GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Near-Surface Geophysical Investigation of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake Epicentral Area Eray Kocel, Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, and Li Chang Eray Kocel,
Advertisements

Dr. Benedikt Halldorsson
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
Earthquakes in New Zealand. Global Distribution of Earthquakes.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Magnitude 8.9 (9.0) earthquake near Sendai, east coast of Honshu, Japan Friday, March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC Japan was struck by a magnitude 8.9 (9.0)
Christine Smyth and Jim Mori Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University.
A magnitude 7.3 earthquake occurred to the east of Kathmandu, in an area close to Mount Everest. This large earthquake is the largest aftershock so far.
Seismic/Eruption Teaching Modules Lawrence W. Braile Sheryl J. Braile Teaching About Earthquakes.
Bay Area Faults and Earth Material. Bay Area Faults.
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
Chapter 4: The SFBR Earthquake Source Model: Magnitude and Long-Term Rates Ahyi Kim 2/23/07 EQW.
Chapter 5: Calculating Earthquake Probabilities for the SFBR Mei Xue EQW March 16.
1 2 Outlines Earthquakes in the Manhattan area “Big” ones Small ones Earthquakes and earthquake hazard Causes of earthquakes Why Manhattan had earthquakes.
An earthquake is the vibration, sometimes violent, of the Earth's surface that follows a sudden release of stored energy when a fault ruptures. This energy.
Time-dependent seismic hazard maps for the New Madrid seismic zone and Charleston, South Carolina areas James Hebden Seth Stein Department of Earth and.
April Exploring a collaboration between Caltech and the Singaporean government Forecasting giant earthquakes of the Sumatran subduction zone and.
2007 NSTA: St. Louis, Missouri Earthquake Prediction and Forecasting: A Case Study of the San Andreas and New Madrid Faults Sponsored by: IRIS (Incorporated.
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
The 09/03/2010 Darfield Earthquake and its Aftershocks, Including the 02/21/2011 Christchurch Event Educational Slides Created & Compiled by Gavin Hayes.
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
September 20101Master of Science in Geological & Mining & Sciences Michigan Technological University – College of Engineering Historic Activity Records.
Seismic Reflection Image along I-64 Pratt et al., 1988 Coruh et al., 1988.
Earthquake Science Project By: Olivia Holmes and Emma Cyr.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Comparison of February 2010 Chile, January 2010 Haiti, and December 2004 Sumatra Earthquakes. EarthquakeMagnitude*Focal DepthTsunamiDeaths Chile8.835 km“minor”~900.
Real-time application of Coulomb stress modelling and related issues By Suleyman S. Nalbant, Sandy Steacy & John McCloskey Geophysics Research Group, University.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
UNIT SIX: Earth’s Structure  Chapter 18 Earth’s History and Rocks  Chapter 19 Changing Earth  Chapter 20 Earthquakes and Volcanoes.
Chapter 4 Earthquakes Map is from the United States Geological Survey and shows earthquake hazard for the fifty United States.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
Earthquake Science (Seismology). Seismometers and seismic networks Seismometers and seismic networks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Toward urgent forecasting of aftershock hazard: Simultaneous estimation of b-value of the Gutenberg-Richter ’ s law of the magnitude frequency and changing.
A functional form for the spatial distribution of aftershocks Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
Earthquake forecasting using earthquake catalogs.
Southern California Earthquake Center Triggering Models vs. Smoothed Seismicity PG = 1.35/eqk PG = 10/eqk Information gain per earthquake Reference forecast.
VALUING THE RISK OF IMPERFECT INFORMATION; CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKE Callum Logan, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Attempting to Reconcile Holocene And Long-Term Seismicity Rates in the New Madrid Seismic Zone Mark Zoback – Stanford University NASA World Wind looking.
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence Jim Dieterich, UC Riverside.
Foreshocks, Aftershocks, and Characteristic Earthquakes or Reconciling the Agnew & Jones Model with the Reasenberg and Jones Model Andrew J. Michael.
Natural and Cultural Characteristics of an Environment that make it vulnerable to E.N.E.
A 7.2 magnitude earthquake occurred about 250 km ENE of Kurli’sk, Russia. The earthquake occurred at a depth of km (76 miles). There are currently.
A magnitude 7.6 earthquake struck near the Solomon Islands on Sunday morning local time; there were no immediate reports of damage. The earthquake was.
A GPS-based view of New Madrid earthquake hazard Seth Stein, Northwestern University Uncertainties permit wide range (3X) of hazard models, some higher.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Friday 2/25/11 Discovery’s Last Ride Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND Monday, February 21, 2011 at 23:51:43 UTC A magnitude 6.3 earthquake.
EARTHQUAKE REPORT SOUTH AMERICA WEEK OF FEBRUARY 3 RD TO FEBRUARY 9 TH, 2016 OLIVIA HELPRIN.
South East Strategic Regional Coastal Monitoring Programme – Annual Review Meeting, November 2009 Satellite Data for Coastal Monitoring Trevor Burton Fugro-BKS.
1 Ching-Hui Wu Department of Nuclear Regulation Atomic Energy Council, Taiwan September 23, 2013 An Overview of the Recommendations from NEA peer review.
Understanding Earth Sixth Edition Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES © 2011 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan.
GNS Science Operational Earthquake Forecasting in New Zealand: Advances and Challenges Annemarie Christophersen, David A. Rhoades, David Harte & Matt C.
GNS Science Testing by hybridization – a practical approach to testing earthquake forecasting models David Rhoades, Annemarie Christophersen & Matt Gerstenberger.
UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards
Jiancang Zhuang Inst. Statist. Math. Detecting spatial variations of earthquake clustering parameters via maximum weighted likelihood.
North Texas Earthquake Study Group EARTHQUAKES AND FLUID DISPOSAL – A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Acknowledgements: Cliff Frohlich and the USGS Earthquake Hazards.
Earthquakes Liz LaRosa 2009http:// for my 5 th grade science class 2009.
Key terms Risk The exposure of people to a
SAN ANDREAS FAULT San Francisco Bay Area North American plate
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS, PATTERNS, AND RISK
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Seismic Eruption - forecasting future earthquakes
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
Plate Tectonics Tectonic plates are blocks of lithosphere that consist of the crust and the rigid, outermost part of the mantle and glide across the.
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Presentation transcript:

GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform Dr. Matt Gerstenberger – GNS Science Dr Philip Barnes – NIWA Prof Jarg Pettinga – University of Canterbury

GNS Science

Aftershock Decay Rate Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Long-term (50yr) Earthquake Rate Forecast Used to inform update of building codes Accounts for different earthquake clustering scales Combines four different models Used to estimate probabilities of ground shaking Short-term clustering model Days to Year(s) Medium-term clustering model Years to decades Long-term average model Average earthquake rate since 1960 NSHM fault model Longest-term mostly time- independent Increasing time scale Yearly number of earthquakes greater than magnitude 5 from three models Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Magnitude Magnitude Start date & Length 1 week30 days1 year1 week30 days1 year May 19 th in 81 in 39 in 101 in 1001 in 201 in 4 May 19 th in 301 in 107 in 10<1 in 1001 in 1001 in 10 Extended probabilities of aftershocks and larger events for Canterbury following the 2010 Darfield earthquake from short-term model All earthquakes up to May 16 th 2011 were used for these calculations. These forecasts are anticipated to change as the sequence continues to develop. The occurrence of a larger aftershock will temporarily increase the probabilities Extended “quiet times” may cause a decrease in the probabilities Each day a larger event does not occur, the probabilities decrease Probability of a M6.0 is approximately 10 times that of a 6.9

GNS ScienceNatural Hazards Research Platform So, if there are going to be further large aftershocks or triggered events, where might they occur……. – this is why we have turned to geophysical surveys to investigate where bedrock faults occur with any evidence of recent movement

GNS Science Canterbury has many active faults that contribute to the earthquake hazard Faulting..….. and the Earthquake-driven Landscape Key Questions: Natural Hazards Research Platform Pettinga et al. (1998)

GNS Science Greendale Fault Geology map source: GNS Science QMap series & University of Canterbury Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Onshore seismic reflection lines and aftershock map Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Depth (m) Lyttelton Volcano Paleo-topography 8 km South North Port Hills fault Natural Hazards Research Platform Line 1 - New Brighton Beach

GNS Science Line 2 - Barbadoes Street Lyttelton railway lineBarbadoes Street Lyttelton Volcano Paleo-topography Depth (m) channel South North 3.7 km Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Investigating Canterbury subsurface structure Near surface variations in rock density Red lines are known surface active faults Dots are gravity measurement locations Natural Hazards Research Platform Magnetic signature of rocks

GNS Science Collection finished last week. Variations are dominantly due to volcanism (12-6 Ma Banks Peninsula) Buidings and other man-made features need to be identified Natural Hazards Research Platform Variations in magnetic signature of bedrock

GNS ScienceNatural Hazards Research Platform Variations in bedrock topography

GNS Science Multichannel Seismic Reflection data Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Is there active faulting south of the Pegasus Bay Fault? YES, but the faults must have very low vertical slip rates Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform

GNS Science 1. Faults imaged appear to have extremely low movement rates consistent with very long intervals between major earthquakes 2. There is no evidence of aftershocks stepping onto further offshore faults 3. Further results relating to the seismic profiling southwest and west of the city will become available in a month or so 4. Evidence for low rates of fault movement across the region derived from the subsurface geophysical studies is consistent with assessment that the September and February earthquakes are rare occurrences in Canterbury 5. Forecasts for earthquake activity in the future (1-50 years) has been incorporated into a revision of the building code for the rebuild programme in Canterbury 6. The research teams will be focusing on the integration of the various datasets to provide more confident assessment of earthquake likelihood In Summary Natural Hazards Research Platform