.
Preliminary results of ESEOO project ESEOO Group.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g. Baltic Master II  Lead partner: Region Blekinge - Sweden  Political initiative  Builds on Baltic Master I (voted.
MarNIS Maritime Navigation and Information Services FP6 - Integrated Project.
Accessible and Inclusive ICT European Commission, DG Information Society and Media ICT for Inclusion Unit (H3) Challenge 7 ICT Call 2 Information day Brussels,
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
Seminar on early warning systems October 2008 Aix-en-Provence Summary of outcomes.
Dr. Stelios Panagiotou, Dr. Stelios C.A. Thomopoulos Integrated Systems Laboratory Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications National Center for.
OPRC Level 3 Spill Response Strategies Limitations and Issues.
CARPE DIEM 2 nd meeting Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches for Environmental.
Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries Oil Spill Contingency in a Future Perspective Interspill 2004 Norwegian Minister of Fisheries Svein Ludvigsen.
OPRC Level 3 The Contingency Planning Process. OPRC Level 3.
Coordination Performance Survey Validation workshop May 2016.
NERIS European Platform on Emergency and Recovery Preparedness and Response Abu Dhabi, 20 October,
Emergencies that endanger Tallinn as city of sea
Near-real-time monitoring activities: today and tomorrow
FP7 – ICT Theme a motor for growth, competiveness and social inclusion
Prof. Maria Loizidou Nicosia, Hilton Park Hotel, 15th June, 2006
OptiFrame WP1: Project Management
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Presentation to Islands Trust Council December 6, 2017 – Victoria, BC
Discussions support slides
Discussions support slides
Emergencies that endanger Tallinn as city of sea
Projects under Pillar I of White Paper on Climate Change Adaptation
Presentation transcript:

SPREEX 6FP CA SPREEX project conclusions on preventive and emergency interventions in response to oil spills oil spills Presentation at EU-MOP Workshop ETSIN Madrid 24/01/08 ETSIN Madrid 24/01/08 Juan B. Pérez Prat SPREEX Technical Coordinator

Fishing vessels response to the PRESTIGE spill

Fisherman spill response

SPREEX 6FP CA and the SST 2008 Call Spill response themes have not been included again on the Surface Transport Calls of the 6 th and the 7 th FP since the Post-Prestige Call SPREEX mid-term and final conclusions have succeed with the inclusion of the OSR subject again on the SST 2008 Call for Proposals SPREEX mid-term and final conclusions have succeed with the inclusion of the OSR subject again on the SST 2008 Call for Proposals Preventive and emergency interventions to protect marine coastal and land environment

Steps and tasks of the SPREEX project  Step 1 Selection of issues, with major importance on the spill response effectiveness  Step 2 Compile State of the Art (SoA) reports on the selected issues, including the on-going research  Step 3 Identification of GAPS impairing OSR effectiveness,needing further R&D effort or synergies. Identification of possible improvements and solutions to fill the GAPS.  Step 4 Presentation of results to open debate with Coast Guards end users and administrations on two open workshops.  Step 5 Final conclusions and dissemination

The four SPREEX pillars (WP)  WP 1 Lead by SASEMAR-: The organisation of the OSR, organisative schemes and information tools and flow, training, legal aspects and identification of responsibilities, and the places of refuge option  WP 2 Lead by Cedre: OSR operations action means, ships, equipment and their combinations as systems, including pre- outfitting of occasional OSR vessels, the use of robotics, and use of dispersants and aerial support.  WP 3 Lead by SINTEF: ICT detection, tracking and communication technologies, meteorological and oceanographic data acquisition and transmission, real time tracking and modelling spill trajectories, decision support systems and operations control.  WP 4 Lead by HDI Socio-economic aspects, the methodologies for the assessment of socio-economic impact, operational risk assessment tools and decision support, biodegradation and remedial actions, clean-up methodologies..

Partner participation overview LeaderIssues/reports Contributi ons Active partn ers WP 1 OSR Organisation and management SASEMAR5159 WP2 Technical resources CEDRE4138 WP 3 OS Real time Information SINTEF52211 WP 4 Socio-economic aspects DHI5148

Conclusions 1 A continuous dialogue between researchers and end users, as has been accomplished by SPREEX, is deemed necessary for identifying and filling existing Gaps for optimum response preparedness Spill response research cannot be justified by market pull and can only be effective in filling existing Gaps through the joint development of national and EU programmes such as 7FP. 2 Spill response research cannot be justified by market pull and can only be effective in filling existing Gaps through the joint development of national and EU programmes such as 7FP.

Conclusions II  Spill response research needs to be based on past experience from previous accidents but must not be limited solely to the most recent scenarios and to the reaction to previous accidents: it must be proactive by anticipating the risks of new possible postulated accidents with short-, medium- and long-term perspectives.

Conclusions III  Research must address not only new technologies, but also the integration of existing technologies not fully incorporated yet into spill response on efficient systems addressing different applications and needs.

Conclusions IV  A spill response research framework must be outlined at a European level to avoid major Gaps and to enable access to international databases, while at the same time avoiding duplication of efforts and facilitating the coordination of human resources and response means when needed.

Conclusions: R&D GAPS  Round Table 1 (Pillar WP 3) : Real time detection and tracking. Integration and real time updating of spill and ship information.  Round Table T 2 (Pillar WP 4a): Response management and decision support systems  Round Table T3 (Pillar WP 2): Recovery vessels and equipment, and use of dispersants  Round Table T4 (WP4b): Environmental and socio-economic effects

GAPS to fill by R&D  Spill detection sensors with resolution and capabilities on harsh sea conditions, on submerged oil spill detection and also on thickness and spill weathering information.  Systems integrating data from different sensors and platforms which include new aerial carriers such as AUV

GAPS to fill by R&D  Models combining meteorological and hydrodynamic data, met-ocean forecast for oil drift and coastal approach.  Compare oil spill models used by national authorities in Europe, to develop a common oil spill model which can be used for all EU waters with standard inputs (MetOcean, maps, oil data etc.).  Validation in exercises and in real spills.

GAPS to fill by R&D  Real time information systems, available to oil spill responders and concerned authorities,  Use of artificial intelligence algorithms on data processing and distribution.

GAPS to fill by R&D  Decision Support Systems (DSS) based on information from real time, providing the framework for contingency planning, local response, and coordinated response on major accidents.  Models and DSS tools shall be used for training, on preparedness exercises and refined and validated on real spills

GAPS to fill by R&D  Limitations of ships equipment, booms and containment techniques in rough seas, or in strong currents impair response efficiency.  Equipment testing procedures and performance assessment of the recovery systems in operation conditions, extended to rough sea conditions and to different products and viscosity.  Design accounting for spill changes by weathering and oil mixing with water requires improved skimmers and effective water separation by decanting and on-board heating capacity for product handling.

GAPS to fill by R&D  Effects of dispersed oil and assessment and quantification of socio-economic impacts on fisheries, tourism and other human activities.  Commonly accepted methodologies and tools, for preparedness, for decision making for assessment and shore logistics and criteria for clean-up completion.  Shore logistics and preparedness for disposal of mixed wastes after spill accidents (from sea recovery and coast cleaning)

Questions following the SPREEX conclusions Questions following the SPREEX conclusions SPREEX contact