Version 3.0 North American Numbering Council (NANC) Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows NOTE: For a more detailed description of each process step.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NANC Future of Numbering (FoN) Working Group July 19, 2005 Co-Chairs Hoke Knox, Sprint Karen Mulberry, MCI.
Advertisements

1 Number Portability Administration Center Change Orders NANC 399 & NANC 400 NANC Meeting March 15, 2005 Tom McGarry NeuStar, Inc.
NANC Change Order 400 Joint FoN/LNPA WG Meeting April 14, 2005 Tom McGarry NeuStar, Inc.
Telephone Numbers, Local Number Portability, and TCPA Compliance
Feature Interaction Handling in LESS Xiaotao Wu and Henning Schulzrinne Internet Real Time Laboratory.
North American Portability Management LLC 1 NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION.
ATC Conference Call January 10, 2008 Thank you for joining the call. We will start the call shortly. Please enter * 6 to mute your line and # 6 to unmute.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Shaunna Forshee, INC Co-Chair September 17, 2014.
This information is current as of 11/17/2004 and is subject to change- Verizon Wireless 1 Local Number Portability.
VoIP alarm monitoring. Traditional alarm systems Motion sensor Smoke detector Camera Premise Controll Unit Fire station Security service Central station.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Shaunna Forshee, INC Co-Chair September 18, 2013.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Shaunna Forshee, INC Co-Chair December 10, 2013.
1 Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Natalie McNamer, INC Chair Dana Crandall, INC Vice Chair December 13, 2012.
Data Exchange Standards in support of transaction processes 08 November 2004 Bonn, Germany Peggy Quarles Perrin Quarles Associates, Inc.
Document #07-5H RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) (mod 7/25 & clean-up 8/20) Customer Supplier.
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
Export Control System (Exit Summary Declaration) Implementation 01/01/2011.
© 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. 1 Video Relay Service and Assignment.
Overview and Guidelines for... SOA/NPAC, Internal and Inter- carrier testing.
Version 4.0 NOTE: For a more detailed description of each process step within these flows, please refer to the accompanying Inter-Service Provider LNP.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Shaunna Forshee, INC Co-Chair June 20, 2013.
INC Report to the NANC 11/30/06 1 Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC November 30, 2006 Ken Havens, INC Chair Adam Newman, INC Vice Chair.
Panasonic Communications Co., Ltd. Communication Network Company
© Copyright 2007 Arbinet-thexchange, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Voice Peering Steve Heap Chief Technology Officer.
© Copyright 2007 Arbinet-thexchange, Inc. All Rights Reserved. VoIP Peering Pilot Using the Internet2 Backbone.
© 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. The world’s networking company SM VoIP, Portability, and the Evolution of Addressing LNPA & Future of Numbering Working.
Mobile Communication Common Channel Signaling System No. 7 (i.e., SS7 or C7) is a global standard for telecommunications defined by the International Telecommunication.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
6/5/011 NPAC SMS BUSINESS DAYS/HOURS & TIMERS. 6/5/012 CONCEPTS Porting and Concurrence Business days Business hours Timers Service Provider profile.
1 INC Report to the NANC January 22, 2003 Dana Smith - INC Moderator Ken Havens - INC Assistant Moderator.
1 6/19/98Copyright 1998 ITN with NPAC and 3rd Party Network Element Barry Bishop Director of Numbering Services Lockheed Martin ITN Number Pooling.
September 15, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council September 15, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
INC Report to the NANC 02/13/ Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC February 13, 2007 Ken Havens, INC Chair Adam Newman, INC Vice.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Shaunna Forshee, INC Co-Chair June 17, 2014.
Presentation to Public Utility Commission of Texas October 24, 2002 ATIS and the OBF Informational Presentation prepared for the Public Utility Commission.
1 Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Natalie McNamer, INC Chair Dana Crandall, INC Vice Chair February 21, 2013.
Mismatch Is end-user porting all telephone numbers? New Service Provider notifies Old Service Provider of change using Local Service Request (LSR) Old.
Mismatch NNSP sends porting LSR to ONSP to port number. End-user Contact End-user agrees to change to New Service Provider (NLSP) NLSP obtains end-user.
INC Report to the NANC - September 25, INC Report to the NANC September 25, 2003 Dana Smith - INC Moderator Ken Havens - INC Assistant Moderator.
North American Numbering Council (NANC) Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows Version /16/2009.
Atrezzo Provider Portal Outpatient Case Creation July 2015 INTEGRATED CARE MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 1.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Connie Hartman, INC Co-Chair December 1, 2015.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC Dyan Adams, INC Co-Chair Connie Hartman, INC Co-Chair September 28, 2015.
RXQ Customer-specific Information Request Process Flow Supplier submits a Customer-specific Information Request ( ) Distribution Company processes.
INC Report to the NANC Status Report - Number Pooling and 500/900 Number Portability.
Telephone Numbers, Local Number Portability, and TCPA Compliance
MOBILE NUMBER PORTABILITY. NUMBER PORTABILITY TYPES BENEFITS ECONOMIC ISSUES.
SPS Spotlight Series October 2014
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Customer authorizes Enrollment ( ) 3 Customer ESI ID confirmed ( ) Yes
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Default cover design. Current Routing Solutions supporting the Interconnection of Carrier IP –based Multimedia Services in North America IPNNI
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Non-Geographic Porting Process : SWEDEN
Non-Geographic Porting Process : UK
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Geographic Porting Process : SWEDEN
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Porting Process : Denmark
Adam Newman, INC Vice Chair
Customer authorizes Enrollment ( ) 3 Customer ESI ID confirmed ( ) Yes
Robin Smith, INC Vice Chair
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Ken Havens - INC Assistant Moderator
Presentation transcript:

Version 3.0 North American Numbering Council (NANC) Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows NOTE: For a more detailed description of each process step within these flows, please refer to the accompanying Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows Narratives (Version 3.0) NOTE: Pursuant to FCC Order , released on November 8, 2007, Local Number Portability (LNP) obligations are extended to interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers. The North American Numbering Council (NANC) identifies three classes of interconnected VoIP providers, defined as follows: Class 1: A standalone interconnected VoIP provider that obtains numbering resources directly from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) and the Pooling Administrator (PA) and connects directly to the PSTN (i.e., not through a PSTN LEC partner’s end office switch). Class 1 standalone interconnected VoIP providers must follow the Main Flows for the LNP provisioning process, serving as the New Network Service Provider (NNSP) or Old Network Service Provider (ONSP), whichever is applicable. Class 2: An interconnected VoIP provider that partners with a facilities-based Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) Local Exchange Carrier (LEC) to obtain numbering resources and connectivity to the PSTN via the LEC partner’s end office switch. Although a Class 2 interconnected VoIP provider is not considered a reseller in the context of the FCC definition of a Simple Port (refer to FCC Order for Simple Port definition), Class 2 interconnected VoIP providers must follow the Reseller Flows for the LNP provisioning process, serving as the New Local Service Provider (NLSP) or Old Local Service Provider (OLSP), whichever is applicable. Class 3: A non-facilities-based reseller of interconnected VoIP services that utilizes the numbering resources and facilities of another interconnected VoIP provider (analogous to the “traditional” PSTN reseller). Although a Class 3 interconnected VoIP provider is not considered a reseller in the context of the FCC definition of a Simple Port (refer to FCC Order for Simple Port definition), Class 3 interconnected VoIP providers must follow the Reseller Flows for the LNP provisioning process, serving as the New Local Service Provider (NLSP) or Old Local Service Provider (OLSP), whichever is applicable.

Main End User agrees to change to NLSP NLSP obtains end user authorization (Optional)NLSP requests CSR from OLSP Did ONSP place the order in conflict? NPAC logs request to place the order in conflict, including cause code B NNSP coordinates physical changes with ONSP A AA No Yes NNSP and ONSP create and process service orders 12 No Yes End ZBB 20 Is the unconditional10 digit trigger being used? 19 Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows -Main Flow- End User Contact with NLSP 1 Are both NNSP and ONSP wireless? Service Provider Communication Service Provider Communication No Yes LSR-FOC ICP Are NNSP and ONSP the same SP? No Is NPAC processing required? Perform intra- provider port or modify existing SV No Yes NNSP coordinates all porting activities Figure2 1 3 NPAC notifies NNSP and ONSP that port is canceled Figure5 17 Service Provider Port Request Create Figure4 Was port request canceled? Yes No Notify Reseller Version 3.0

LSR/FOC

ICP Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows -Wireless ICP Process- No Yes ICP Is NLSP a Reseller? 1 NNSP sends WPR to ONSP 3 NLSP sends WPR or WPR information to the NNSP for resale service 2 Is OLSP a reseller? 8 ONSP sends WPR or WPR information to OLSP 9 OLSP sends WPRR or WPRR information to ONSP 10 ONSP Sends WPRR to NNSP 11 Is WPRR a delay? 14 Is WPRR confirmed? 16 WPRR is a resolution response 17 No Yes Return to Figure1 Figure3 Is OLSP as reseller? Is NLSP a reseller? 12 NNSP forwards WPRR or WPRR information to NLSP 13 No Yes No Yes Yes Is a Type1 wireless number involved? 4 No ONSP sends WPRR rejection to NNSP 5 Re-start process,return to Figure1 7 Change code owner to Old Wireline SP in NPAC and possibly LERG,as neccessary 6 Version 3.0

Create NNSP and (optionally)ONSP notify NPAC with Create message 1 T1Expired? T2 ? Received Second Create? Received Second Create? Yes No Is Create message valid? No Yes NPAC notifies NNSP and ONSP that T1has expired and then starts T2timer Is Create message valid? No Yes Is Create message valid? NPAC notifies appropriate service provider that Create message is invalid No Yes No Yes NPAC notifies appropriate service provider that Create message is invalid No Yes NPAC notifies appropriate service provider that Create message is invalid No Create Did NNSP send Create? Yes Return to FIgure1 NPAC notifies NNSP and ONSP that port is canceled Has cancel window for pending SVs expired? Yes No Return to Figure1 No NPAC starts T1 timer Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows -Subscription Version Create Flow- Figure NPAC notifies the ONSP that porting proceeds under the control of the NNSP 20 NPAC notifies NNSP and ONSP that T2has expired Version 3.0 Notify Reseller Figure 5

Notify Reseller

A

AA

B Was conflict resolved within conflict expiration window? B 5 No YesNo Yes Is conflict restricted? 1 Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows -Conflict Flow For The Service Creation Provisioning Process- NPAC rejects the conflict request 2 BB NNSP contacts ONSP to resolve conflict.If no agreement is reached,begin normal escalation 4 Was port request canceled to resolve conflict? 7 Yes Z No C Did NNSP send resolution message during the restriction window? Yes No BB 10 Figure8 NPAC rejects the conflict resolution request from NNSP 11 NPAC changes the subscription status to conflict and notifies the NNSP and ONSP Notify Reseller Figure5 NPAC initiates cancellation and notifies NNSP and ONSP Figure5 NPAC notifies both NNSP and ONSP of 'conflict off'via SOA Notify Reseller Figure5 6 3 Was resolution message from ONSP? No Yes 8 Notify Reseller 9 Was the Conflict Cause Code 50or51? No Yes 12 Version 3.0

Cancel/C

Cancel/Conflict/ CC

Disconnect

Audit NPAC issues queries to appropriate LSMSs Yes 2 No Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows -Audit Process- Service provider requests an audit from NPAC NPAC compares own subscription version to LSMS subscription version NPAC downloads updates to LSMSs with subscription version differences Are all audits completed? End 7 Figure12 NPAC reports audit completion and discrepancies to requestor Notify Reseller Figure5 6 Version 3.0

NPA-NXX

Cancel-Undo Figure15 Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows -Cancel-Undo Process- Is the subscription in cancel-pending status? Provider requests a cancel-undo Did the provider requesting a cancel-undo issue a cancel for this subscription? NPAC updates subscription to status prior to cancel and notifies NNSP and ONSP Figure5 5 Notify Reseller End NPAC rejects the cancel-undo request No 1 Yes Version 3.0